Project Management

Your Organization Is Not Using the Best Promotion Strategy

From the Eye on the Workforce Blog
by
Workforce management is a key part of project success, but project managers often find it difficult to get trustworthy information on what really works. From interpersonal interactions to big workforce issues we'll look the latest research and proven techniques to find the most effective solutions for your projects.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Help Your Team Succeed as AI Reshapes Delivery

Show an Explorer's Courage in Today's Work Environment

Facilitating Team When Given New Tight Budget Part 2

Facilitating Team When Given New Tight Budget

Your RTO Employer Missed It But You Can Fix It

Categories

Artificial Intelligence, Benefits Realization, Career Development, Change Management, Communications Management, Complexity, Decision Making, Employee Engagement, HR Mgmt, Innovation, Leadership, Learning, Manage People, Organizational Culture, Performance Improvement, Recruiting, Risk Management, Robotic Process Automation, Schedule Management, Stakeholder Management, Teams, Worker Selection

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: HR Mgmt, Leadership


There have been a couple of posts I made recently that drew comments on opposite sides of the debate  on whether bad managers persist or whether they are more typically eliminated as soon as their inadequate competence is made manifest.

 

Recently we have received more clarification in this area. But first, which of the following do you think is the most effective strategy organizations can take to ensure business efficiency?

a.  Promote based on merit (as defined by best competence in the previous position)

b.  Promote individuals chosen randomly from the workforce

c.  Promote alternately the best and the worst individuals in terms of competence

 

I would not have been able to ask such a ridiculous question if Italian researchers had not tested for these  very alternatives in a sophisticated workplace simulation. Their simulation promoted individuals based on the three strategies listed above, but in each case competency in the new level was not dependent on the competency in the previous level. (You can debate how much like real organizations this last criteria is.)

 

Without this study, I would also not have been able to describe the startling results. Ponder the following:

  • Promotion based on merit reduced global organizational efficiency in the simulation.
  • To avoid the reduction of global efficiency, the simulated organization had to promote based on the rules  in (b) and (c) - the random rules.

The results were at once surprising, then seemed to explain so much. Often, individuals are promoted into positions for which they are not ready (and may never be ready), predominantly based on performance in their previous position, even though the skills needed in the new position are much different. 

 

For the time being, you will simply have to be prepared for functional managers who are dysfunctional and leaders who cannot lead. Project management skills can help you survive in such an environment.  Maybe someday, though, we will hear in our workplaces the announcement that will tell us things may get better:

You over there! You win the workplace lottery! You're manager now. Move your stuff into that office.


Posted on: October 08, 2010 07:26 AM | Permalink

Comments (1)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Julie Goff Brisbane, Q, Australia
Interesting article, but I have found that internal promotion is getting rarer with organisations advertising jobs externally regardless of the quality of any internal candidates. What this means is that invariably the internal candidate loses out because they cannot compete with an external candidate who already has experience at that level. It then becomes a real catch 22.

The other side of this question is why would you promote someone to a new position and then not provide support, mentoring and training to bring them up to speed. No wonder companies are inefficient if they employ this "barefoot" approach to increasing employees competencies in their new role.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

A verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's written on.

- Sam Goldwyn

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors