Disengagement and Low Unemployment - A Toxic Combination
From the Eye on the Workforce Blog
by Joe Wynne
Workforce management is a key part of project success, but project managers often find it difficult to get trustworthy information on what really works. From interpersonal interactions to big workforce issues we'll look the latest research and proven techniques to find the most effective solutions for your projects.
Recent Posts
Help Your Team Succeed as AI Reshapes Delivery
Show an Explorer's Courage in Today's Work Environment
Facilitating Team When Given New Tight Budget Part 2
Facilitating Team When Given New Tight Budget
Your RTO Employer Missed It But You Can Fix It
Categories
Artificial Intelligence,
Benefits Realization,
Career Development,
Change Management,
Communications Management,
Complexity,
Decision Making,
Employee Engagement,
HR Mgmt,
Innovation,
Leadership,
Learning,
Manage People,
Organizational Culture,
Performance Improvement,
Recruiting,
Risk Management,
Robotic Process Automation,
Schedule Management,
Stakeholder Management,
Teams,
Worker Selection
Date
As a country, Germany is doing well economically, but there is a problem in the workforce. A large number of employees in Germany are "disengaged" at work. That means that these employees are not involved in, enthusiastic about or committed to their work, coworkers and workplace. They do not give 100% and may even undermine productivity.
Sounds unfortunate for the disengaged workers, but is there something you can learn from this situation?
As a matter of fact, there is. An economy can be humming along, yet that does not mean that in an organization - your organization - workers are satisfied and engaged. Workers can be suffering from disengagement with its negative consequences on your project. There just seems to be no correlation that suggests peaks in economic measures means happy days in your project. I would caution even that low unemployment may make your life as a project manager worse when workers are disengaged.
Look at Germany for instance. According to Gallup, the annual absenteeism rate in Germany is "67% higher among actively disengaged employees compared with engaged workers." Think about your projects and how absenteeism will slow down work and add to costs.
Even worse, disengaged workers are more likely to be looking for another job. That will create a new problem. The article mentions something that has been covered previously on the Eye on the Workforce blog: studies have shown that costs related to replacing an employee can be as high as 1.5 times the employee's annual salary. In Germany, according to the Bundesagentur für Arbeit (Germany's federal job agency) it took 84 days to fill a vacancy with a qualified employee in 2015, on average. That's 19 more days than it took to fill a vacancy in 2008. You might have already experienced difficulty finding new workers or replacements those who have left.
And here is the factor that multiplies your problem: Disengaged workers are more likely to leave. Gallup found in Germany for example that 87% of engaged employees strongly agreed that they planned to be with their current company three years from now. For actively disengaged workers only 21% strongly agreed that they planned to be with their current company three years from now. More likely to leave - and to leave you in the lurch. Low unemployment can make it even more difficult for you to maintain the productive resources you need in your project.
Employee engagement does not have to do with economics as much as it has to do with management policies. (There are many other articles and posts on employee engagement by me on this site.) If workers are disengaged at your workplace, be prepared for low morale and a schedule will that has to adapt to absenteeism and extended periods of replacing workers.
How has employee disengagement - and perhaps low unemployment - affected your project?
Posted on: May 03, 2016 07:30 AM |
Permalink
Comments (5)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
An interesting article. Makes one wonder how much stronger Germany´s economy would be, and how much productivity would increase, if workers were more engaged. Will also be interesting to see how German employers engage skilled workers among the Syrian and other Middle Eastern refugees.
I have found that employee disengagement also often results in lowering team morale.
Vincent Guerard
Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance
Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Low engagement has many side impact on project and corporation. I think that disengagement of ressource come from the way project or corporation are lead.
But who is responsible tho get engagement from worker?
Often top manager are more preoccupied with there carreer than anything! When that is the case they forget that it is their responsibility to build the team.
Thanks Joe nice blog
Von Brickhouse
Retired Military (LTC)| Northrop Grumman
Harker Heights, Tx, United States
Joe
Thanks for the article.
Good stuff, Joe! Spot on that engagement is directly affected by management policies. I know from personal experience as well as having heard if from various sources that people do not leave companies/organizations...they leave managers. I've had the good fortune to have managers that help keep me engaged for over a decade now and it makes all the difference in the world. I would venture to say that, when problems occur on projects, a very high percentage of those can be attributed to disengagement in one way or another...a higher percentage than we probably realize.
Karthik T
Senior Engineering Manager| Nike
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"I never thought much of the courage of a lion-tamer. Inside the cage he is at least safe from people."
- George Bernard Shaw
|