Andrew SoswaTechnology leader| Leading global financial institutionElk Grove Village, Il, United States
Is there anyone concerned that completely rewriting PMP to include predictive, adaptive, and hybrid methods (which I think is a great idea) - will decrease value (or completely remove need for) PMI-ACP - AND - give rise to CSM while confusing HR and hiring managers on the value of PMP certification? Saving Changes...
Wade HarshmanScrum Master| GDITIndianapolis, In, United States
Sep 17, 2019 6:28 PM
Replying to David Maynard
...
Hi Andrew, thank you for your comment.
This issue caused some quite a bit strain in the class. There were software developers that were pursuing their PMP and a group of (very nice folks) that had worked all of their career building forklifts to exacting specifications. So, half the class could easily understand agile methods, but the other half simply couldn't see how you could design / test / deliver a production product that way. It really lengthened the class and (much to the dismay of the university) I elected to hold some Saturday sessions to try to get everyone on the same level of understanding.
The bottom line is that (if I were honest and didn't hold class off-campus) the course would have taken about 3 or 4 weeks longer than it did with version 5.
Clearly this is the direction we, PMI and the body of practitioners have chosen to go in. It just REALLY makes a Project Management class harder to teach with a mixed group of students. Some students were very confused --- the software folks with the waterfall talk and the forklift folks with agile approaches. AND! They really can't be split up since both are important for the exam.
David, I think you raise valid concerns.
Ideally, it'd be nice to think that someone who holds the PMP understands the difference between predictive and adaptive life cycles. Frankly, we know this is not the case. PMI has dominated project management in predictive life cycles, but did a poor job with adaptive life cycles and has been struggling to catch up. Even if it's necessary, it almost seems unfair to suddenly expect new project managers to have some base competency in adaptive life cycles when so many experienced PMP holders have no similar experience.
I'm not offering solutions, I simply agree that you've found a difficulty that should be addressed. The PMP is so highly regarded that we need to be cautious about changing it. I hope someone at PMI finds a good solution to this. Saving Changes...
James ShieldsIS Director - Portfolio Solutions| City and County of San Francisco, SFPDSan Francisco, Ca, United States
Andrew -- thanks for the comment. I did take a look at it and what stands out is:
"About half of the examination will represent predictive project management approaches and the other half will represent agile or hybrid approaches." Perhaps Wysocki's 8th edition of Effective Project Management will be another book for PMP prep time, which covers TPM, APM and HPM.
But, I'm not following you on "... and their stance against CSM and others.". I view Scrum as a specific methodology under the umbrella of Agile (APM). PMI is not advocating or disavowing any particular approach to Agile's values and principles to my knowledge. Do you have information to the contrary?
On the PMP vs. ACP: I guess we will have to see how this plays out over the next couple of years. It would be helpful if PMI provided some clarity on certification roadmaps in the not-too-distant future.
...
1 reply by Andrew Soswa
Sep 18, 2019 5:49 PM
Andrew Soswa
...
Thank you James.
I don't have any 'insider information' - I try to simply note the fact. In my opinion, there is a huge delta between what HR & recruiters perceive the CSM certification to be -- and what is the reality of this certification ($1,200 cost, 2-or-3 days training, 30 questions open book, no need for any Agile or project management experience).
The HR/recruiters value CSM as it was gold Agile standard - in all Agile methodologies, including the hybrid waterfall/Agile.
There is no way that it can be unscrewed - and the PMP going into the truly agnostic field of 'whatever works' methodology - it only further muddles the issue.
In my opinion, PMI-ACP will decrease in value or be completely removed because PMP will already have huge Agile section. PMI would have to spend millions to change HR/recruiter/business thinking (and yet, I have to read about this appetite).
Thus, I conclude that CSM will further rise in prominence and become de facto standard (if it is not already) for Agile certification for next few years.
Saving Changes...
Andrew SoswaTechnology leader| Leading global financial institutionElk Grove Village, Il, United States
Sep 17, 2019 6:28 PM
Replying to David Maynard
...
Hi Andrew, thank you for your comment.
This issue caused some quite a bit strain in the class. There were software developers that were pursuing their PMP and a group of (very nice folks) that had worked all of their career building forklifts to exacting specifications. So, half the class could easily understand agile methods, but the other half simply couldn't see how you could design / test / deliver a production product that way. It really lengthened the class and (much to the dismay of the university) I elected to hold some Saturday sessions to try to get everyone on the same level of understanding.
The bottom line is that (if I were honest and didn't hold class off-campus) the course would have taken about 3 or 4 weeks longer than it did with version 5.
Clearly this is the direction we, PMI and the body of practitioners have chosen to go in. It just REALLY makes a Project Management class harder to teach with a mixed group of students. Some students were very confused --- the software folks with the waterfall talk and the forklift folks with agile approaches. AND! They really can't be split up since both are important for the exam.
David, you hit the bullseye of the problem! Saving Changes...
Andrew SoswaTechnology leader| Leading global financial institutionElk Grove Village, Il, United States
Sep 17, 2019 6:30 PM
Replying to Keith Novak
...
If re-writing the PMBoK would include a completely different taxonomy to integrate those lifecycles, I could see that as problematic. An infinite number of taxonomies are possible, but some logical organizations of subject matter are easier to comprehend and manage than others. Some things fit nicely into certain groups, and others end up fractured and distributed among many groups.
As for the subject of people who don't "get" agile, I can completely relate. I come from a manufacturing industry where some parts have a several year lead time. There are aspects of a long predictive lifecycle necessary to make those projects succeed.
On the other hand, I've worked green field development, product improvement, cost reduction, problem resolution, process development, and a variety of other aspects of large programs where the agile concepts are very well suited. I can think of quite a few agile approaches I have used or seen over the years on mega-projects. Nobody called them agile, and everyone seemed to "get it" when we just explained how we were going to approach the solution to particular problems in a novel way.
Andrew SoswaTechnology leader| Leading global financial institutionElk Grove Village, Il, United States
Sep 18, 2019 2:02 PM
Replying to James Shields
...
Andrew -- thanks for the comment. I did take a look at it and what stands out is:
"About half of the examination will represent predictive project management approaches and the other half will represent agile or hybrid approaches." Perhaps Wysocki's 8th edition of Effective Project Management will be another book for PMP prep time, which covers TPM, APM and HPM.
But, I'm not following you on "... and their stance against CSM and others.". I view Scrum as a specific methodology under the umbrella of Agile (APM). PMI is not advocating or disavowing any particular approach to Agile's values and principles to my knowledge. Do you have information to the contrary?
On the PMP vs. ACP: I guess we will have to see how this plays out over the next couple of years. It would be helpful if PMI provided some clarity on certification roadmaps in the not-too-distant future.
Thank you James.
I don't have any 'insider information' - I try to simply note the fact. In my opinion, there is a huge delta between what HR & recruiters perceive the CSM certification to be -- and what is the reality of this certification ($1,200 cost, 2-or-3 days training, 30 questions open book, no need for any Agile or project management experience).
The HR/recruiters value CSM as it was gold Agile standard - in all Agile methodologies, including the hybrid waterfall/Agile.
There is no way that it can be unscrewed - and the PMP going into the truly agnostic field of 'whatever works' methodology - it only further muddles the issue.
In my opinion, PMI-ACP will decrease in value or be completely removed because PMP will already have huge Agile section. PMI would have to spend millions to change HR/recruiter/business thinking (and yet, I have to read about this appetite).
Thus, I conclude that CSM will further rise in prominence and become de facto standard (if it is not already) for Agile certification for next few years. Saving Changes...