Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
If you search into the new PMBOK you will not find any reference to Agile project management, Agile project manager, and Agile something. Lot of work was done for avoiding it. Why? For example, in my actual work place, we have five different life cycle models defined and two of them are inside a method (DSDM) and a framework (Scrum) both based on Agile. The same project manager is working at the same time leading projects using Agile based life cycle and non-Agile based. They can do that because they understand that you have a way to perform project management (for example as stated by the PMI) into quit diferent environments (Agile, Lean, Predictive, etc). That means, if you follow PMI, you always has to take into acount scope, quality, risk, time, cost, etc, etc. Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
Dec 12, 2017 11:29 PM
Replying to Ezara Penning
...
Agile is a project management methodology that uses short development cycles called "sprints" to focus on continuous improvement when developing a product or service.
The Project Management Institute (PMI) states "Agile approaches to project management aim for early, measurable ROI through defined, iterative delivery of product increments. They feature continuous involvement of the customer throughout the product development cycle. Although agile has its roots in software and IT, agile adoption is growing and expanding in a wide range of industries." https://www.pmi.org/learning/featured-topics/agile
Agile is not a methodology. Agile is totally independent of a methodology. Agile is not an approach. You have approaches based on Agile. What the PMI is trying to say is that when you use some approach based on Agile then you have to take into account incremental delivery. In fact, you can read it into the new PMBOK where the PMI took an "elegant" and salomonic decision in defining the life cycle including a embeded phase named "development" and a new life cycle model named "agile" based on iterative-incremental life cycle process. Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
Dec 12, 2017 11:59 PM
Replying to SHADAV MOHAMMAD ANSARI
...
AGILE methodology is a practice that promotes continuous iteration of development and testing throughout the software development lifecycle of the project. Both development and testing activities are concurrent.
Agile based methods promote what you stated. Those methods becomes today solution delivery methods so you can use it for any type of product. Saving Changes...
Ezara PenningSystems Administrator I| Lincoln Land Community CollegeSpringfield, Il, United States
Dec 13, 2017 9:26 AM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
JAJAJAJJA, Thank you very much my friends. Here I am. First of all, I always comment about Agile because I firmly believe that the general confusion outside there jeopardizes the work for all of us and mainly the intentions of people that are trying to find a job. All I will write as follows can be checked and my only objective is that: search for the basement and the real information. Here I comes. By definition, the definition created in 1990 inside the USA DoD NSF/Agility Forum and then taking by creators of methods for software development based on Agile (I worked with some of them like Arie Van Bennekum) Agile is "a way of behave and thinking with focus on client and quality". When you use behave Agile then you gain into agility which is "the ability to respond to changes and to create changes". That is the reason because Agile is not the same of Lean, while Agile was born trying as an innovation on Lean.
Sergio, thank you for the correction, it is greatly appreciated. My apologies for posting incorrect information.
My Agile course focused on it being a "methodology" rather than a behavior or way of thinking. What I learned in the course made Agile seem rather cumbersome and not agile at all. Thank you for providing me with this information, I am now beginning to understand what Agile really is. :-)
...
2 replies by Ezara Penning and Sergio Luis Conte
Dec 13, 2017 2:45 PM
Sergio Luis Conte
...
Ezara, please do not apologize. Thanks God I do not own the truth. My intention is contributing to move people to search other things sometimes are not known. Why? Because in my personal opinion in the near future is no way to survive as project manager by adding value if we do not participate in helping organizations to gain into agility. The way is to understand we can do that taking the actual situation and working on modifying the actual architecture. I am leading my seventh initiative on the field.
Dec 13, 2017 3:32 PM
Ezara Penning
...
Sergio, thank you for the "eureka" moment. Much of my learning has been focused on the details that I have not been able to see the overarching problem and how to identify and then remedy it. I have definitely learned a lot today!
Saving Changes...
Mansoor MustafaSenior PM| Government DepartmentRawalpindi Punjab, Pakistan
Agree with Peter and Kiron, it is mainly mindset and principle to get work done Saving Changes...
Mansoor MustafaSenior PM| Government DepartmentRawalpindi Punjab, Pakistan
My colleagues have already highlighted the exact meaning and frame work of agile. Just that is agility of mindset Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
Dec 13, 2017 10:36 AM
Replying to Ezara Penning
...
Sergio, thank you for the correction, it is greatly appreciated. My apologies for posting incorrect information.
My Agile course focused on it being a "methodology" rather than a behavior or way of thinking. What I learned in the course made Agile seem rather cumbersome and not agile at all. Thank you for providing me with this information, I am now beginning to understand what Agile really is. :-)
Ezara, please do not apologize. Thanks God I do not own the truth. My intention is contributing to move people to search other things sometimes are not known. Why? Because in my personal opinion in the near future is no way to survive as project manager by adding value if we do not participate in helping organizations to gain into agility. The way is to understand we can do that taking the actual situation and working on modifying the actual architecture. I am leading my seventh initiative on the field. Saving Changes...
I have to recognize that I opened this question looking for them too. :)
...
1 reply by Sergio Luis Conte
Dec 13, 2017 3:25 PM
Sergio Luis Conte
...
Jajajaja. As I mentioned, thanks God or any other force you believe governs the Universe I do not own the truth. For some fortuitous questions of destiny I was involved into the group that started from the genesis with some topics that are today "buzzwords": Agile, Business Analysis and not from the genesis but close to it into AI, Big Data and all related to today Digital Transformation. I firmly believe that using it as buzzwords jeopardizes the work of everybody. So, I can direct people to the basement and then people can take its own decisions. Believe me, besides the "academic" side I have to work with those items in the field to bring the bread to my table.
Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
Dec 13, 2017 3:19 PM
Replying to Mayte Mata Sivera
...
I have to recognize that I opened this question looking for them too. :)
Jajajaja. As I mentioned, thanks God or any other force you believe governs the Universe I do not own the truth. For some fortuitous questions of destiny I was involved into the group that started from the genesis with some topics that are today "buzzwords": Agile, Business Analysis and not from the genesis but close to it into AI, Big Data and all related to today Digital Transformation. I firmly believe that using it as buzzwords jeopardizes the work of everybody. So, I can direct people to the basement and then people can take its own decisions. Believe me, besides the "academic" side I have to work with those items in the field to bring the bread to my table. Saving Changes...
Ezara PenningSystems Administrator I| Lincoln Land Community CollegeSpringfield, Il, United States
Dec 13, 2017 10:36 AM
Replying to Ezara Penning
...
Sergio, thank you for the correction, it is greatly appreciated. My apologies for posting incorrect information.
My Agile course focused on it being a "methodology" rather than a behavior or way of thinking. What I learned in the course made Agile seem rather cumbersome and not agile at all. Thank you for providing me with this information, I am now beginning to understand what Agile really is. :-)
Sergio, thank you for the "eureka" moment. Much of my learning has been focused on the details that I have not been able to see the overarching problem and how to identify and then remedy it. I have definitely learned a lot today!
...
1 reply by Sergio Luis Conte
Dec 13, 2017 3:39 PM
Sergio Luis Conte
...
You are welcome. My recommendation is taking a look to USA DoD NSF/Agility Forum deliverables or searching into the internet for Rick Dove´s work "Response Ability" because it contains most of the results due to Rick was the program manager on charge of the forum.