The Next Ethical Frontier: Why AI Can’t Replace Judgment
Jim Highsmith is co-author of the Agile Manifesto with 60 years of experience as an IT manager, product manager, project manager, consultant, software developer, and agile pioneer.
We were in the war room. Screens glowed. Coffee steamed. The algorithm had just flagged a critical supply-chain risk no one saw coming.
Then someone said, almost under their breath:
“The system makes the tough calls now.”
The room went still.
It wasn’t said with arrogance—more a kind of quiet relief.
But the sentence echoed. It sounded efficient—yet somehow like the beginning of something quietly dangerous.
When Decision-Making Feels Too Easy
Early in my career, I used to envy precision. Projects failed because people argued too long, trusted too little, or hesitated at the wrong moment. AI promised a different world—clean data, crisp logic, and freedom from bias.
And for a while, it delivered. Dashboards glowed green. Forecasts grew sharper. Rework declined. But slowly, something else declined, too—conversation. We began to defer, not decide. “The model recommends” replaced “What do you think?”
We told ourselves we were saving time. In truth, we were surrendering experience.
Ethical erosion rarely begins with intent. It begins with convenience. Delegating judgment feels productive—until we realize it’s eroding the very capability that makes leaders human.
Where Judgment Comes From
Over the years, I’ve come to see capability as a simple equation:
Capability = …
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
|
"The man who views the world at 50 the same as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali |
