Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Are We Measuring PMOs Against the Wrong Objective?

linkedin twitter facebook   Benefits Realization   Leadership   PMO  
avatar
Imran Afzal Author| The Strategic PMO Cary, NC, United States

One question has been on my mind lately.

Organizations spend a great deal of time evaluating PMOs based on execution outcomes.

Did projects finish on time?

Did governance mature?

Did reporting improve?

Did portfolio visibility increase?

Those are all worthwhile measures.

But I wonder if they're measuring the outcome rather than the contribution.

By the time a project slips, priorities change, or a major dependency emerges, many of the decisions that shaped those outcomes have already been made.

That makes me wonder whether the greatest value of a mature PMO isn't simply coordinating execution.

Perhaps it's improving the quality of the decisions that happen before execution begins.

Helping leaders surface tradeoffs.

Creating shared understanding.

Bringing the right information into the conversation at the right time.

Helping organizations make better prioritization decisions before resources are committed.

If that's true, perhaps one of the most meaningful questions we could ask isn't:

"Did the PMO improve project execution?"

But instead:

"Did the PMO improve the organization's ability to make better strategic decisions?"

I'm curious how others think about this.

For those leading PMOs, portfolios, or enterprise transformation efforts, what do you consider the most meaningful measure of a PMO's long-term impact?
Sort By:
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
This raises an important question.

I wonder whether the greatest contribution of a mature PMO is not improving individual decisions, but improving the organisational conditions from which consistently better decisions emerge.

When assumptions are made explicit, trade-offs are explored constructively, priorities are aligned and learning is carried across initiatives, better decisions become a natural consequence rather than an isolated achievement.

Perhaps the true measure of a PMO is not the quality of the decisions it influences, but the quality of the decision-making environment it helps create.
That capability continues to generate value long after any single project has finished.
...
1 reply by Imran Afzal
Jun 29, 2026 1:03 PM
Imran Afzal
...
Luis, I really like the distinction you're making between improving individual decisions and improving the environment from which better decisions consistently emerge. That shifts the focus from isolated outcomes to organizational capability, which is arguably much more enduring. I also think it reinforces the idea that mature PMOs create conditions for better judgment rather than simply better governance. Thanks for adding another dimension to the discussion.
avatar
Imran Afzal Author| The Strategic PMO Cary, NC, United States
Jun 29, 2026 11:14 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
This raises an important question.

I wonder whether the greatest contribution of a mature PMO is not improving individual decisions, but improving the organisational conditions from which consistently better decisions emerge.

When assumptions are made explicit, trade-offs are explored constructively, priorities are aligned and learning is carried across initiatives, better decisions become a natural consequence rather than an isolated achievement.

Perhaps the true measure of a PMO is not the quality of the decisions it influences, but the quality of the decision-making environment it helps create.
That capability continues to generate value long after any single project has finished.
Luis, I really like the distinction you're making between improving individual decisions and improving the environment from which better decisions consistently emerge. That shifts the focus from isolated outcomes to organizational capability, which is arguably much more enduring. I also think it reinforces the idea that mature PMOs create conditions for better judgment rather than simply better governance. Thanks for adding another dimension to the discussion.
avatar
Aaron Porter
Community Champion
IT Director| Blade HQ Payson, UT, United States
I think it depends on the type of PMO/what the business expects from it (or allows) and how the organization is structured. Enterprise PMO? The should certainly ask the questions. That doesn't mean the business will listen. Other types of PMO may not have enough of a voice, or there may be another department (strategy?) filling that role.

Either way, somebody should be asking the questions - preferably before something major goes wrong.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Love your enemies just in case your friends turn out to be a bunch of bastards."

- R.A. Dickson

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors







Newsletters

Jun 24: Acumen Is a Process, Not a Place
Jun 17: 7 Ways to Show Business Acumen Every Day
Jun 3: The Career Problem Facing New PMs

See all newsletters