Scott McEntireProject Manager| MastercardSt. Peters, Mo, United States
Adaptive, and this is my opinion as to why...
You need a good baseline from where to start, but as you move forward, you should take test exams and identify your strengths and weaknesses. Based on that weaknesses, you should be willing to adjust your studying techniques to focus on the bigger challenges of your learning. You are the key stakeholder in this who can decide when you need to adjust your training, so let your own change requests drive you.
...
1 reply by Anupam
Jul 26, 2016 1:15 PM
Anupam
...
Thanks Scott
Saving Changes...
Thomas WalentaGlobal Project Economy ExpertHackenheim, Germany
Hi Scott, why do you think this is not iterative and incremental?
Are there changing requirements or targets?
...
1 reply by Scott McEntire
Jul 25, 2016 5:35 PM
Scott McEntire
...
Thomas... I believe this to be a case of both of those approaches being correct.
Yes, I think the requirements change as you delve deeper into your studies. For example, you may believe yourself to be weak in the area of Risk Management and strong in Procurement at the outset of your studies, but after studying for a few days and taking a couple of practice exams, you find yourself to be strong in Risk Management and very weak with the understanding of contracts. In my opinion, at that point, your requirements have changed and you must adapt your approach.
However, as you allude, if you factor in the moments in time that you must reassess and build toward those times, you can definitely proceed incrementally in an iterative fashion. As with so many cases in projects, there are multiple ways to be successful if managed correctly! :-)
Saving Changes...
Scott McEntireProject Manager| MastercardSt. Peters, Mo, United States
Jul 25, 2016 4:47 PM
Replying to Thomas Walenta
...
Hi Scott, why do you think this is not iterative and incremental?
Are there changing requirements or targets?
Thomas... I believe this to be a case of both of those approaches being correct.
Yes, I think the requirements change as you delve deeper into your studies. For example, you may believe yourself to be weak in the area of Risk Management and strong in Procurement at the outset of your studies, but after studying for a few days and taking a couple of practice exams, you find yourself to be strong in Risk Management and very weak with the understanding of contracts. In my opinion, at that point, your requirements have changed and you must adapt your approach.
However, as you allude, if you factor in the moments in time that you must reassess and build toward those times, you can definitely proceed incrementally in an iterative fashion. As with so many cases in projects, there are multiple ways to be successful if managed correctly! :-) Saving Changes...
Tonatiuh OsorioEngineer| proIngeniumTlajomulco De Zuñiga, Jalisco, Mexico
I´m working in Number 3. Iterative and Incremental. It´s my plan, and the exams for a metric.
...
1 reply by Anupam
Jul 26, 2016 1:15 PM
Anupam
...
Thanks Tonatiuh
Saving Changes...
Thomas WalentaGlobal Project Economy ExpertHackenheim, Germany
Hi Scott,
thanks for your reasoning, I do not counterargument here.
Interesting that you say requirements are changing, as far as I understood you, this means the requirements (of passing the exam) as you understand them at each point in time, as the the factual requirements of the exam are set before and do not change. Or maybe you thought about requirements being the gaps between your knowledge and what the exam requires.
...
1 reply by Scott McEntire
Jul 26, 2016 8:45 AM
Scott McEntire
...
Precisely, Thomas. I was thinking in terms of the 5 different knowledge areas, and personal competency in each area.
Saving Changes...
Scott McEntireProject Manager| MastercardSt. Peters, Mo, United States
Jul 26, 2016 2:46 AM
Replying to Thomas Walenta
...
Hi Scott,
thanks for your reasoning, I do not counterargument here.
Interesting that you say requirements are changing, as far as I understood you, this means the requirements (of passing the exam) as you understand them at each point in time, as the the factual requirements of the exam are set before and do not change. Or maybe you thought about requirements being the gaps between your knowledge and what the exam requires.
Precisely, Thomas. I was thinking in terms of the 5 different knowledge areas, and personal competency in each area. Saving Changes...
While I completely agree with treating preparing for the PMP exam as a project, I don’t think Anupam is asking the right question. Preparing for the PMP exam should consist of the following steps:
1) Becoming Eligible to Apply to Take the Exam
• Reviewing the requirements, as defined by PMI.
• Conducting a gap analysis to identify the requirements you meet and do not meet.
• Developing a plan to close the gap(s). This could involve:
o Formal Education or Training Classes
o Work Experience
2) Filling Out the Application
• Review the printable application. This will help you identify the content and format needed for the online application. I recommend this because the online application is only valid for one year (last time I checked).
