Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

What do you think of PMaas? (Project Management as a service)

linkedin twitter facebook   Career Development   Consulting   Talent Management  
avatar
Alexandre Costa Scrum Master| Integer Consulting - Pictet technologies Loures, Portugal
Using professional external project managers, instead of house project managers that already know the processes of the organization, culture and have an existing network of relationship.
Do you see pros and cons on this approach?
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 >
avatar
Sara Harper Gallagher PMO & Strategy Execution Expert | President (Persimmon)| The Persimmon Group Tulsa, Ok, United States

DISCLAIMER: I run a company that provides PMs to clients. (But I'll try to be unbiased).



Over the years, I've seen some clear patterns in when external consulting PMs don't work well:



1. There's no plan (or time) to get them up to speed quickly on your org dynamics.



2. Stakeholders are uncomfortable working with outsiders (e.g., they've had bad experiences in the past they can't let go of. It's setting your external PM up to fail).



3. You're hoping they'll manage lots of projects at once. That's usually suited better to a leased worker you hire directly as staff augmentation. The best use case for an external consulting PM is to manage a single, high-stakes project. (Consulting PMs usually bring more expertise...but higher rates).



4. You already have the budget for a permanent hire, where the long-term retention of knowledge is a better investment.



When external consulting PMs do work well, it's usually because clients:



1. Onboard them intentionally, rather than hoping they'll figure it out on their own.



2. Give candid feedback about what's landing (and what isn't) as they learn the culture.



3. Structure pricing in a way that builds trust and accountability, not suspicion. I recommend fixed cost/month vs. hourly rates which can encourage inflation.



4. Ask them not just to "deliver the project," but to leave behind process improvements.



5. Insist on good artifacts and transition planning, in case the project needs to move back in-house.



That's what I've seen anyway. Curious about other people's experience? (It might help me run our business better!)

< 1 2 3 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"If you want to please only the critics, don't play too loud, too soft, too fast or too slow."

- Arturo Toscanini

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors