The Best (and Worst) Study Approaches

PMI Southern Alberta Chapter

Mike Griffiths is a consultant and trainer who help organizations improve performance through shared leadership, agility and (un)common sense. He maintains the blog LeadingAnswers.com.

If you are studying for an upcoming certification by highlighting key text and re-reading important sections of textbooks, you are likely wasting your time. Despite being popular, these study techniques have been found to be the least effective approaches. So why not work smarter (not harder) and make better use of your study time? Spending a few minutes learning how we learn will make your study time more effective and rewarding.

The science of measuring the effectiveness of various learning techniques is large and complex. It has been researched for more than 125 years, and thousands of studies and journal reports are published every year in education and psychology journals. The biggest challenge for most people is extracting meaningful data and practical guidance from the constant fire-hose of complex academic papers. Fortunately, research from the Association for Psychological Science merged the predominant findings for 10 commonly used learning techniques and rated each from worst to best in terms of efficiency. The full report can be found here (and a Time magazine summary viewed here).

The worst (least effective) methods of study were found to be highlighting or underlining text. Multiple studies found these techniques to be a poor use of time when compared to other methods. That’s not to say highlighting or underlining does not help you learn things, …

Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading...

Log In
OR
Sign Up
ADVERTISEMENTS
ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors