Project Management Central
Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank-you for the link. I enjoy reading various versions of project management, especially from well-established sources such as NASA.
...
1 reply by David Maynard
Sep 09, 2016 5:29 PM
David Maynard
...
Sure thing Wade. All NASA documents are open to the public. There's a really in-depth risk standard too that includes a section on "risk-based decision making." http://go.nasa.gov/2bZWUeo.
![]()
Rami Kaibni
![]()
Thanks David - This is very interesting. I will definitely go through it in details although it is 400+ Pages.
![]()
David Maynard
Fort Wayne, In, USA
Rami, I've considered a series of articles for PMI called: "Growing up Project." I didn't know there was another way of doing for decades. One thing that's an important difference from the PMBOK guide is the NASA standard requires - a monthly review, it specifies what needs to be discussed, the and PM is responsible for the meeting.
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Sep 09, 2016 10:36 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
David, I agree and probably this monthly review is due to the high sensitivity of the operations that NASA runs.
![]()
David Maynard
Fort Wayne, In, USA
Sep 09, 2016 2:55 PM
Replying to Wade Harshman
...
Thank-you for the link. I enjoy reading various versions of project management, especially from well-established sources such as NASA.
...
1 reply by Vincent Guerard
Oct 02, 2016 9:35 PM
Vincent Guerard
...
Thanks David
I have some reading to do. I will go through both documents. I will search the site if there is more on subject such as compliance, governance. ![]()
Anupam
India
Hi David, thanks for sharing.
There is lot of information to download, 486 pages to read. ![]()
Rami Kaibni
![]() Sep 09, 2016 5:24 PM
Replying to David Maynard
...
Rami, I've considered a series of articles for PMI called: "Growing up Project." I didn't know there was another way of doing for decades. One thing that's an important difference from the PMBOK guide is the NASA standard requires - a monthly review, it specifies what needs to be discussed, the and PM is responsible for the meeting.
![]()
Sergio Luis Conte
Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations
Buenos Aires, Argentina
As far as I know SpaceX and NASA would not be compared (I am not saying you are doing that David. I never worked in NASA. I am only a researcher as a result to see the man on the moon in 1969). But I think there is a very interesting point behind your post. I think that most of us around the world are facing the same question: "Why come I spent so much money when this other can do it for next to nothing or cheaper?". Mainly in the currently open world and globalized world. And as allways we need to demostrate value. But the problem here is that value is a subjective matters we need to conver into objective ones. NASA deliver a lot of value to the world. In fact, we are working in this type of spaces thanks to lot of things delivered by NASA research.
![]()
Interesting. Thanks David for sharing.
![]()
Nadia Vincent
Digital Transformation Executive Advisor, IT Management Consultant (MBA)| DigitalTransformationLeaders.com
Brussels, Na, Belgium
Very interesting!
Thank you for sharing David! Nadia ![]() Sep 09, 2016 5:29 PM
Replying to David Maynard
...
Sure thing Wade. All NASA documents are open to the public. There's a really in-depth risk standard too that includes a section on "risk-based decision making." http://go.nasa.gov/2bZWUeo.
I have some reading to do. I will go through both documents. I will search the site if there is more on subject such as compliance, governance. |
Please login or join to reply
ADVERTISEMENTS
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." - Douglas Adams |