International Project Management Day 2020
November 5, 2020, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. EDT  November 6, 2020 – February 7, 2021, OnDemand  Online Conference
Please login or join to subscribe to this thread




Pooja
If I am not mistaken, this is a Finish to Start relationship because C can’t start before both A and B are complete. If no other conditions exist between A and B, it also creates a convergence node as the start of C is tied with the finish of both A and B with a lead time from A of two weeks. RK
There is no information about the starts of A or B. Both need to finish before C can start (and A has a lag of 2 weeks for that).
So I would go with D, finish to finish. ...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Jun 27, 2020 1:35 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
ThomasI have to disagree. If C cannot finish before A and B finish then that’s a Finish to Finish relationship but the situation is C can’t start before A and B finish so it’s a Finish to Start relationship. Info about the start of A and B is irrelevant for what the situation is asking for. RK Jun 27, 2020 1:20 PM
Replying to Thomas Walenta
...
There is no information about the starts of A or B. Both need to finish before C can start (and A has a lag of 2 weeks for that).
So I would go with D, finish to finish. I have to disagree. If C cannot finish before A and B finish then that’s a Finish to Finish relationship but the situation is C can’t start before A and B finish so it’s a Finish to Start relationship. Info about the start of A and B is irrelevant for what the situation is asking for. RK ...
1 reply by Thomas Walenta
Jun 27, 2020 1:55 PM
Thomas Walenta
...
Hi Rami,
it is a finish to start relationship between A and C as well B and C. Between A and B it is not, but that is the question. Thomas Interesting. Jun 27, 2020 1:35 PM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
ThomasI have to disagree. If C cannot finish before A and B finish then that’s a Finish to Finish relationship but the situation is C can’t start before A and B finish so it’s a Finish to Start relationship. Info about the start of A and B is irrelevant for what the situation is asking for. RK it is a finish to start relationship between A and C as well B and C. Between A and B it is not, but that is the question. Thomas Interesting. ...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Jun 27, 2020 2:22 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Thomas
I stand corrected, I totally missed that. For some reason I thought the question is asking about the relationship between C and (A/B). The relationship between A and B given the current situation is a Finish to Finish because that is the only answer that makes sense given the info about the start of C. However, the question is a bit vague. Thank you for correcting me. RK
Rami Kaibni, I also gave the same answer as you mentioned but PMI goes with Thomas.
Thomas, I am still not clear why Finish to Finish is the answer when no information of A and B relationship is given. B can finish after A or A can finish after B or Both can start or finish at the same time.
Hi Pooja,
well, there is information given about A and B, though indirectly (both are predecessors of C). If you bring this together and since there is no information about the starts of either A or B, the only thing you can conclude is about the finishing of A and B. It is not a perfect logical conclusion though. I did not succeed to find a f2f clause that describes their relationship without considering C. For example ' B has to finish when A finished plus 2 weeks' is not true. But with any question, the correct answer could be the only one that is not plain wrong. Thomas ...
1 reply by Pooja Sharma
Jun 28, 2020 6:58 AM
Pooja Sharma
...
Thanks for your reply. Agree with your explanation.
Jun 27, 2020 1:55 PM
Replying to Thomas Walenta
...
Hi Rami,
it is a finish to start relationship between A and C as well B and C. Between A and B it is not, but that is the question. Thomas Interesting. I stand corrected, I totally missed that. For some reason I thought the question is asking about the relationship between C and (A/B). The relationship between A and B given the current situation is a Finish to Finish because that is the only answer that makes sense given the info about the start of C. However, the question is a bit vague. Thank you for correcting me. RK Jun 27, 2020 2:19 PM
Replying to Thomas Walenta
...
Hi Pooja, well, there is information given about A and B, though indirectly (both are predecessors of C). If you bring this together and since there is no information about the starts of either A or B, the only thing you can conclude is about the finishing of A and B. It is not a perfect logical conclusion though. I did not succeed to find a f2f clause that describes their relationship without considering C. For example ' B has to finish when A finished plus 2 weeks' is not true. But with any question, the correct answer could be the only one that is not plain wrong. Thomas 
Please login or join to reply
"Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining."  Jeff Raskin 