Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Form of agreement structure: general principles or detailed elements?

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
fosco frongia Senior project manager| ENTE PATRIMONIALE CHIESA GESU' CRISTO SUG Fino Mornasco, Como, Italy
Talking about agreements, I noticed that some cultural groups prefer very detailed contract and other ones prefer for of contracts that include only general principles. I think it is due to the culture of the groups which act, in the sense that to prefer a form or the other ones depends to the final target of them: relationship building (principles), contract signature (detailed contracts).
what do you think about my affirmation?
In your country is it generally preferred a detailed contract or a contract based on general principles? Which are the reasons that govern this preference?
many thanks for your contribution
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 >
avatar
fosco frongia Senior project manager| ENTE PATRIMONIALE CHIESA GESU' CRISTO SUG Fino Mornasco, Como, Italy
Mar 07, 2016 8:07 PM
Replying to Vincent Guerard
...
In my experience a detail contract is the most use, regardless of countries. Local laws make a big difference in the way a detail contract is structured and the wording is key. Never forgetting where the contract will be interpreted in case of misunderstanding.

A detail contract become voluminous opening the door to contradictions. Often those will need to have a technical resolution.

In addition in the construction industry I've seem reference to norms that are contradictory.

A detail Contrat often become too complex, and contradictions become clear just at the execution phase.
sorry Vincent,
previous comment was sent by myself but I don't know why in anonymously form
Fosco
< 1 2 3 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Few people think more than two or three times a year; I have made an international reputation for myself by thinking once or twice a week."

- George Bernard Shaw

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors