Spelling and grammatical errors along with structural changes occur throughout all of these posts. Shouldn't the person who makes the post have the opportunity to edit them? Saving Changes...
Drew CraigSr. Agile & Product Coach| VanguardPhiladelphia, Pa, United States
This has been mentioned before. It certainly would be reasonable, but for now, a limitation of the platform I suppose. I'll bet we will see some further improvements in the coming [x] time frame, but for now, a second or third post to correct mistakes will have to do. Saving Changes...
All the more reason to keep reminding everyone :-) Saving Changes...
Jason JafarianApplication Developer| IBMWashington, Dc, United States
I'm not sure. However, I have noticed this as a recurring trend on professional sites lately (Scrum.org and LinkedIn do the same thing). The ability to edit our content after posting is not some new functionality; message boards and online forums have implemented this for well over a decade now.
I'd like to think there's a reason, but I can't seem to figure out what it is.
...
1 reply by Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
Mar 25, 2018 4:46 PM
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
Jason, finding out their logic for not allowing it would one be one half of the puzzle. The second half of the puzzle is why do they allow it for discussion posts like this one we are in right now.
I'm not sure. However, I have noticed this as a recurring trend on professional sites lately (Scrum.org and LinkedIn do the same thing). The ability to edit our content after posting is not some new functionality; message boards and online forums have implemented this for well over a decade now.
I'd like to think there's a reason, but I can't seem to figure out what it is.
Jason, finding out their logic for not allowing it would one be one half of the puzzle. The second half of the puzzle is why do they allow it for discussion posts like this one we are in right now. Saving Changes...