Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Business Case

linkedin twitter facebook   Estimating  
avatar
Arnold Candelaria Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
I'm now in the middle of software package selection process and I've been told that I need to write a business case for my project. I'm considering two or three packages currently. I made an ROI statement for the business case using net present value techniques, internal rate of return and payback period. I've been told to make the same computation for each vendor I'm considering but I tend to disagree with that. Does anyone know if I should make a business case / ROI statement for each of the vendors I'm considering? To me I should just have one business case using my own cost estimates and benefit calculation. Appreciate your thoughts on the matter.

Cheers.
Sort By:
avatar
Mark Price Perry Business Driven PMO Evangelist| BOT International Orlando, Fl, United States

Dear Arnold,


Regarding should one make a business case / ROI statement for each of the vendors being considered... Most of the PMOs we work with have a vendor selection process and vendor selection scorecard that serves to rank the best choice vendor amongst a number of key selection criteria. No doubt, financial criteria weighs in, but there are also other criteria important to the overall rank. The purpose of the scorecard is to facilitate selecting the best vendor, not to be the business case for the project. If management would like to change the vendor selection scorecard to provide additional financial metrics, then that is fine. However, this is a vendor selction effort, not the business case for the project. Typically, vendor selection scorecards are most effective when the number of criteria is not too many nor not too few. If there are too many criteria, say 15 points of analysis, then each of the criteria tend to be of little importance to the overall weighting. Likewise, if there are too few criteria, say 3 points of analysis, then any single criteria can potentially out weigh the other two. Typically, most organizations employ five to seven criteria in their vendor selection scorecard such as:



  • Overall costs of vendor solution

  • Vendor understanding of needs

  • Vendor technical capability

  • Vendor management approach

  • Vendor financial capability


There could be other and/or different criteria. The idea is that all the vendor alternatives are evaluated fairly and against criteria most important to the company for a successful vendor selection, procurement, and implementation. If you were to add NPV, IRR, and Payback to your vendor selection criteria, you might run the risk of having the collective financial criteria dominant all of the other vendor selection criteria. Again, if this is what management wants to do, then that is their call. But it seems that management simply liked your financial analysis and would like to see it done for the other vendors. Hence, that is the value of having an agreed to vendor selection process and scorecard, even a simple one. You save time by not having to re-think your analysis approach for each project and you eliminate waste by not having to rework and/or redo your analyses. Cheers.


Mark Perry


VP of Customer Care


BOT International

avatar
Joe Mooney Senior Technology Project Manager| Independent Consultant Oviedo, Fl, United States
I have used a modification of the attached spreadsheet to help with many product selection engagements. Of course while the tool is helpful, the trick is figuring out what the key criteria are that help you to develop a score. This scorecard can be modified rather easily and should help you narrow down the selection based on high-level requirements.

Use the Weight Factor to determine which criteria are key to the need. The overall score on the summary page indicates how the choices match up. Changes to the second tab are reflected on the subsequent tabs.

In this example, we were evaluating document archival and retrieval systems for a client. They chose the functionality that was to be evaluated and our consultants did the research to determine the scoring for each product.

If you have questions, please let me know.

Joe Mooney
PBS&J Management Solutions

avatar
Daire Guiney Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
I would cover all the options as you are not the one making decision but only providing all the information that you been asked to provide for somebody else to make the decision. By leaving out two of the three vendors in the final decision making process may raise some questions of outside interference in the selection process. In the end you be asked to provide the Business case for the three vendors that should be impartial so this is what I would recommend you doing.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

It's the old gag: people that pay for things never complain. It's the guy you give something to that you can't please.

- Will Rogers

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors