Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

GROUND RULES

linkedin twitter facebook   Communications Management   Leadership  
avatar
LORI WILSON RETIRED - Technical Project Manager| RETIRED - LifePoint Health Clarkston, Wa, United States
What are your favorite meeting ground rules?
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
avatar
Nasrullah Mohammed Portfolio Manager| Advanced Electronics Company Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
We can remove all the chairs in the meeting room and hold stand up meetings. It will make them shorter and stick to their agenda. :D
...
1 reply by LORI WILSON
Mar 13, 2017 11:12 AM
LORI WILSON
...
Hi Nasrullah: I like stand up meetings as well. How often do you have stand up meetings vs. sit down meetings?
avatar
Naomi Caietti Senior Project Manager | ePMO | Higher Education | Healthcare & IT| Linkedin.com/In/NaomiCaietti
Elect a timekeeper and note taker.
...
1 reply by LORI WILSON
Mar 13, 2017 11:13 AM
LORI WILSON
...
Hi Naomi: Having a designated timekeeper and note taker are both very important. I am usually doing both of those and leading the meetings. Does that happen to as well? It is hard to do all three well at the same time.
avatar
Ed Tsyitee Jr Consultant | Consultant Tucson, Az, United States
My favorite ground rule for meetings is don't have them unless absolutely necessary. Can the information be communicated some other way then waste people's time? If you need to have a meeting invite those that are mission critical or essential to the task/project. And, stick to the agenda and a strict time limit.
I've heard that if a meeting lasts longer than 1 hour, it wasn't worth it in the first place.
...
1 reply by LORI WILSON
Mar 13, 2017 11:16 AM
LORI WILSON
...
Hi Ed;

You are exactly right! How often have you been in a meeting and thought - this whole meeting is a waste of time! The information could have been shared in a quick visual or an e-mail! Especially when you calculate the cost of a meeting - our hospital leadership is asking that we all check the cost of a meeting before scheduling it to be sure our time is worth the cost. What is your favorite method of checking to be sure a meeting is worth it before even scheduling it? I like to only have meetings that deal with the present or the future - if it was in the past, then I think it is a status report and the information should be shared in another way. What are your thoughts on this?
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
An other ground rule I have follow is respect the announced end time.
...
1 reply by LORI WILSON
Mar 13, 2017 11:17 AM
LORI WILSON
...
Vincent - you are exactly right. My personal pet peeve is when meetings do not start and do not end on time. We need to be respectful of the attendees time and their schedules!
avatar
LORI WILSON RETIRED - Technical Project Manager| RETIRED - LifePoint Health Clarkston, Wa, United States
Mar 10, 2017 2:47 PM
Replying to Sungjoon Park
...
aware of agenda prior to attending the meeting.
Hi Sungjoon - I really like that one too! How far in advance of meetings do you send out your agenda? I always try to send out 24-hours in advance if possible.
...
1 reply by Sungjoon Park
Mar 14, 2017 11:42 AM
Sungjoon Park
...
You're right. Meeting agenda should be communicated before meetings held. My point is that memebers should actively participate in discussion. Well knowing agenda is the first step to lead active and effective discussion.
avatar
LORI WILSON RETIRED - Technical Project Manager| RETIRED - LifePoint Health Clarkston, Wa, United States
Mar 11, 2017 3:00 AM
Replying to Nasrullah Mohammed
...
We can remove all the chairs in the meeting room and hold stand up meetings. It will make them shorter and stick to their agenda. :D
Hi Nasrullah: I like stand up meetings as well. How often do you have stand up meetings vs. sit down meetings?
...
1 reply by Nasrullah Mohammed
Mar 14, 2017 4:30 AM
Nasrullah Mohammed
...
Lori - The whole team meets every day for a quick status update limited to between five and fifteen minutes and we call it the daily huddle. Each member answers the following three questions:
1) What did you do yesterday?
2) What will you do today?
3) Are there any impediments in your way?
The stand-up is not meant to be a place to solve problems, but rather to make the team aware of current status. If discussion is needed, a longer meeting with appropriate parties can be arranged.
avatar
LORI WILSON RETIRED - Technical Project Manager| RETIRED - LifePoint Health Clarkston, Wa, United States
Mar 11, 2017 5:48 PM
Replying to Naomi Caietti
...
Elect a timekeeper and note taker.
Hi Naomi: Having a designated timekeeper and note taker are both very important. I am usually doing both of those and leading the meetings. Does that happen to as well? It is hard to do all three well at the same time.
...
1 reply by Naomi Caietti
Mar 13, 2017 1:47 PM
Naomi Caietti
...
Lori:
There are so many ways to lead effective meetings and streamline your processes.
You will be more effective facilitator of your meetings when you set ground rules like assigning meeting and time keeper. This is a great role for a PC coordinator and your team members. Also, many team members like to disrupt your meetings; give them something to do by assigning these roles.
avatar
LORI WILSON RETIRED - Technical Project Manager| RETIRED - LifePoint Health Clarkston, Wa, United States
Mar 11, 2017 6:46 PM
Replying to Ed Tsyitee Jr
...
My favorite ground rule for meetings is don't have them unless absolutely necessary. Can the information be communicated some other way then waste people's time? If you need to have a meeting invite those that are mission critical or essential to the task/project. And, stick to the agenda and a strict time limit.
I've heard that if a meeting lasts longer than 1 hour, it wasn't worth it in the first place.
Hi Ed;

You are exactly right! How often have you been in a meeting and thought - this whole meeting is a waste of time! The information could have been shared in a quick visual or an e-mail! Especially when you calculate the cost of a meeting - our hospital leadership is asking that we all check the cost of a meeting before scheduling it to be sure our time is worth the cost. What is your favorite method of checking to be sure a meeting is worth it before even scheduling it? I like to only have meetings that deal with the present or the future - if it was in the past, then I think it is a status report and the information should be shared in another way. What are your thoughts on this?
...
1 reply by Ed Tsyitee Jr
Mar 13, 2017 2:33 PM
Ed Tsyitee Jr
...
I think status reports are best left to e-mails or UNLESS it's an active status report. For example, working on a task or tasks the project or team lead needs to know how everyone is doing do they need help etc. But once a task is completed, that report can be sent out to the pertinent people.
I think if there are less than 10 people for a meeting, it probably isn't worth it. And of those 10, all of them have to have some influence or impact on the project and or task. Also, look at the information. All of it. Can it be given out some other way or is face to face the best way?
avatar
LORI WILSON RETIRED - Technical Project Manager| RETIRED - LifePoint Health Clarkston, Wa, United States
Mar 11, 2017 7:25 PM
Replying to Vincent Guerard
...
An other ground rule I have follow is respect the announced end time.
Vincent - you are exactly right. My personal pet peeve is when meetings do not start and do not end on time. We need to be respectful of the attendees time and their schedules!
avatar
Mayte Mata Sivera PMO Leader | Speaker | Author Ut, United States
One fun rule, a swear jar.

I the last project that I worked, during a VP meetings the organizer bring a swear jar.
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"If you think you've hit a false note, sing loud. When in doubt, sing loud."

- Robert Merrill

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors