6 Steering Committee Questions to Retire...and 6 to Replace Them
Do this arithmetic with me. It takes 10 seconds and it will ruin your next steering committee.
Bent Flyvbjerg’s Oxford database holds more than 16,000 large projects—the biggest of its kind anywhere. Three numbers come out of it:
- 47.9% of those projects came in on budget.
- 8.5% came in on budget and on time.
- 0.5% came in on budget, on time and delivered the benefits they were promised.
Now divide. Among the projects that hit the two targets we celebrate—the ones that get the congratulatory email, the ones that go on the slide—fewer than one in 15 actually delivered the value they were funded to create.
Sit with that. Not the failures. The successes.
We have built a profession, a certification industry and several billion dollars of software around a definition of success that is very nearly uncorrelated with the reason the money was spent. And the reason it survives is embarrassingly simple.
Nobody ever got fired for being on track.
Green is safe. Green is defensible. Green is a question you can answer with a system export at 4 p.m. on a Thursday. Value is a question that takes 18 months to answer, by which time the project manager has moved on, the sponsor has been promoted, and the file is closed.
So we ask the safe question, forever, and we call it governance.
What follows are six questions I would like you to retire
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
|
"Impartial observers from other planets would consider ours an utterly bizarre enclave if it were populated by birds, defined as flying animals, that nevertheless rarely or never actually flew. They would also be perplexed if they encountered in our seas, lakes, rivers and ponds, creatures defined as swimmers that never did any swimming. But they would be even more surprised to encounter a species defined as a thinking animal if, in fact, the creature very rarely indulged in actual thinking." - Steve Allen |




