Project Management

How To Judge Risk Taking Preferences

From the Eye on the Workforce Blog
by
Workforce management is a key part of project success, but project managers often find it difficult to get trustworthy information on what really works. From interpersonal interactions to big workforce issues we'll look the latest research and proven techniques to find the most effective solutions for your projects.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Help Your Team Succeed as AI Reshapes Delivery

Show an Explorer's Courage in Today's Work Environment

Facilitating Team When Given New Tight Budget Part 2

Facilitating Team When Given New Tight Budget

Your RTO Employer Missed It But You Can Fix It

Categories

Artificial Intelligence, Benefits Realization, Career Development, Change Management, Communications Management, Complexity, Decision Making, Employee Engagement, HR Mgmt, Innovation, Leadership, Learning, Manage People, Organizational Culture, Performance Improvement, Recruiting, Risk Management, Robotic Process Automation, Schedule Management, Stakeholder Management, Teams, Worker Selection

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: Worker Selection


An ever-present problem for you as a project manager is being able to "read" candidates so that you can match  the right person to the available position(s). Some people are better at this naturally than others, but this difficult skill can be acquired over time. For example, consider yourself in the following situation.

You have just selected from a large pool two candidates who pass the knowledge requirements for a team leader position. This positioni s going to require  someone who is willing to take risks to  get the work done as necessary. Led by this leader, the team of analysts is going to have to get results without a well-defined process and little time to plan before starting work. Stakeholders will have to approve the team's approach and methods on the fly. If the team does not get results, your project is doomed early.
 

Qualified Candidate 1 

A mild-mannered woman - a former analyst for 5 years - who has led teams of mild-mannered analysts for about 5 years. During the casual conversation in the interview you learned that she is prudent with her personal spending .

Qualified Candidate 2

An enthusiastic project worker with leadership potential. He has been a successful analyst for over 10 years, although he has never led a team. The person who recommended him mentioned that he is on a competitive parachute  formation team.

Think about this for a couple of days and look for the next post with a full explanation.


Posted on: August 08, 2011 10:13 AM | Permalink

Comments (0)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item


Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS
ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors