Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Proposing P-Duration: A New Scheduling Parameter — Seeking PMI Community Feedback Before Formal Publication

linkedin twitter facebook   Scheduling  
avatar
PAVANKUMAR POKURI Head - Planning, Project Controls| Jakson Green Limited Tenali, Andhra Pradesh, India

Proposing P-Duration: A New Scheduling Parameter — Seeking PMI Community Feedback Before Formal Publication

After 20+ years of GCC project controls practice — across $2B+ in EPC and infrastructure programs — I'd like to share a concept and invite feedback before pursuing formal publication.

THE PROBLEM

On a major water transmission project in Oman, I reviewed a recovery schedule claiming to compress several critical activities to durations that — on forensic analysis — were physically impossible, regardless of crew size or budget.

The activities involved mandatory regulatory hold periods, sequential testing protocols, and authority inspection requirements. No resources could change these.

We have Planned Duration (resource-constrained). We have Crash Duration (minimum via resource acceleration). But we have no formal term for the minimum duration that exists regardless of resources.

INTRODUCING P-DURATION

P-Duration: The minimum achievable duration for any project activity, constrained by physical, sequential, and regulatory factors — independent of resource availability. It is the absolute scheduling floor: the point at which adding further resources produces zero additional schedule compression.

Three constraint categories:

1. Physical — concrete cure, BESS battery conditioning, RO membrane stabilisation

2. Sequential dependencies — activities requiring specific predecessor physical states

3. Regulatory — mandatory inspection hold periods, authority certification windows

WHY IT MATTERS

P-Duration applies directly in three areas: reviewing recovery schedules for physical feasibility, validating baseline schedule floors, and EOT/forensic delay analysis. Over 20 years, I applied this logic to recover $22M+ in Claims and EOTs across the GCC. It now has a name.

Full article with worked examples and comparison tables:

[Paste your LinkedIn article URL here]

QUESTIONS FOR THE PMI SCHEDULING COMMUNITY

1. Is this concept already formally named in existing scheduling or PMI literature?

2. Have you encountered schedules in practice that violated what I'm calling P-Duration?

3. Does the proposed definition accurately capture the concept?

4. Which PMI standard or Practice Guide would be most appropriate to extend this into?

I am preparing a formal paper for AACE Transactions and PM World Journal. Genuine input from experienced practitioners at this stage is valuable.

— Pavankumar P, PMP® | GM – Planning & Project Controls, Jakson Green | 20+ Yrs GCC | $2B+ Portfolio

Sort By:
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Pavan,

Thank you for sharing this thought-provoking concept. It addresses a challenge that many project controls professionals have experienced when reviewing aggressive recovery schedules.

I particularly appreciate the distinction between durations that can be compressed through additional resources and durations constrained by physical, sequential, or regulatory realities.

One reflection that comes to mind is whether there may be a fourth category of constraint worth considering: coordination.

In practice, I have seen situations where activities were theoretically compressible from a resource perspective, yet productivity stopped improving beyond a certain point.
Additional crews, supervisors, equipment, or shifts did not accelerate progress because the limiting factor was no longer capacity. It was the system's ability to coordinate work effectively.

As resource density increases, teams often begin competing for space, access, information, interfaces, inspections, and supervision.
At that point, adding resources may increase cost without improving productivity and, in some cases, may even reduce quality, safety, or workflow reliability.

This raises an interesting question: should the minimum achievable duration be viewed not only through physical, sequential, and regulatory constraints, but also through the practical limits of operational coordination?

Regardless of the terminology ultimately adopted, I believe your proposal highlights an important reality that is often overlooked during schedule compression exercises:

Not all durations are resource-driven, and not all delays can be solved by adding more resources.

That distinction alone could significantly improve schedule realism, recovery planning, and forensic analysis.

A valuable contribution to the discussion and one I would be interested in seeing developed further.
avatar
PAVANKUMAR POKURI Head - Planning, Project Controls| Jakson Green Limited Tenali, Andhra Pradesh, India
Thank you for the thoughtful contribution.
Your observation about coordination constraints is particularly interesting. In practice, we often see a point where adding crews, equipment, or shifts no longer improves productivity because the limiting factor becomes interfaces, access, supervision, inspections, decision-making, or simply the system's ability to absorb additional resources.
My initial thinking was that coordination effects may be an emergent property of physical and sequential constraints, but your comment suggests they may warrant consideration as a distinct category within the framework.
I agree that this is an area worth exploring further. The broader objective of P-Duration is to challenge the assumption that every schedule problem can be solved through additional resources. As you rightly point out, understanding where compression stops being effective is critical for realistic planning, recovery scheduling, and forensic analysis.
I appreciate the insight and look forward to developing the concept further through discussions like this.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Never look at the trombones, it only encourages them."

- Richard Strauss

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors