Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

5 Strategies for threats in project risk management

linkedin twitter facebook   Governance   Risk Management  
avatar
JOONMIN SUH Project Engineering Manager| Samsung Construction & Trading Seongnam, Gyeonggi, South Korea
PMBOK Guide 6ed added "Escalate" strategy with the existing 4 strategies; "Avoid", "Transfer", "Mitigate" and "Accept", to deal with threats.
These 4 strategies can be grouped into following 2 categories;
- Proactive: "Avoid", "Mitigate". They can decrease the probability and/or impact of negative risks, in order to optimize the chances of project success as mentioned in the guide.
- Active: "Transfer", "Accept". They do not remove the known risks but can be considered.
How about the "Escalate"? "Proactive" or "Active"?
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
I will write my position. Take into account that I wrote I am in disagreement with the PMBOK stated about this topic and in fact I will not use the definition. If you search into governance models you will find the exact meaning of scalation including the porcentage of recommended issues/risk to scalate to top levels inside the organizational pyramid or project structure pyramid. With all that said, I think is not about how we think or interpreting it. If we will follow the PMBOK then the definition is clear inside the PMBOK not matter I do not agree.
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
To me when you transfer you give the risk to an other entities using a contract.

Escalate is within your organisation you ask people with different authorities responsibility to deal with the risk. For example the PM will ask the sponsor. The risk stay in the project.
avatar
MEHRAN KHALILNEJADI Risk manager| CHAGALESH CONSULTING ENGINEERS Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic of)
the need for it comes from the
he necessity of filling the register. how can you specify the situation for risks which you do not possess authority to take care of? since it might happen in real project there has to be an answer for it.
however i think it can be grouped as the passive sort of responses since it takes place befor its trigger.
avatar
JOONMIN SUH Project Engineering Manager| Samsung Construction & Trading Seongnam, Gyeonggi, South Korea
Dec 15, 2017 1:08 AM
Replying to SHADAV MOHAMMAD ANSARI
...
1-Risk buffering (or risk hedging) is the establishment of some reserve or buffer that can absorb the effects of many risks without jeopardizing the project. A contingency is one example of a buffer.
2-Risk avoidance is the elimination or avoidance of some risk, or class of risks, by changing the parameters of the project.
3-Risk control refers to assuming a risk but taking steps to reduce, mitigate, or otherwise manage its impact or likelihood.
4-Risk Transfer and Contracting re is a common adage about risk management that the owner should allocate risks to the parties best able to manage them.
5-Risk Mitigation includes reduction of the likelihood that a risk event will occur and/or reduction of the effect of a risk event if it does occur.
Hi Shadav, the 4 strategies are exactly match with yours as follows.
1-Risk buffering Accept
2-Risk avoidance Avoid
4-Risk Transfer Transfer
5-Risk Mitigation Mitigate
"3-Risk control" seems contingency for "unkown risk"; "assuming a risk". Thank you for your comment.
Joonmin
avatar
JOONMIN SUH Project Engineering Manager| Samsung Construction & Trading Seongnam, Gyeonggi, South Korea
Dec 15, 2017 1:21 AM
Replying to Deepesh Rammoorthy
...
I have read that "Escalate" seems to be a strategy to give the risk to someone else so that it's out of your hands. Sounds innocuously similar to Transfer. If you give the risk to someone , it is still active ....for them....not just for you...
Thank you Deepesh, yes, "Escalate" seems like "Transfer" of the risk not agreement/contract but acceptance of the relevant party.
Joonmin
avatar
JOONMIN SUH Project Engineering Manager| Samsung Construction & Trading Seongnam, Gyeonggi, South Korea
Dec 15, 2017 5:58 AM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
There was a lot of debate inside the group of authors and reviewers of the PMBOK about this topic. People like me do not agree to include escalation as an strategy because escalation belongs to project governance and it is used as an action that could be taken for all project management items inside your projects. When something exceeds the level of decision/resolution of the project team you have to put it under program/portfolio management consideration or under somebody consideration with a higher level of decision/resolution to help you. But the item still remains under your scope of management as project manager. You need to control activities to take an answer. If you read the PMBOK in the risk session that is not what the PMBOK stated. What PMBOK stated is close to say "this risk does not corresponds to me". So, in my personal opinion, that is not a strategy. Is an action to change the state of a indenfied risk.
Thank you Sergio.
Your comment is very clear and agree with your answer.
I think project manager and team will endeavor to identify the risks inside the scope of the project and PM shall put it under program/portfolio management level as you mentioned.
I like your approach.
Joonmin
...
1 reply by Sergio Luis Conte
Dec 17, 2017 9:24 PM
Sergio Luis Conte
...
You are welcome. Is what I did from years including right now.
avatar
JOONMIN SUH Project Engineering Manager| Samsung Construction & Trading Seongnam, Gyeonggi, South Korea
Dec 15, 2017 8:16 AM
Replying to Eric Simms
...
A description I found for 'escalation' is as follows:
"Risk escalation is used when a project team identifies a risk that does not belong within the scope of their project, because it would not affect any project objective, but it could affect someone else."

Notifying another department about a risk that could affect them is just good business or professional consideration, but I wouldn’t describe it as a ‘risk strategy’.
Thank you Eric, I agree with your idea. In addition, PM and project team shall identify and perform risk analysis the risks within the scope of their project based on the risk management plan.
Joonmin
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
Dec 17, 2017 6:46 PM
Replying to JOONMIN SUH
...
Thank you Sergio.
Your comment is very clear and agree with your answer.
I think project manager and team will endeavor to identify the risks inside the scope of the project and PM shall put it under program/portfolio management level as you mentioned.
I like your approach.
Joonmin
You are welcome. Is what I did from years including right now.
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"In youth we learn; in age we understand."

- Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors