Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

How to stay efficient within project risk management

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
Chul-Young Byun Berlin, Berlin, Germany

In project environments with tight budget and time restrictions the demand for efficient approaches is high. This can affect any project area including project risk management. As a response to such challenges a lean project risk management tool (“Top 8 Risk Factor Checklist Tool”) was developed. This tool is based on standard risk factors (“weak signals of risks”) proposed by recent research studies. A pre-test of the “Top 8 Risk Factor Checklist Tool” was conducted on real software development projects with project managers from different companies located in the US, the UK, Germany, Switzerland and India. Per design there were two groups: (1) the “test group” and (2) the “control group”. The “test group” members applied the tool on a weekly basis for several weeks. The “control group” members were only surveyed on the standard risk factors and mitigation activities. The following test observations were made: 1. The “test group” members needed effectively only about 3 minutes per week to assess the 8 standard risk factors and to provide feedback on mitigation activities. 2. The “test group” perceived more of the 8 risk factors than the “control group”. 3. The “test group” reported more risk factor mitigation activities than the “control group”. 4. Mitigation activities of the “test group” were more “risk factor perception oriented” than the mitigation activities of the “control group”. 5. The majority of the “test group” members would use the tool again on other projects. The test observations indicate that the lean project risk management tool seems to be (a) time efficient, (b) considering appropriate standard risk factors and most importantly (c) beneficial for project managers. Don’t miss the positive experience made by those participated project managers and learn about your individual risk management profile in comparison of the overall “test group” profile.



I am looking forward to hearing from you!


Sort By:
avatar
Suhail Iqbal Suhail Iqbal PMIATP CIPM FAAPM MPM MQM CLC CPRM SCT AEC SDC SMC SPOC PRINCE2 MCT| PM Training School Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan
Can you kindly share the 8 Risk Factors briefly, which you have mentioned?
avatar
Chul-Young Byun Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Thanks for the question!

Here is the list of the 8 risk factors:

• Misunderstanding the requirements (e.g. not having a clear overall vision, etc.)
• Lack of top management commitment to the project (e.g. lack of oversight by executives and visibility of their commitment, etc.)
• Lack of adequate user involvement (e.g. users do not actively participate in the project team, etc.)
• Failure to gain user commitment (e.g. laying blame for "lack of client responsibility" on the project leader rather than on the involved users, etc.)
• Failure to manage user expectations (expectations mismatched with the project deliverable, etc.)
• Changing requirements (e.g. increasing amount of requirements, which are changing quicker than the project can cope, etc.)
• Lack of effective project management methodology (e.g. inadequate project management methodology selected for the project, etc.)
• Lack of adequate project team (e.g. right skilled people with wrong attitude, etc.)
avatar
Pravin Kumar Shrivastava Associate Vice President| Aithent Technologies Pvt Ltd Gurgaon, Haryana, India
How can we get more information about this tool ? How to use it and institutionalize ?
avatar
Suhail Iqbal Suhail Iqbal PMIATP CIPM FAAPM MPM MQM CLC CPRM SCT AEC SDC SMC SPOC PRINCE2 MCT| PM Training School Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan
Thanks a lot for the risk factors. Very insightful.
avatar
Chul-Young Byun Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Re: "How can we get more information about this tool ? How to use it and institutionalize ? "

Thanks so much for the question!

Below is a link to the slide deck, which provides more information on the tool, its usage and actually how to apply for trying out the tool in course of the continued experiment. What I originally shared in this discussion thread are the positive interim results to motivate PMs to try out the tool.

Is this helpful?

Slide deck link: https://www.fom.de/fileadmin/fom/forschung..._Management.pdf

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS
ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors