Why PMOs Are Still Necessary...and Redundant
Following 20 years at a large Canadian telecommunications firm, Bruce established the project management consulting firm Solutions Management Inc (SMI). Since 1999, he has provided contract project/program management services, been a source for project management support personnel and created/delivered courses to over 7,000 participants in Canada, the United States and England.
In my early years of being an independent PM consultant, I had a desire to specialize in creating and managing project management offices. My goal was to leverage my years of experience leading a large team of project managers in the corporate world. There were fewer opportunities to provide this service than I had hoped.
A couple of decades later, I find myself pondering that if I was starting my consulting business now, would there be a market for creating PMOs?
The relevance and necessity of a project management office in contemporary organizations is a topic of debate. As businesses evolve to adapt to new challenges in an increasingly dynamic environment, the role of the PMO has been called into question.
On one hand, a PMO provides structured oversight, strategic alignment, and resource management capabilities, which are critical for project success.
On the other, critics argue that PMOs can be overly bureaucratic and stifle innovation. The relevance of a PMO may also vary depending on the organization’s size and complexity.
This analysis will explore three key reasons why PMOs remain necessary…and two reasons why they might be considered redundant or counterproductive (with special consideration for the impact of organizational size).
Why PMOs are Still Necessary
1. Strategic alignment and governance: A PMO plays a pivotal role in …
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
|
"Be Yourself" is about the worst advice you can give to people. - Mark Twain |