• Set a date for when you want, and will be eligible, to take the exam – be flexible; you can’t choose the exam date until after your application has been accepted, but you can set a target date to be ready.
• Once you are eligible and are within 1 year of your planned date to take the exam, begin filling out the online application. Update it regularly.
3) Studying for the Exam
• Understand your learning style and tailor your learning experience accordingly.
o Do you learn better from books, videos, audio, or practice questions?
o Do you learn better on your own or in study groups?
o Do you retain information from crash courses, like PMP boot camps?
o Use more than one approach to your studies; it will improve retention.
• Take self-assessments to identify strengths and weaknesses; don’t exclude your strengths from your study program, but give more attention to the areas where you are weakest.
• Keep in mind that the PMP exam is not about how much you know about project management; it’s about how much you know about PMI’s approach to project management.
There may be more to consider; these are just some thoughts to help illustrate my point.
Within each of these steps you have some flexibility, and the steps will likely overlap. You will likely be gaining experience, and possibly education, during the application process. You will also be studying up until a couple of days before you take the exam (give your brain a break a day or two before the exam). You may treat these steps as phases while using an adaptive or iterative approach to your studying. Timeboxes are great, but you may not be able to fit everything within two-week timeboxes.
So what is the right question? I’m not sure that there is one right question, but a better question might be, “What mix of approaches would you use in preparing for the PMP, and how would you use them?”
...
1 reply by Anupam
Jul 26, 2016 10:23 AM
Anupam
...
Aaron thanks for the input.
I will put the above steps in Phase to Phase (Sequential & Overlapping)
While I completely agree with treating preparing for the PMP exam as a project, I don’t think Anupam is asking the right question. Preparing for the PMP exam should consist of the following steps:
1) Becoming Eligible to Apply to Take the Exam
• Reviewing the requirements, as defined by PMI.
• Conducting a gap analysis to identify the requirements you meet and do not meet.
• Developing a plan to close the gap(s). This could involve:
o Formal Education or Training Classes
o Work Experience
2) Filling Out the Application
• Review the printable application. This will help you identify the content and format needed for the online application. I recommend this because the online application is only valid for one year (last time I checked).
• Set a date for when you want, and will be eligible, to take the exam – be flexible; you can’t choose the exam date until after your application has been accepted, but you can set a target date to be ready.
• Once you are eligible and are within 1 year of your planned date to take the exam, begin filling out the online application. Update it regularly.
3) Studying for the Exam
• Understand your learning style and tailor your learning experience accordingly.
o Do you learn better from books, videos, audio, or practice questions?
o Do you learn better on your own or in study groups?
o Do you retain information from crash courses, like PMP boot camps?
o Use more than one approach to your studies; it will improve retention.
• Take self-assessments to identify strengths and weaknesses; don’t exclude your strengths from your study program, but give more attention to the areas where you are weakest.
• Keep in mind that the PMP exam is not about how much you know about project management; it’s about how much you know about PMI’s approach to project management.
There may be more to consider; these are just some thoughts to help illustrate my point.
Within each of these steps you have some flexibility, and the steps will likely overlap. You will likely be gaining experience, and possibly education, during the application process. You will also be studying up until a couple of days before you take the exam (give your brain a break a day or two before the exam). You may treat these steps as phases while using an adaptive or iterative approach to your studying. Timeboxes are great, but you may not be able to fit everything within two-week timeboxes.
So what is the right question? I’m not sure that there is one right question, but a better question might be, “What mix of approaches would you use in preparing for the PMP, and how would you use them?”
Aaron thanks for the input.
I will put the above steps in Phase to Phase (Sequential & Overlapping) Saving Changes...
Thomas WalentaGlobal Project Economy ExpertHackenheim, Germany
I never discard a question as wrong. Even in the exam itself there will be strange questions and somehow you have to find the best answer.
A problem is formulated as it is and if allowed you might have time to rephrase, detail and reframe it. If not, you just deal with that problem and your interpretation of it.
Aaron, your steps 1-3 make up 3 sequential and overlapping phases.
Step 3 itself might be considered iterative and incremental regarding your knowledge and understanding. You should have a target and loop as long in this step 3 until you reached it by learning (target might be you reach 80% or more correct answers in mock exams).
You need a good baseline from where to start, but as you move forward, you should take test exams and identify your strengths and weaknesses. Based on that weaknesses, you should be willing to adjust your studying techniques to focus on the bigger challenges of your learning. You are the key stakeholder in this who can decide when you need to adjust your training, so let your own change requests drive you.