Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

When should the Project Manager be appointed?

linkedin twitter facebook   Government   Integration Management   Requirements Management  
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
In your opinion, the project manager should be appointed:
- Before project planning begins
- Before drafting the Project Charter
- When preparing the business analysis
- Other moments
Sort By:
avatar
Thomas Walenta Global Project Economy Expert Hackenheim, Germany
My experience:

Appointment as PM definitively before planning starts and officially with signing of the charter. It is good to participate in charter development, but you are not appointed PM then.

Business analysis can speed up your understanding of the project but also narrow your independent view on the charter (unwritten assumptions).
Never ever participate in contract negotiations.
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
As early as possible. The more of a foundation the PM can have on the project the better they can help steer the ship.
avatar
Alexandre Costa Scrum Master| Integer Consulting - Pictet technologies Loures, Portugal
I agree with @Andrew the sooner the project manager becomes aware of the project, the more he will be able to prepare for it and gain a deeper understanding of it.
avatar
Lily Murariu Research Council Officer Program Advisor| National Research Council Canada Cantley, Quebec, Canada
As early as possible would be very beneficial. This will be aligned according to the organizational structure of the organization and the availability of the project management workforce.
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
There is a best practice that has been stated long time ago: somebody that has knolwedge about project management must be engaged from the time where the idea came, no matter this person will be the assigned project manager to the project just in case the project is approved. If you review PRINCE2 you will find it inside the process life cycle. In other cases that is the mix between business analysis and project management disciplines. You will find the recomendation I stated above just in case you review the IIBA or the PMI related standards.
avatar
George Freeman Thought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
I agree with Sergio and the rest, and have personally found the best practice to be one of the following:

- [1] Mandate -- Project Sponsor -- Project Manager
- [2] Mandate -- Project Manager -- Project Sponsor

Either of these options happens basically in the same time-frame and provides the best opportunity for PM empowerment and project success (in all respects). However, as long as the PM is involved in the formulation of the charter, the full value proposition of the PM can be realized regardless of when he/she is assigned.
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
I agree with my fellow colleagues and specifically, Andrew’s statement.
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
I joined my current project as the busines case was being written. It was good to be part of that effort.
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Like previous posts "as early as possible". In the case of an external bid, it would be in that process the best time for the PM to be determined.

In an internal project, the case of Stephane is also an excellent timing.
avatar
Muhammad Ali Project Manager| Al-Toukhi for Contracting, Trading & Industry Hail, Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia
Project Manager should be appointed & authorized while drafting Project Charter.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS
ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors