Valerie Denney Associate Professor| Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- WorldwideCleveland, Sc, United States
Trust is a critical element of a constructive environment on a project. Without it, individuals likely will not maximize their contribution to the team. What traits/behaviors of the leader can generate trust among the team and encourage project process and advancement?
What are the ethical elements of supporting a trusting environment? What should a leader do and why?
Let's focus on the positive instead of what hasn't worked. Share your experiences. Let's talk about it. Saving Changes...
Cheikh FAYE Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Expert, CEO and owner| Eurêka TechnologiesDakar, Senegal
Hi Valerie, for me it's quite simple, it's not so far to search than that, it requires only to adhere to the PMI Code of ethics and professional conduct.
Thank you so much for sharing.
...
1 reply by Valerie Denney
Feb 13, 2019 10:03 AM
Valerie Denney
...
Greetings Cheikh,
You are one the first on this discussion to mention the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Thank you for bringing it up. Certainly the code provides an excellent framework for trust (among many other elements), but the term "trust" does not have a universal definition.
Saving Changes...
Valerie Denney Associate Professor| Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- WorldwideCleveland, Sc, United States
Feb 13, 2019 7:40 AM
Replying to Cheikh FAYE
...
Hi Valerie, for me it's quite simple, it's not so far to search than that, it requires only to adhere to the PMI Code of ethics and professional conduct.
Thank you so much for sharing.
Greetings Cheikh,
You are one the first on this discussion to mention the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Thank you for bringing it up. Certainly the code provides an excellent framework for trust (among many other elements), but the term "trust" does not have a universal definition.
...
1 reply by Cheikh FAYE
Feb 14, 2019 5:48 AM
Cheikh FAYE
...
Indeed Valerie, but the point of view of the PMI counts and makes more sense than any other point of view. Thank you so much again for the clarification.
Saving Changes...
Jason ChowManager (End Users Support Services)| The Hong Kong Jockey ClubNew Territory, Hong Kong
Feb 07, 2019 11:16 PM
Replying to Jason Chow
...
This is a very good discussion. Trust can be a personal decision. Based on background/experience, some people can build trust in shorter period, and some may take long. As a team leader, building a secure environment for team members to trust each other is not an easy task. Given the nature of project is temporary, sometimes leaders have not enough time to build the trust before the team has to catch up the schedule. Making use of team building opportunities can help to build the trust environment.
A two way trust should have the highest work efficiency and best output quality. One way trust should work as well, but the communication may not be as efficient and not really sustainable.
...
2 replies by Jason Chow and Valerie Denney
Feb 13, 2019 10:52 AM
Valerie Denney
...
I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on how a one way trust can work. I have always believed that it needed to be bilateral.
Feb 15, 2019 11:26 AM
Jason Chow
...
In building a trust relationship, it is hardly to be absolutely one sided. When two parties working for one task, It is about the level of trust, it changes over time as well. The communication efficiency would be highest if both parties are having a trusted relationship. However, if trust only happen on one side, the relationship would still work, but it may not be efficient, and takes time to build the trust. That is what ethics and integrity comes into play. A person with ethical behaviour and high integrity can build up his credit for trust. A life example is the cooperation with a new vendor in a company. When the vendor first came into office, the members in the office would not have a lot of trust to the vendor staff. The vendor staff still have to do the work with the company, but may be asked a lot of questions or bring up a lot of queries to their work, not believing they can deliver quality result. After a period of time when the vendor colleague shows their sincerity and integrity in their work, it built the trust. The level of trust will become higher when more of these things happened.
Saving Changes...
Valerie Denney Associate Professor| Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- WorldwideCleveland, Sc, United States
Feb 13, 2019 10:45 AM
Replying to Jason Chow
...
A two way trust should have the highest work efficiency and best output quality. One way trust should work as well, but the communication may not be as efficient and not really sustainable.
I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on how a one way trust can work. I have always believed that it needed to be bilateral. Saving Changes...
Cheikh FAYE Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Expert, CEO and owner| Eurêka TechnologiesDakar, Senegal
Feb 13, 2019 10:03 AM
Replying to Valerie Denney
...
Greetings Cheikh,
You are one the first on this discussion to mention the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Thank you for bringing it up. Certainly the code provides an excellent framework for trust (among many other elements), but the term "trust" does not have a universal definition.
Indeed Valerie, but the point of view of the PMI counts and makes more sense than any other point of view. Thank you so much again for the clarification.
...
1 reply by Valerie Denney
Feb 15, 2019 7:22 PM
Valerie Denney
...
Good point!
Saving Changes...
Jason ChowManager (End Users Support Services)| The Hong Kong Jockey ClubNew Territory, Hong Kong
Feb 13, 2019 10:45 AM
Replying to Jason Chow
...
A two way trust should have the highest work efficiency and best output quality. One way trust should work as well, but the communication may not be as efficient and not really sustainable.
In building a trust relationship, it is hardly to be absolutely one sided. When two parties working for one task, It is about the level of trust, it changes over time as well. The communication efficiency would be highest if both parties are having a trusted relationship. However, if trust only happen on one side, the relationship would still work, but it may not be efficient, and takes time to build the trust. That is what ethics and integrity comes into play. A person with ethical behaviour and high integrity can build up his credit for trust. A life example is the cooperation with a new vendor in a company. When the vendor first came into office, the members in the office would not have a lot of trust to the vendor staff. The vendor staff still have to do the work with the company, but may be asked a lot of questions or bring up a lot of queries to their work, not believing they can deliver quality result. After a period of time when the vendor colleague shows their sincerity and integrity in their work, it built the trust. The level of trust will become higher when more of these things happened.
...
1 reply by Valerie Denney
Feb 15, 2019 12:14 PM
Valerie Denney
...
Jason,
This is a fabulous reply! I particularly like the concept of building "credit for trust". Maybe this is sort of like a bank account that can be used later.
Valerie
Saving Changes...
Valerie Denney Associate Professor| Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- WorldwideCleveland, Sc, United States
Feb 15, 2019 11:26 AM
Replying to Jason Chow
...
In building a trust relationship, it is hardly to be absolutely one sided. When two parties working for one task, It is about the level of trust, it changes over time as well. The communication efficiency would be highest if both parties are having a trusted relationship. However, if trust only happen on one side, the relationship would still work, but it may not be efficient, and takes time to build the trust. That is what ethics and integrity comes into play. A person with ethical behaviour and high integrity can build up his credit for trust. A life example is the cooperation with a new vendor in a company. When the vendor first came into office, the members in the office would not have a lot of trust to the vendor staff. The vendor staff still have to do the work with the company, but may be asked a lot of questions or bring up a lot of queries to their work, not believing they can deliver quality result. After a period of time when the vendor colleague shows their sincerity and integrity in their work, it built the trust. The level of trust will become higher when more of these things happened.
Jason,
This is a fabulous reply! I particularly like the concept of building "credit for trust". Maybe this is sort of like a bank account that can be used later.
Valerie Saving Changes...
Valerie Denney Associate Professor| Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- WorldwideCleveland, Sc, United States
Feb 14, 2019 5:48 AM
Replying to Cheikh FAYE
...
Indeed Valerie, but the point of view of the PMI counts and makes more sense than any other point of view. Thank you so much again for the clarification.
Good point! Saving Changes...
Karthik RamamurthyAuthor, Say YES to Project Success| Founder KeyResultzChennai, Tamilnadu, Tamilnadu, India
Hi Valerie! Thanks for the excellent question which is very relevant to PMs.
Project teams involve people from various disciplines who have to quickly gel together and work towards achieving common goals.
Teams with high levels of mutual trust are certainly more likely to be more productive and thus achieve higher levels of success.
As part of our PMI Leadership Institute Master Class (LIMC), we read and discussed Patrick Lencioni's "The Five Dysfunctions of a Team", a leadership fable which emphasized the critical importance of trust in team success.
Another great read on the topic is Stephen Covey's "The Speed of Trust."
In my experience, an important step is to develop an environment of open communication and respect for divergent views. Since trust begets trust, PMs need to act in a manner which shows that they truly trust their team members.
Reacting to bad news in a mature and balanced manner is also key since negative overreactions will deter team members from communicating issues.
Another practical way to build trust is to signal actions, communicate about progress, and deliver on promises. Done in a repeatable manner, one can significantly strengthen trust levels.
...
1 reply by Valerie Denney
Feb 18, 2019 10:46 AM
Valerie Denney
...
Karthik,
Thank you for the wonderful reply and thank you for including some additional reading sources on the topic. I'm familiar with both and agree that these are good sources for additional information.
Oh how many times have I seen a leader react to bad news poorly? I too have witnesses those negative overreactions and the impact on the team.
Saving Changes...
Valerie Denney Associate Professor| Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- WorldwideCleveland, Sc, United States
Feb 17, 2019 11:02 AM
Replying to Karthik Ramamurthy
...
Hi Valerie! Thanks for the excellent question which is very relevant to PMs.
Project teams involve people from various disciplines who have to quickly gel together and work towards achieving common goals.
Teams with high levels of mutual trust are certainly more likely to be more productive and thus achieve higher levels of success.
As part of our PMI Leadership Institute Master Class (LIMC), we read and discussed Patrick Lencioni's "The Five Dysfunctions of a Team", a leadership fable which emphasized the critical importance of trust in team success.
Another great read on the topic is Stephen Covey's "The Speed of Trust."
In my experience, an important step is to develop an environment of open communication and respect for divergent views. Since trust begets trust, PMs need to act in a manner which shows that they truly trust their team members.
Reacting to bad news in a mature and balanced manner is also key since negative overreactions will deter team members from communicating issues.
Another practical way to build trust is to signal actions, communicate about progress, and deliver on promises. Done in a repeatable manner, one can significantly strengthen trust levels.
Karthik,
Thank you for the wonderful reply and thank you for including some additional reading sources on the topic. I'm familiar with both and agree that these are good sources for additional information.
Oh how many times have I seen a leader react to bad news poorly? I too have witnesses those negative overreactions and the impact on the team. Saving Changes...