Project Management

Feedback on Book Review

From the Program Management and Leadership Blog
by
This blog discusses the top what is an effective program manager and leader. This blog also discusses a combination of brain science, neurology, psychology and management to identify the elements of leaders and increasing their effectiveness.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Leadership Unleashed

Leading Teams on the Edge

Leadership Skills of Winston Churchill

Book Review of Start with Why, How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone To Take Action by Simon Sinek

Life's Principles by Ray Danielo

Categories

Leadership and Management, Leadership and Program Manager Styles and Success Types, Neuroscience of Leadership, Time Management for the Project or Program Manager

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


 

A recent phenomenon in project management is for some to try to use neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology to identify the skills and capabilities that make one a strong project manager or leader in an organization and to coach others how to make better decisions or empower those around them.  I had read this book, Neuroscience for Leadership, Harnessing the Brain Gain Advantage, which was written by 3 subject-matter experts in Neuroscience. Dr. Tara Swart who designed the Neuroscience Leadership program at MIT, Kitty Chisholm coaches in leadership development, and Dr. Paul Brown is a clinical and organizational psychologist at Monarch Business School in Switzerland. The  theory or practice of neuroscience is that if we can understand how the brain works, its behaviors, beliefs and attitudes and how one obtain beliefs and how does one develop a positive attitude or a feeling of ownership of a task, then one can develop signposts or markers to give direction to people to understand how leadership works. If one can understand how leadership works, then the thinking goes, leadership can be taught like learning how to ride a bicycle as a youngster, and can be fine-tuned in one’s career. This transcends one’s career, man or woman, project manager or not. There is a basket of skills that one can train his or her mind to develop to succeed as a manager of people.

The authors propose the proposition that leadership is not inherited. One is not born a leader. It is taught. This is the continuing struggle, ying-yang, discussion of what are the qualities of a good leader, and whether in these days where we are getting ready for the 2016 presidential election, whether one can read a book and become a true leader, or develop them based on circumstances, or by virtue of his or her birth and upbringing. This is not answered in the book.

The book is quite a memorable read given the layer of neuroscience background that they try to bring the reader up to the layer of understanding in order to explain what the qualities of a good leader are. That said, the book reiterates in memorable fashion the attributes of a good leader: strong character, plausible reason for event, explicit goals for actions, emotional language, consistency and a clear and consistent vision of the future, and an ability for storytelling. Most project and program managers, child psychologies and parents agree that goals or objectives can help direct and guide a person to succeed. The writers mention that the “human brain is geared towards enabling goal driven actions.”  A good leader is motivated to succeed.

The writers also mention that trust (and the inherent chemical in the brain, oxytocin) is a good component of a successful relationship whether in business or one’s personal life. Leaders who are charismatic but is ineffective is unlikely to remain influential. However, one who is interested in his others is perceived as charismatic. They do mention that as the brain is action and objective driven that solving a hard problem or accomplishing a difficult goals creates the synergy and conditions for brainstorming and new ideas. Those activity feeds on itself. They mention that in some cases, it is stress and negative conditions that in some cases motivate some, but generally it is the leader who can use self-management to better control stress and adversity. I do not agree that one can reprogram one’s brain connections and change them significantly to help a youngster or adult better meet stress or issues in one’s life. It should be one’s belief in oneself, values and grounding that will support system which will help a leader or other individual success and meet stress. Some have said it is a “fight or flight” mentality when trying to conquer one’s foibles, inadequacies or stressful situations. The writes mention that the brain uses past experiences to “predict” or condition the person to make assumptions or realize the next steps or how to avoid discomfort.

  • The writers also refer to the qualities of good communication skills which help a leader succeed. They mention  that it is the leader who can control his or her emotion, or convey that emotion to the audience which what can motivate a follower. It is the intellectual understanding of one’s background. These skills are not taught in university. It is the inspirational speaker who can: present “precise and metaphorical language, appreciate visual imagery, explicit goals for action, emotional language, consistent, and a clear vision of the future.”  These are the motivations that can be used to motivate employees to “ a call to arms” to succeed. These elements are on the plus side of the ledger,  but on the challenge side of the ledger which the authors do not mention are elements which may detract from success, unless the leader can address them. These are, to name a few:
  • matrix management,
  • the politics of the environment and project and circumstances,
  • degree of collaboration between the employees, departments and stakeholders,
  • employee challenges,
  •  enterprise-wide challenges such as staffing, inconsistent stakeholder or sponsor support, budgeting and,
  • other obstacles to success.

I am sure that the reader can name several others.

The authors start the book discussing the chemistry of the brain and the chemicals or enzymes in the brain which affect behavior. For example, adrenalin is an endocrine which sends messages around the body, telling the body what to do. It can be a motivator or de-motivator. Adrenalin is one of many neurotransmitters around the body which stimulates the heart to beat, lungs to breather and stomach to digest, and also to emotionally react to situations. They refer to the neuriobiology as a mechanism to make the enhance one’s leadership, such as it can affect whether the leader is seen as authentic. The authors discuss neuroscience how the body works so a leader can better understand how to think more clearly or speak clearly or identify the impediments in affecting his or her success. So, from that point of view, the background presented by the authors is successful. Because of the concepts presented, this book cannot be read in one sitting. However, it teaches the reader to be more cognizant and self-aware of his or her surroundings, environment, and body. That is, their reactions, their emotional intelligence. The authors do not go to the extreme and mention that the leader should his or her neurotransmitters such as increase the adrenalin or dopamine when presenting to stakeholders. On the contrary, it is that the leader should be aware in order to increase his or her effectiveness.

Overall, I would recommend this book since it can help increase the efficiency of their brain and emotions. I have not worked with a program manager or project leader yet who used their neuroscience to harness the energies of their employees to drive a project or endeavor towards success. But it will make me more cognizant of the chemistry at play.

 

 

 

 


Posted on: December 05, 2015 02:53 PM | Permalink

Comments (3)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
David Schlatter Sr Systems Analyst| RGA Batavia, NY, United States
Nicely done! For a book that "heavy", you did a great job of providing a summary and "feel" for the material. Maybe we need to add "Neuroscience" to all the project checklists floating around ...

avatar
Larry Marks Nj, United States
You are right. The authors mention that stakeholders are looking for emotional intelligent and intellectual intelligent leaders and describe the qualitative characteritics of a leader. I agree. They describe what makes a good leader, but this is a benchmark that we can improve on.

avatar
David Schlatter Sr Systems Analyst| RGA Batavia, NY, United States
mmmmm ..... a benchmark for PMs, be it Portfolio, Program or Project ... what attributes and measures would you suggest? Do you think using such a benchmark minimize the risk involved of engaging new PMs?

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform."

- Mark Twain

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors