Blogs and Wikis (and Bears...Oh My!)
So many meetings, so little time (to actually do anything).
I read somewhere that for every person added to a meeting, the length of it is increased by six minutes. While I have never performed this calculation, there is a kernel of truth to the concept that there is an inverse relationship to how effective a meeting can be once you overextend the membership and include non-essential participants.
Too many people or not, there are also times where varying degrees of misspoken or misunderstood details become part of the team conference experience. When clarification crosstalk occurs and three-quarters of the attendees sit and wait for a conclusion, yet another productive moment is lost. This doesn't even take into account situations where experts are AWOL from a gathering, and well-intentioned but uninformed parties attempt to fill the void--thus creating more confusion.
Then there are the team members who commit their resources then proceed to modify what they agreed to without informing or collaborating with teammates who might be affected. Project managers are invaluable at task and personnel monitoring, but additional pressure from peers (who also can be sympathetic and supportive) is a successful instrument of administration that can be exercised before managers are aware that project tasks have become at risk.
To help reduce wasted time, improve
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
ADVERTISEMENTS
|
"I might repeat to myself, slowly and soothingly, a list of quotations from beautiful minds profound; if I can remember any of the damn things." - Dorothy Parker |




