Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

How does your organization currently define and measure Agility? Are these measures helping or hindering real improvement?

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile   Ethics   Leadership  
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, the term “Agility” is often misunderstood. Many organizations and leaders equate Agility with speed—believing that to be Agile is simply to move faster. But true Enterprise Agility is not about racing ahead; it’s about adapting intelligently, making better decisions, and continuously delivering value to customers. Speed, when achieved without direction or purpose, can be detrimental. This blog post explores why speed is merely a by-product of Agility, not its core, and how misinterpreting this relationship can undermine the very essence of Agile transformation.

  1. How does your organization currently define and measure Agility? Are these measures helping or hindering real improvement?
  2. In what ways might a focus on speed or velocity be undermining your team’s ability to deliver value?
  3. What steps could you take to shift the conversation from outputs and speed to outcomes and learning?

Blog post: Agility Doesn’t Mean Moving Faster: Why Speed Is a By-Product, Not the Primary Objective

ProjectManagement.com - The Agile Enterprise

Sort By:
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
One measure I find particularly useful is not how much faster teams are moving, but how long the organization takes to respond meaningfully when reality changes.

Where does time accumulate between a new signal, recognition that something matters, a decision, and the ability to act on it?
Those delays often reveal more about organizational agility than velocity or output metrics.

A focus on speed can even hide the problem.
Teams may deliver faster while waiting weeks for priorities, funding, dependencies or decisions to change.

For me, the conversation shifts from outputs to outcomes when we start asking not only what was delivered, but what changed, what was learned, and whether the organization became better able to adapt because of it.
...
1 reply by Stelian ROMAN
Sep 07, 2026 10:56 PM
Stelian ROMAN
...
"But how long does the organization take to respond meaningfully when reality changes." Interesting idea. It is aligned with a definition of the Agile Enterprise made in 1990s: Capacity to respond fast and efficiently to change. Unfortunately, most of the documents produced by the Agile Forum are lost.
avatar
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
Community Champion
Program Manager| HARPER SRL Santo Domingo / Distrito Nacional, Dominican Republic
For us, agility is more about how well we adapt to change and continue delivering value than how fast we complete work.
Metrics are useful, but only if they help the team improve. When the focus shifts to velocity or speed alone, it's easy to lose sight of the outcomes we're trying to achieve.
...
1 reply by Stelian ROMAN
Sep 07, 2026 10:57 PM
Stelian ROMAN
...
I found it very hard to define metrics for Agility. It's like measuring innovation or entrepreneurship.
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia
Jul 09, 2026 5:58 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
One measure I find particularly useful is not how much faster teams are moving, but how long the organization takes to respond meaningfully when reality changes.

Where does time accumulate between a new signal, recognition that something matters, a decision, and the ability to act on it?
Those delays often reveal more about organizational agility than velocity or output metrics.

A focus on speed can even hide the problem.
Teams may deliver faster while waiting weeks for priorities, funding, dependencies or decisions to change.

For me, the conversation shifts from outputs to outcomes when we start asking not only what was delivered, but what changed, what was learned, and whether the organization became better able to adapt because of it.
"But how long does the organization take to respond meaningfully when reality changes." Interesting idea. It is aligned with a definition of the Agile Enterprise made in 1990s: Capacity to respond fast and efficiently to change. Unfortunately, most of the documents produced by the Agile Forum are lost.
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia
Jul 09, 2026 10:46 PM
Replying to Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
...
For us, agility is more about how well we adapt to change and continue delivering value than how fast we complete work.
Metrics are useful, but only if they help the team improve. When the focus shifts to velocity or speed alone, it's easy to lose sight of the outcomes we're trying to achieve.
I found it very hard to define metrics for Agility. It's like measuring innovation or entrepreneurship.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

Some editors are failed writers, but so are most writers.

- T. S. Eliot

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors