Project Management

Risk Managers’ Customer Relations “Management”

From the Game Theory in Management Blog
by
Modelling Business Decisions and their Consequences

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

George Jetson, Bring Me A Rock!

How To Obstruct A PMO

Rage, Rage Against The Dying Of The Project

Think You Have A Culture Problem? Think Again.

Finally! A GAAP Concept PMs Can Get Behind!

Categories

Game Theory, PMO, Politics, Risk Management, Strategic Management

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


As many of my regular readers know, I hold much of what passes for modern risk management to be transparently fraudulent, little more than institutional worrying tripped out in Gaussian curve jargon. But it seems that whenever anybody starts writing about the management sciences, everything suddenly becomes anodyne, as if it’s in bad taste at best, rabidly antagonistic at worst, to actually challenge bad theory openly. I don’t get that (aha! sayest the risk managers… Hatfield’s too stupid to understand our concepts!).

But March’s theme is customer relations management, so I’d thought I’d combine the two subjects to analyze – well, how does the peddler of fraudulent management science manage his customers? Is it not through deceit? Certainly, but that implies that the multi-billion dollar risk management industry is built on a foundation of sand, and that at some point in the future no amount of customer relations “management” will suffice to keep the façade up and functioning.

Soooo…. how does the risk manager manage his customers, knowing (if he’s smart and intellectually honest) that his epistemological bubble is bound to eventually burst?  Well, it’s been my experience that their favorite tactic is to assert that, should any manager eschew performing risk analysis, that they are ipso facto either failing to do due diligence in their managing of the project, or else too, ahem, ignorant to understand the vital importance of doing risk management. However, to the PM savvy enough to not be bamboozled into spending tens of thousands (at least) to avoid being so tagged, a few questions might, just might, be in order, such as:

1.      Can your analysis accurately predict future events?

2.      If so, why aren’t you already incredibly rich?

3.      If not, why should I pay you tens of thousands of dollars for your analysis?

4.      If, as much of your literature claims, risk management must be performed throughout the life of the project, can you show me the output from the information stream that your analysis provides – on an ongoing basis – that actually helps me manage this project?

If the risk management fellow performing the pitch for his company’s work is honest, the answer to question #1 is “no.” If he isn’t, then question #2 should probably snare him.

Question #3 is where we start to get to the root of the matter. The typical risk management “analysis” involves interviews with you and your principals, answering questions such as “what might go wrong?” “what are the odds of that happening?,” and “what would the cost impact be?” However, if you and your principals are aware of the things that might go wrong on your project, what possible information advantage can be attained by guessing (cross through) estimating the odds of occurrence? Don’t your principals already know what might happen? Isn’t that why experienced managers are preferable to inexperienced ones?

Taking question #3 further, let’s say that one of your project leaders tells the RM-type that there’s a 10% chance of something happening that costs the project $10,000. If the event eventually happens, does the estimate reduce the impact? If it does not happen, didn’t you just waste the amount of time and money it took to document that there was a 10% chance of it happening?

The final nail in the risk managers’ epistemological coffin is the answer to question #4. No, there isn’t a report that can be provided on an ongoing basis, derived from continued use of risk analysis techniques, that helps manage projects. It simply doesn’t exist. If it did, it would be as ubiquitous as the Cost Performance Report (format 1), or the Gantt Chart, provably legitimate outputs from valid PM analyses. Alas, if an unforeseen event hits your project, then the risk analysis will have classified it as an “unknown unknown.” If the event was foreseen, then the risk analyst can say “I told you so,” without any further assistance to your new circumstances. And, finally, if the event didn’t happen, then the waste of time worrying about it possibly having happened becomes all the more blatant.

Ultimately, my advice to risk managers on the best way to “manage” your customer relations is this: don’t let your clients think through the overall risk management process, ‘cuz if they do, they won’t be your customers much longer.


Posted on: March 23, 2014 09:01 PM | Permalink

Comments (2)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Andy C
MH,

clearly you think risk analysis is bunkham, fraudulent no less. However you fail to offer an alternative, one can only presume that in the absence of a comprehensive and well constructed risk analysis we are to bury our heads in the sand. Risk encompasses uncertainties, yes sometimes we don't know what we don't know, but using experience and examining probablity we are able to reduce the ambiguity of even the most complex projects. I respectfully suggest that your four questions are naiive, bordering on the obtuse.
Risk comes in at all levels, it is therefore essential to determine which uncertainty matters, by prioritising it will eliminate risk with least impact/probability, so yer 10% "chance" (by which I believe you mean "risk"), may score lower on the priority list. However, the estimate will not reduce impact, if the event happens the impact could be just as severe, but being prepared should reduce (mitigate) the probability of it happening, which is why the analysis is conducted in the first place.
Unfortunately there are charlatans, but don't confuse them with professionals that take the practice of risk management very seriously, and in a properly managed environment can save far more than the money spent conducting the exercise in the first place.

avatar
Ayman Safeeldein Alwakrra, Wa, Qatar
thanks
dear
Any member of the project team can be a risk owner
At the beginning of the project, risks are identified through brainstorming and meetings

Any member of the project team can be a risk owner
At the beginning of the project, risks are identified through brainstorming and meetings
If we assume that you have started a new project and that the project team members have not worked in such projects before, will they be able to identify the risks they face during the project? No, never, they will not be able to. Therefore, the importance of the risk manager lies with us, and it does not have to be from outside the organization, it can be from within, and I think that the project manager can be as well.

It is true that we cannot identify all risks, nor can we avoid them, but we can identify a large number of risks and thus know how to mitigate them.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"The man who views the world at 50 the same as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life."

- Muhammad Ali

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors