When 'Everything Was Green'...But the Program Was Already Failing

Muhammad Qasim Bhatti is Director Program Management & Governance at Speridian Technologies.

  Change Management   Governance   Program Management  

In one enterprise digital transformation program I managed, the project status dashboard looked perfect. Milestones were on track, budget variance was minimal, and the steering committee received detailed status reports every month. On paper, everything was progressing exactly as planned.

Yet within a year, the program quietly stalled. Adoption never materialized. Business teams bypassed the new system. The transformation the organization had invested in simply didn’t happen.

The uncomfortable answer to “What went wrong?” was this: Our governance structure was excellent at reporting past activity, but was not designed for picking up on the organizational signals that predicted future failure post go-live.

We were measuring delivery; we weren’t measuring whether the business was genuinely moving in the same direction of the agreed benefit realization.

The Limits of Delivery Metrics

Traditional program governance relies on familiar indicators: schedule performance, budget variance, milestone completion, risk logs. These are essential tools, and I’m not suggesting we set them aside. But they are, by their nature, backward-looking. They confirm that work was completed. They don’t tell you whether the intended value will actually be realized.

In large transformation programs, that distinction becomes critical. A project can hit …

Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.