Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Field knowledge V.S Project management knowledge

linkedin twitter facebook   Benefits Realization   Career Development   Information Technology  
avatar
Zaid .B Amman, Jordan
After graduated from my university major " planning and project management " i now work as a PMO Head officer in a software organization, My obsession in project management made me thirsty to learn everything about it and i like that alot, The only obstacle i am facing right now is the lack of understanding the business environment of an IT technical background knowledge by its functional means and systematics, My query is should i gain actual knowledge in the IT Field related to software development so i can understand this particular industry that i'm working on by assuming that i would be an IT project manager in the future.If yes, what kind of certifications i can get ? and is it a requirement for the project manager (or any related positions to project management; such as project coordinator, PMO, etc) gain that knowledge ?
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
avatar
Adrian Carlogea Australia
Nov 17, 2019 3:40 PM
Replying to Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
Most of my roles as a PM have been in a domain new to me. I would agree it's more difficult to "lead" teams who already have extensive domain knowledge when the PM is a newbie. But as I have said before in relation to similar conversations, that is what experts are for. You get expert knowledge from either inside the business or outsourced. While domain knowledge is always an advantage, more than often it is not necessary for managing projects especially when domain experts are within reach.
Yes but those experts are going to make critical decisions that impact the success of the project and you as a PM have absolutely no control over them.

In the above circumstances you can still manage projects but you will have a lot of critical issues beyond your control. From my experience a lot of projects went overbudget because the experts have either made decisions that proved not to be good or they were unable to finish the work on time. The PMs were unable to do anything about this.

If the PM does have domain knowledge, will he be able to make better technical decisions than the other experts? Maybe yes, maybe no but at least he would be in more control over the project.
...
2 replies by David Hill and Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
Nov 17, 2019 8:44 PM
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
Unless the PM has more knowledge than an expert, then he/she is bound to still make mistakes. A good approach is to include a very clear assumption that some decisions are made based on the advice and recommendations of the experts. I understand the argument about PM's having domain knowledge; I'm all for it. But if experts who invariably have more knowledge than the PM are available, and with the assumption I mentioned above in place, then the PM is a lot safer.
Jan 20, 2026 3:56 PM
David Hill
...
The real issue here is not whether the PM understands the technology, but whether the PM understands the project responsibilities and communicates them to the SME. As the project manager one must have the ability to get project management information from the SME. Keeping projects on schedule is not just a matter of getting the work done it is also a matter of good scheduling, proper communication, and a deep understanding of how to get the PM information you need from the SME. I have successfully managed dozens of projects for which I had little or no domain knowledge. Some of these project had multiple domains. There is no way a PM could be expected to be an expert in all domains. Reliance on domain knowledge simply limits the PM's ability to attract projects in other domains. I am currently managing a project in the Stormwater Management (civil engineering) domain and another in the Commercial Driver License/Commercial Motor Vehicle (transportation) domain. If domain knowledge were a requirement to manage the projects, I would not be around long. My primary background is in IT and Electrical Engineering.

I am here to report that not only are we on time, on budget, and meeting expectations/requirements, but I am also getting accolades along the way for helping to make the path clearer and more obtainable.
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Nov 17, 2019 7:19 PM
Replying to Adrian Carlogea
...
Yes but those experts are going to make critical decisions that impact the success of the project and you as a PM have absolutely no control over them.

In the above circumstances you can still manage projects but you will have a lot of critical issues beyond your control. From my experience a lot of projects went overbudget because the experts have either made decisions that proved not to be good or they were unable to finish the work on time. The PMs were unable to do anything about this.

If the PM does have domain knowledge, will he be able to make better technical decisions than the other experts? Maybe yes, maybe no but at least he would be in more control over the project.
Unless the PM has more knowledge than an expert, then he/she is bound to still make mistakes. A good approach is to include a very clear assumption that some decisions are made based on the advice and recommendations of the experts. I understand the argument about PM's having domain knowledge; I'm all for it. But if experts who invariably have more knowledge than the PM are available, and with the assumption I mentioned above in place, then the PM is a lot safer.
...
1 reply by Adrian Carlogea
Nov 18, 2019 6:46 PM
Adrian Carlogea
...
"[...] that some decisions are made based on the advice and recommendations of the experts"

When the PM has no domain knowledge the decisions are not made at the recommendations of the experts but they are made by the experts period.

If you are not an expert in a certain field how can you decide if the "recommendations" made by the experts in that field are good or not?

In real life PMs with no domain knowledge would not even think to question the decisions of the specialists. In fact it is not even their duty to do so. They just have to ensure that there are specialists on the project and that they have taken over the work and have made the decisions that are needed to complete the work.

When the PM has working experience in a relevant line of work he can question the specialists and raise issues about their plans.
avatar
Zaid .B Amman, Jordan
Nov 17, 2019 1:47 PM
Replying to Adrian Carlogea
...
I know a lot of people will feel offended by what I am about to say and I do appologies but a PM that does not have good domain (field) knowledge is seen by the project team members as a glorified secretary. That's a fact and you can't do anything about it.

The fact that the PM learns about the domain would help a little in communication but still such a PM would be seen as a glorified secretary and not a leader.

Still what project team members think about the PM does not matter that much. A PM that does not have domain knowledge is still valuable for the project it is just that the value is not in leading the team. Some companies in IT projects designate so called project technical managers to lead the team so the PMs only have to deal with these technical managers and not with the other team members.

If you are a PM without domain knowledge you should forget about leading, mentoring, coaching, inspiring, etc the team as you can't do that. You should focus more on the pure project management activities and try to bring value in this field.

Many companies hire project management interns from fresh college graduates meaning that domain knowledge is not considered important for the project manager role. These PMs however should forget about leading or managing the project team members. In time they may end up managing, as line managers, other project managers.
you clarified the problem accurately but you did not present the solution, because a project manager with no control over a team member (not managers) is not project management at all.
avatar
Zaid .B Amman, Jordan
Nov 17, 2019 12:22 PM
Replying to Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
You will learn more about the domain by simply working in it than any course or certification can provide.
I agree 100% But that is the challenge itself.
avatar
Zaid .B Amman, Jordan
Nov 17, 2019 10:20 AM
Replying to Drew Craig
...
Curious. What is your background aside from university?
my major university as project management was diversified including pure project management studying subject; such as PMBOK itself was a studying subject, risk management, schedule management, quality management, communication and procurement management were all studying subjects.
concepts from other sciences which related to projects were also included such as finance, feasibility studies, managerial economics and statistics from project management prospection.
many other concepts basically focusing on planning skills and implementation as an art and science.

So basically it is not specific or focusing in one knowledge area and also not focusing on a specific domain.
avatar
Zaid .B Amman, Jordan
Nov 17, 2019 11:39 AM
Replying to Kavitha Gunasekaran
...
Zaid,

It helps to better understand the domain in which you are working and there are several online courses, platforms like edX to help you get that overall knowledge, a kind off bird's eye view. Also, it is always a great idea to experiment in the early years of your career. All the best!

Kavitha
Good point, Thank you.
avatar
Zaid .B Amman, Jordan
Nov 17, 2019 10:50 AM
Replying to George Freeman
...
Zaid,

I agree with Sergio and Kiron! I’ve put together a fairly long response as this is one of the most important questions impacting our profession, and it’s also one of my favorite subjects - so, my apologies for the length.

PMI made a course correction in 2016 with the rollout of the “PMI Talent Triangle” and basically stated the following. As a profession, we need to transform if we wish to remain relevant and competitive in the marketplace. This transformation requires project professionals to have a foundation (i.e., a knowledge foundation) built on the following three elements: 1) Technical, 2) Leadership, and 3) Strategic and Business Management expertise. They went further and stated that this mix is the “ideal skillset,” and is the recipe for a successful practice.

With all due respect to Luis, the orchestra conductor analogy wherein “the conductor does not need to know how to play an instrument” is ambiguous in environments where constant change is the status quo. And in today’s “fill-in-the-blank transformation” environments, constant change is about the only norm we have, so we need to find a different balance.

I’m a firm believer in project professionals having “architectural awareness,” which is an approach for navigating domains (both business and technical) through architectural knowledge. Architectural knowledge is non-engineering big-picture knowledge that focuses on the strategy and structure of domains. Having architectural awareness does NOT mean that you are a subject matter expert or have technical delivery skills; it simply means you can Understand, Interpret, and Communicate within a domain using architectural knowledge.

An architecturally aware project professional will be able to (represented as competency levels):

- COLLABORATE: Comprehend, keep-up-with, and materially participate in domain-specific discussions using audience vernacular.
- MODERATE: Moderate discussions through acumen (i.e., keen insight) level knowledge of the subject matter.
- CHALLENGE: Challenge-out resolutions through theory (i.e., principled) level knowledge of the subject matter.

I recently conducted a poll with the following question, “If you could download domain knowledge into your being (outside of the technical PM domain), which of these purposes would influence you the most.” With around 80 respondents so far, the poll ranks as follows:

- Enhanced capability to lead through influence (31%)
- Career advancement as a project professional e.g., from PM to program manager (17%)
- Improved ability to collaborate and communicate across the project team (14%)
- A path to move from one domain to another as a PM (10%)
- Higher quality outputs and outcomes (7%)
- On-boarding my “Next-Gen PM” brain (7%)
- Advancing our profession (9%)
- Increased agility when responding to change (5%)

These items represent some of the “value propositions” of Architectural Awareness. So, to answer your question: You should gain architectural knowledge (as described above) in both the IT and Business domains related to your current and future projects.
Simple and right to the point, That was absolutely and utterly amazing.However, Is there any source were i can learn more about the three points you talked about them (moderate, collaborate and challenge) like techniques to use, More insight, etc ?
...
2 replies by George Freeman and Rami Kaibni
Nov 18, 2019 9:48 AM
George Freeman
...
Hi Zaid,

Myself and a colleague are putting together a presentation on the subject of Architectural Awareness.

The idea of navigating domains from an architectural viewpoint is not new; however, many project professionals disregard its value as the term “architectural” conjures up images of a highly-skilled engineer (i.e., an expert) who is operating on the delivery side of our profession.

Being able to navigate domains from an architectural (i.e., strategy and structure) viewpoint provides a project professional life-cycle knowledge of a domain and then (by that nature), its relationship to other domains as well. The beauty of this perspective is that you do not need to be an expert to acquire this knowledge.

The “collaborate, moderate, and challenge” aspects are essentially levels at which an architecturally aware project professional can operate within. If you or anyone else has an interest in this subject, then send me a message regarding your thoughts on it (e.g., does it sound practical or hypothetical, how would this help you in your practice, etc.). I assure you this is a practical venture and not hyperbolic theory.
Nov 19, 2019 2:04 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Zaid

Kiron and George's feedback are spot on and there is nothing much for me to add but I can give you a piece of advice regarding how you can learn to moderate, collaborate and challenge:

Those specific skills comes with experience and only with experience. You can certainly read a guide of the most effective and efficient ways to do so but you will benefit most if you do it yourself, learn, inspect and adapt because while the basics are the same, everyone is different.

You have a good solid educational background so you need to give yourself time to gain some practical experience in this field. Certifications at this point won't help you much but knowledge of your domain will so now it's your time to learn so in the near future you can combine this experience with your solid educational background and start leading the way yourself.

Good Luck.

RK
avatar
Lonnie Pacelli Author & President| ProjectManagementAdvisor.com Bellevue, Wa, United States
It's good to understand the business and IT aspects of your organization to a point that you gain the respect of your business partners and your IT developers. That doesn't mean you need to have the same level of experience they do; focus on having enough domain knowledge so you can keep up in discussions and, more importantly, make sound decisions.
avatar
Steve Ratkaj Ontario, Canada
I hate the term "experts", and honestly, throughout my 30 year career as an engineer involved with project management I can say I have met only a handful of people I would classify as experts. As such, it is my opinion, to dramatically increase the odds of success in a project, the PM must have extensive experience in that domain. This is just simple common sense. Would you want a PM to manage a ship building project with no ship building experience? Would you want a PM to manage a dam building project with no such experience?
I would suggest reading "The Path Between the Seas" by David McCullough for insight as to what happens when one has no such experience.
...
3 replies by David Hill, Keith Novak, and Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
Nov 18, 2019 11:46 AM
Keith Novak
...
I think the level of knowledge is relative to the specific position. If you are building a dam, do you have to be an expert in hydro electric generator design, road construction, structural engineering, environmental impact studies, financing, legal issues, etc., or do you as the PM rely on the specialists for the details, and focus on the system level where Team A impacts Team B, and how the various technical risks can impact the entire project?
Nov 18, 2019 12:04 PM
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD
...
How about "knowledgeable persons".
Jan 20, 2026 3:59 PM
David Hill
...
Keith Novak - you get it! The PM must be an expert in Project Management, then he/she can be successful managing these and all types of projects.
avatar
George Freeman Thought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
Nov 18, 2019 4:12 AM
Replying to Zaid .B
...
Simple and right to the point, That was absolutely and utterly amazing.However, Is there any source were i can learn more about the three points you talked about them (moderate, collaborate and challenge) like techniques to use, More insight, etc ?
Hi Zaid,

Myself and a colleague are putting together a presentation on the subject of Architectural Awareness.

The idea of navigating domains from an architectural viewpoint is not new; however, many project professionals disregard its value as the term “architectural” conjures up images of a highly-skilled engineer (i.e., an expert) who is operating on the delivery side of our profession.

Being able to navigate domains from an architectural (i.e., strategy and structure) viewpoint provides a project professional life-cycle knowledge of a domain and then (by that nature), its relationship to other domains as well. The beauty of this perspective is that you do not need to be an expert to acquire this knowledge.

The “collaborate, moderate, and challenge” aspects are essentially levels at which an architecturally aware project professional can operate within. If you or anyone else has an interest in this subject, then send me a message regarding your thoughts on it (e.g., does it sound practical or hypothetical, how would this help you in your practice, etc.). I assure you this is a practical venture and not hyperbolic theory.
...
1 reply by Suzi MS
Nov 19, 2019 5:01 PM
Suzi MS
...
Hi George couldn't agree more with Zaid’s reply to you. You see - like some blogs there is a tool to ‘add as favourite’ how I wish we have a tool to ‘add selective responses as favourite’ :-)
Loads for fantastic share from the seniors here, thank you Zaid for bringing up this topic!
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Conventional people are roused to fury by departure from convention, largely because they regard such departure as a criticism of themselves."

- Bertrand Russell

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors