Can we call ourselves Project Management Practitioners, Project Management strategist instead of Project Managers, a kind of playing it a bit with words to play it low key?
Can you tell the difference? Saving Changes...
Sort By:
PANKAJ PANDEYPROJECT PLANNING MANAGER| TATA PROJECTSMirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Yes, I would be agreed with you and I feel that you concept is almost ok because PMBOK defines the Project as temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service. This uniqueness tends towards learning something new and this learning present you as a practitioner to become more experienced Project Manager. Saving Changes...
I'm a call a spade a spade person so I think the more we shy away from naming our roles what they actually are, the more we marginalize the profession. I haven't seen engineers, lawyers or doctors using watered down titles, so why should we?
Not legitimizing the title in a company would be a sign of low organizational PM maturity...
Kiron Saving Changes...
ahmad qaramanProject Control Manager| Ramz Kayan ContractingRiyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Practitioners is a logical development of the project manager while strategist could be more like a portfolio manager.
Strategy without projects is just another document collecting dust. Projects without strategic importance quickly lose their appeal Saving Changes...
"I do not know anyone who has got to the top without hard work. That is the recipe. It will not always get you to the top, but should get you pretty near."
