A Personal Approach to PM
As noted in previous articles, there is a lot of ideological conviction tied to the use of techniques such as “agile” and “Scrum”. If we’re going to be fair in the apportionment of indictments, there is a lot of ideological conviction associated with traditional techniques, as well as to standards that won’t necessarily get your project out of the front door.
And then, of course, there is reality. And the real world is where we need to be able to get stuff done. So, regardless of what the methodologies say you should do--and in spite of what the rhetoric says you should have in the way of executive support--there is the simple reality that you’re just a project manager trying desperately to get stuff done with the resources you have. (Or don’t have, as the case may be.)
Some of the comments on the aforementioned article resonate hugely in this regard:
- “I’m amazed at how quickly my organization was able to corrupt the Scrum framework we decided to push out in earnest approximately 1 year ago. We’re not staffed with a bunch of zealots, so we’re rolling with it and I think we’ll ultimately end up with a form of project management that works for us.”
- “I would like to have a team dedicated to my project, but I don’t. I would like to have a product owner who is
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
|
"Impartial observers from other planets would consider ours an utterly bizarre enclave if it were populated by birds, defined as flying animals, that nevertheless rarely or never actually flew. They would also be perplexed if they encountered in our seas, lakes, rivers and ponds, creatures defined as swimmers that never did any swimming. But they would be even more surprised to encounter a species defined as a thinking animal if, in fact, the creature very rarely indulged in actual thinking." - Steve Allen |




