Pragmatic Accountability
Many project teams experience an occasional lapse in accountability — important work falls through the cracks — and sometimes the problem becomes a crisis. But what exactly is ‘accountability’, and how do we improve it? Here’s a helpful model based on constancy of purpose, aligned actions and discrete outcomes.
A practical approach to implementing or improving accountability requires three things: 1) positive attitudes and motivations; 2) a good mental model of what accountability really is; and 3) hard evidence about how well our organization follows the model. There are plenty of articles on the first point, so I won’t cover that topic here. What most articles miss, however, are the next two points — the “how-to” side of improving accountability.
I will share a model of accountability that applies well to project teams, work groups and even the entire enterprise. Like a cake with three layers, this model covers high-level shared purpose, mid-level focus on quantifiable results, and low-level focus on daily tasks. As we explore all three layers, I will suggest specific questions you can ask to gather evidence needed to improve accountability in your team or organization. So let’s begin with our accountability model:

As you can see, the top layer “Constancy of Purpose” is the most general and permanent layer of this
Please log in or sign up below to read the rest of the article.
|
"To generalize is to be an idiot." - William Blake |




