Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Does control account level need to be in the same level as work package level?

linkedin twitter facebook   Communications Management   Construction   Earned Value Management   Work Breakdown Structures (WBS)  
avatar
Ganesan Balaji PMP, RMP, PgMP Lead| --- Tx, United States
In a project, WBS is defined in sufficient detail to facilitate proper monitoring and control and achieve the objectives.

Execution level monitoring is done at lowest level of WBS ( say work package WP level).

Is it necessary to also to fix the control account at this level?
If so, will this not increase the work load for control account personnel?

If control account is positioned at a level higher than the execution progress monitoring level, then the WP has to be rolled upto control account level. In that case, progress monitoring will be done at lowest level and control account will be at higher WBS level.

In such situation, the key stakeholder will not be able to know the detail of where the problem/issue lies?

How to overcome this issue?
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 >
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Dec 31, 2015 3:00 PM
Replying to Steven Zachary
...
Hmm....I don't know if it's not ethical, but maybe just a lessons learned. Keep it in mind anyways.
Trust my words, I am very well aware of the company's Ethics Policy and Regulations.
< 1 2 3 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"A doctor can bury his mistakes but an architect can only advise his client to plant vines."

- Frank Lloyd Wright

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors