Apr 10, 2020 11:04 AM
Replying to Daire Guiney
...
Dear Adrian, Peter,
You both present different views as to how you see the role of the project manager.
One is a "gun for hire" who seem has no formal authority, then probably no respect from his "crew" and can only manage by favors and kowtowing to his superiors.
The other view is a project manager who does not know how the ship works but got the job because his father owns the company.
A captain must know and understand every aspect of his ship before he/she can move up through the ranks. That includes how the engine works, how to repair the propellers and how to steer the ship.
There are no shortcuts to being a captain just like the example of the Costa Concordia and how lack of knowledge led to the deaths of innocent people.
So a distinct and understood chain of command that can be implemented is what is required.
Also project sponsors and owners are sometimes so far removed from the project they have very little if any interest in the project.
It is the project managers responsibility and job to know what project success is and to ensure that it is delivered.
Functional manager and the hierarchy of the organisation will hire an outside project manager to mitigate the risk to themselves in the event of project failure and sometimes will contribute very little as a result.
Also if the project requires change management then this will further distant the functional mangers from the project managers.
Ultimately the project manager devises the project plan that all the stakeholders agree and sign up to and so should be self sufficient that requires little overall guidance and management but to adhere to the project plan and any change requests that come in.
Daire