Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

How can agile be implemented on Turn key projects?

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile  
avatar
Waqas Akram Chief Operating Officer| Camusat Islamabad, Pakistan
I am managing the turn key project and want to implement Agile methodology.
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Pravin Kumar Shrivastava Associate Vice President| Aithent Technologies Pvt Ltd Gurgaon, Haryana, India
Best way could to divide the larger projects in Sub Project and implement the agile in that.
avatar
Suhail Iqbal Suhail Iqbal PMIATP CIPM FAAPM MPM MQM CLC CPRM SCT AEC SDC SMC SPOC PRINCE2 MCT| PM Training School Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan
Waqas, you have raised a very interesting question here. Normally a turn-key project would be a fixed price contract where scope is pretty much fixed. Then how can a turnkey project be agile? Generally my answer would be NO, a turnkey project cannot be agile. But what if it is an IT project with changing requirements. In such a case, the contract itself must describe explicitly how change in scope will be managed. If you think a bit more creatively, you will be able to see how and what can be done to make aturnkey contract agile. You may be assigned to develop a system but where and how it would be deployed would be decided later. Even the soecs of the system itself are liable to change continuously. Though tricky but possible.
avatar
Francisco Abreu Portfolio Manager| Banco Central do Basil Brasilia, Df, Brazil
Wagas.
I have this problem in my IT projects.
The approach that we have used in this issue in my department was abolishing some agile concepts such as backlog list and time box, for example.
Personally, I DO NOT believe in the time box concept, because I don’t know clients that accept “half product” because the time has gone. The contracts that I know consider “escope” instead “time”. Except body shopping . . . but in this case they don’t turn key projects what conduct us back to start . . .
In my department we handled agile projects with outsource companies in this way:
1. Software Provided Outsource Company is contracted for unit value measured in FUNCTION POINT (FP) or STORY POINTS (SP).
2. Project Team accomplishes a detailed requisites analysis.
3. These requisites were divided in modules
4. These modules are quantified in FP or SP
5. This quantity is multiplied by unit value contracted. In this step one formal SERVICE'S ORDER is opened and sent to outsource company.
6. Each module is developed under the agile concepts such as ATDD, Kanban Controls, Burndown Graphics, Agile Teams, Banchs, etc . . .
In this way we are able to maintain the scope’s control what are sent, received, homologated, and deployed. . .
We know we don’t are being “pure” agile, but we believe that results are much more important . . . and we are getting them . . .
I hope I have contributed
avatar
Francisco Abreu Portfolio Manager| Banco Central do Basil Brasilia, Df, Brazil
Waqas.
In my previous post I spelled your name in incorrect form.
I"m so sorry about that.
avatar
Waqas Akram Chief Operating Officer| Camusat Islamabad, Pakistan
Pravin thanks but the issue is that when i sub divide the project i do not have a definitive outcome, i mean that phases are overlapped.
avatar
Waqas Akram Chief Operating Officer| Camusat Islamabad, Pakistan
Suhail Sb, exactly my point. When ever i want to implement in Roll Out which is turn key then due to over lapping phases i am not able to implement but in other industry as you mentioned in IT, agile can be implemented.
I have tried and in making it agile focus from project deliverable are out.
avatar
Waqas Akram Chief Operating Officer| Camusat Islamabad, Pakistan
Thank you Francisco for detailed reply.
I feel that implementation of agile is more in IT and like you said that results matter so we can not implement agile completely.
avatar
Waqas Akram Chief Operating Officer| Camusat Islamabad, Pakistan
No worries Francisco for the spells.
cheers.
avatar
Ashok Gupta Group Manager| Mercer Consulting India Pvt Ltd New Delhi, Delhi, India
I strongly believe that Agile approach can be applied to even fix-bid, fix-scope projects as well, it may not be true Scrum Agile but could still be iterative agile of some sort. Lets take an example here (and please add /share your inputs) -

Lets assume that I am given a turn-key project to run that has $1000 budget and it is about constructing a room within 20 weeks.

I can start creating a backlog with help from a business lead (=PO) as I interview stakeholders/business teams to gather requirements, rough estimate could help me plan how many iterations I can have and how i would like to time box them.

Examples (4 weeks ITR each) -
ITR1 - work with vendors, contract, procure material, lay out base
ITR2- construct 4 walls
ITR3- construct roof, fittings etc
ITR4 - paint it all, finishing etc
ITR5- handovers, closure tasks, turn the key over :)

Hope this helps. Do share your views :)

Thanks
Ashok Gupta
I blog at: http://agilescrumfordummies.blogspot.in/
avatar
Shenbagaraman Ramiah PM Consultant| L&T Infotech Thane, Maharashtra, India
Waqas, as mentioned by Suhail, Turnkey project is supposed have detailed plan. It is not practicable for agile in non-IT projects. Within the project, you can try to follow agile process, which will help to monitor the progress on daily basis.
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever."

- Chinese Proverb

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors