Lessons From the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire (Part 10)

Jerry Manas, PMP - July 16, 2003

We've explored the principles and elements that led to the rise of the Roman Empire and have applied these lessons to modern day project management. Now let's examine the decline of the

Roman Empire and see what lessons are in store for us there. As we did with the rise of the empire, we will first spend time examining the chronological history, so we can see exactly how Rome  fell. Then, in our next installment, we will examine how we can apply the lessons to modern project management.

 

The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

If you recall, the last good Emperor that the Romans had was Marcus Aurelius (ably portrayed by Richard Harris in the film Gladiator). After the death of Marcus Aurelius in 180 A.D., everything went downhill. A string of mostly bad emperors followed, beginning with Commodus (played by Joaquin Phoenix in the film, although the film was only partly factual). After Commodus (and after two very short-lived and completely inept emperors, Pertinax and Didius Julianus), the mostly poor-to-mediocre Severan Dynasty ruled for about 50 years (including the Emperor Caracalla, known mostly for his extravagant public baths and spas).

 

The important thing is that during all this time, with constant threats along the perimeter of the empire, power was shifting from Rome  to the Roman provinces responsible for defense along the borders. This eventually led to a period of military generals from these provinces taking control (the so-called "barracks emperors"). Civil wars alone nearly tore apart the empire, as various army factions nominated and backed their own rulers. For 30 years, there was a pattern of generals becoming emperor, and then being murdered to make way for another. To make matters worse, the economy was weak as well.

 

Splitting Heirs

Fortunately, in 284 A.D., Diocletian--the last of the barracks emperors (but much more effective than the ones before him)--finally made reforms that once again brought order to the empire. He enlarged the army and gave them power of administration. He increased security and restored stability after years of civil war.

 

Unfortunately, he also shared the narcissistic tendencies of Caesar and began to perceive himself as a deity. In addition, he ended up raising taxes considerably to fund the large army and resources to support it. This, combined with the poor economy, caused much dissention among the masses.

 

In 286 A.D., he made what many feel to be the first mistake that ultimately led to the fall of the empire (there were several more made by others). He decided that, since Rome grew so large and unmanageable, it should be divided into an Eastern and Western Empire . This was a fatal mistake and was the beginning of the end, as conflict would inevitably follow.

 

Constantine , and the Rise of Constantinople

In 311, after conflicts did indeed arise between heirs to the separate divisions of the Roman Empire , Constantine --one of the heirs--marched into Rome to assert what he felt was his right to the throne. He emerged as the sole emperor of both the Eastern and Western Empire in 324.

 

Constantine continued and furthered the military and administrative reforms started by Diocletian (and unfortunately the associated taxes as well). He improved security and built lavishly, recalling some of the old glory of Rome at its peak. However, his most lasting achievement was that he ruled as a Christian (whereas Christians were persecuted under Diocletian's rule), establishing Christianity as the official religion of Rome , and thus the Western world. Christianity had been spreading through Rome  since the days of Nero, but it was now official.

 

In 330, Constantine moved the capital east to the Greek city of Byzantium, which he renamed Constantinople. Constantine took the best Roman artisans, politicians and public figures with him, knowing that, with the barbarians closing in, the city of Rome was vulnerable to attack.

 

For all intents and purposes, Constantinople was the new Rome . In fact, for a time it was even called Nova Roma, or New Rome. Rome had become second fiddle.

 

A House Divided--Four More Times

When Constantine  died in 337, he divided the empire among his sons. When they died, their cousin Julian became the sole emperor, who, turning back the clock, restored paganism in place of Christianity. When he died in 363 (killed in battle), a series of Christian emperors ruled, thus restoring Christianity as the religion of the empire. One of these emperors, Valentinian I, gave control over the Eastern Empire to his brother, Valens, thus dividing the empire into two halves once again.

 

Around this time, the Huns, a barbarian tribe from Asia, were attacking and forcing the barbarian Gallic and Germanic tribes--including the Visigoths, Vandals, Saxons, Franks and others--to migrate west. When the Visigoths sought refuge from the Eastern Emperor, Valens, he accommodated them by giving them shelter within Roman territory (on the Roman side of the Danube River). However, he treated them badly and they rebelled, eventually killing Valens in 378 in the Battle of Adrianople.

 

Many consider Valens' accommodation of the Visigoths as the second major mistake that led to Rome 's downfall (the first being the division of the empire), as the barbarians were now truly "within the gate."

 

With Valens dead, the Visogoths rebelling and other barbarian tribes approaching, Valentinian I (the Western emperor) was pretty worked up. He died of a stroke, leaving control of the empire to his 16-year-old son, Gratian, who then appointed his army commander, Theodosius I, as the new eastern emperor, thus dividing the empire again.

 

Gratian was quickly killed by rebelling troops. His successors faired no better and were eventually defeated by Theodosius in 394, effectively putting the empire under one leader again--for now.

 

Theodosius ended up signing a peace treaty with the Visigoths, allowing them to settle within Roman territory, armed and under the direction of their own king (another costly mistake). Eventually, Theodosius's sons, Arcadius and Honorius, inherited the Eastern and Western empires, respectively (once again dividing the empire). During this period of change, in 395, the Visigoths seized the opportunity to rebel in Constantinople. They eventually settled in Greece and made several unsuccessful invasions of Italy.

 

The Fall of Rome

In 410 A.D., fed up after several years of unsuccessful negotiations with Honorius (the Western emperor), the Visigoths finally sacked Rome . They eventually left and were given a nearby kingdom of their own. However, Honorius and his successors had very little control and merely became figureheads, while the mostly assimilated Germanic commanders were left to rule the armies.

 

Also, there were five major things happening around this time that were also very relevant to the ultimate fall of Rome (which, although weakened, by this time had still existed, even after being sacked):

 

• As Rome had grown over the years, their people became more comfortable and civilized (i.e. fat and happy), which made them somewhat less interested in military concerns. They no longer had an "ax to grind."
• As taxes increased and the government grew more and more authoritative, they were less and less loyal and trusting of the government.
• Famine and plague began to take hold, reducing the population of Rome from over a million people to about 20,000, further disillusioning and weakening the resolve of the people.
• With less resolve and dedication, not enough Roman citizens were willing to become soldiers, so barbarian Germans (and eventually even the Huns) ended up becoming a regular part of the Roman army.
• Gallic and Germanic barbarian tribes had migrated from the North and East, with the Franks and Burgundians moving to France, the Alemanni moving to Germany (the French word for Germany is Allemagne), the Anglo-Saxons (made up of the Angles and the Saxons) moving to Britain (and changing the language from Latin to English) and the Vandals moving to Spain and North Africa. Rome itself became a melange of peoples.

 

The result of all this was that the Roman army, made up mostly of foreign soldiers, tended to be less disciplined and certainly less motivated (Napoleon Bonaparte would later share a similar fate, when foreign troops, comprising 2/3 of his army, deserted in droves during his failed Russian campaign in 1812).

 

Because of this, civil war and rebellion was once again rampant, and the western empire was under continuous attack. Ultimately, Visigoth mutineers ended up ousting what was to be the final emperor of Rome, Romulus Augustus (himself part barbarian). They did not acknowledge his position on the throne, as his father, who had taken it in a military coup, had given it to him. With this ousting, in 476, the Western empire (and therefore the Roman Empire) had officially ceased to be (the leader of the revolt, Odoacer, chose not to rule the Western empire, but rather to be the King of Italy, ruling from Ravenna, a nearby town).

 

This left the city of Rome abandoned and in ruins, eventually to be salvaged and run under Papal leadership. The Christian Church grew in power, and it was eventually the Bishops who were able to organize resistance to the barbarians and govern Rome. However, viewing the baths and technological breakthroughs as materialistic excess and an affront to God, these things were abolished. Roman technology would be gone for nearly 1,500 years, as oppression remained through the Dark and Middle Ages. Technology didn't really make a recovery until the 19th century.

 

Constantinople (now called Istanbul) stood for another thousand years after the fall of Rome as the capital of the great Byzantine Empire. It withstood numerous invasions by Islamic armies in the 7th century, and later by the Crusaders, but was left weakened by years of war. Eventually it was taken over by the Ottoman Turks in 1453.

 

To some, the Byzantine Empire preserved the last remnants of the Roman Empire, although they eventually reverted to the Greek language and gradually shed Roman customs. To others, the much later "Holy Roman Empire" represented the last ties to ancient Rome. However, it wasn't really Roman (nor, as one author pointed out, was it holy or even much of an empire), but rather was called this because of the kings who chose to be confirmed and crowned "emperor" by the pope.

 

This idea started with Charlemagne, but became officially referred to as "The Holy Roman Empire" beginning with Otto the Great in 962. It lasted for nearly a thousand years (mostly in Germany) until it was eventually abolished by Napoleon in 1806 when he established the Confederation of the Rhine (a league of German States) after defeating the Austrians at Austerlitz. This is somewhat ironic, since two years earlier Napoleon had planned to be crowned by the pope, but in the end chose to crown himself instead.

 

Up Next

Well, we have come full circle (of course, I'm alluding to the fact that my last series was set in the times of Napoleon, which is coincidentally where we have ended up). We have explored the principles of Rome  as well as its glorious rise, gradual decline and inevitable fall. In our next installment, we will apply the lessons from the decline and fall of the Roman Empire to modern day project management. If you have missed some of the installments (or have limited time and are unable to read through the details), not to worry, as our last installment will summarize all of the lessons we have learned in this series.

Jerry Manas, PMP, is an IT professional with more than 25 years of consulting and employment experience with a focus on project management, team building, training and PMO development. He has managed and consulted on projects of all sizes, from small development projects to large global initiatives, for both small and Fortune 500 organizations. He is currently writing a book, titled Napoleon on Project Management: Timeless Lessons in Planning, Execution, and Leadership (expanding on his Napoleon series published in gantthead).

Related Content

Lessons From the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire (Part 11)

by Jerry Manas, PMP August 6, 2003

Lessons From the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire (Part 12)

by Jerry Manas, PMP September 2, 2003

---

Comments (1)