Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Will Project Management ever stop evolving?

linkedin twitter facebook   Change Management   Organizational Culture   Sustainability  
avatar
Stephen Robin Project Analyst Trainee| Ministry of Works and Transport Arima, Ari, Trinidad and Tobago
The common and accepted notion is that project management is still and will continue to evolve as time passes. From it being a practice to a full fledge profession and so on. With the many currents and future trends taking place and the field being highly receptive to change.

This begs the question, will there be an endpoint where the evolution stops and things become stabilized? Or will it continue to be a rolling wave as we see now?

Thoughts?
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
avatar
Shani Glapion Fiber Project Manager| Comcast Antioch, Tn, United States
As people evolve, so will PM. Thoughts and priorities change, which allows for expansion in the field. I think the basic concept of project management is pretty solidified but expansion of any industry will cause of expansion of the project management industry.
...
1 reply by Stephen Robin
Aug 01, 2022 11:13 AM
Stephen Robin
...
Interesting point Shani. Seeing that thoughts and priorities change over the course of one's lifetime expansion in the field is always looming. Due to the core principles and fundamentals that could fall into any industry, significant change will affect the field directly or indirectly. I think this aligns with my point about how the field is highly receptive to change.

I could definitely see the uprise of project management practices tailored to suit a particular industry in some form. An example is the micro-credential released by the PMI for construction professionals.

What do you think?
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Jul 30, 2022 3:31 PM
Replying to Stephen Robin
...
Thanks for the input Rami. Do you expect any massive changes to how project managers will get things done in the future in comparison to the current state? Or will there just be incremental changes here and there?
Stephen

This is heavily dependent on the industry - For example, in Healthcare, I expect major shifts while in Construction it will be incremental changes.

RK
avatar
Stephen Robin Project Analyst Trainee| Ministry of Works and Transport Arima, Ari, Trinidad and Tobago
Jul 31, 2022 11:53 AM
Replying to Shani Glapion
...
As people evolve, so will PM. Thoughts and priorities change, which allows for expansion in the field. I think the basic concept of project management is pretty solidified but expansion of any industry will cause of expansion of the project management industry.
Interesting point Shani. Seeing that thoughts and priorities change over the course of one's lifetime expansion in the field is always looming. Due to the core principles and fundamentals that could fall into any industry, significant change will affect the field directly or indirectly. I think this aligns with my point about how the field is highly receptive to change.

I could definitely see the uprise of project management practices tailored to suit a particular industry in some form. An example is the micro-credential released by the PMI for construction professionals.

What do you think?
avatar
Peter Rapin Subject Matter Expect; Project Delivery| Independent Consultant Ontario, Canada
Project Management will stop evolving if and when it becomes solely a process or system of processes - where there is a formula and check list for every eventuality.
The need to manage is what separates humans from other life forms which survive by accepting reality without a need to change that reality. Will humanity ever go back to that?
I see project management getting more and more complicated and process oriented until it no longer serves our purpose. Then there will be a demand for "back-to-basics" and we start over again with an attempt to avoid earlier missteps.

Simpler question - "will humanity ever stop evolving?" Looking at current politics I sometimes think we are in the 'going backwards' phase (sorry, couldn't resist).
...
1 reply by Stephen Robin
Aug 04, 2022 8:06 AM
Stephen Robin
...
Thought-provoking points Peter. In the case of developing to the point where there is a formula and checklist for every eventuality sounds feasible on paper until applied to real life. From my perspective, the reality is far too complex to account for every factor and in more circumstances, than you think, there are no solutions, only trade-offs. Although this won't stop people from trying as I see this situation where it is aiming for the stars and fall on the treetops type scenario.

I share the sentiment of the back-to-basics. I believe the tools, techniques, and methodologies have become more complicated but the fundamentals haven't changed. I firmly believe those who excel at the fundamentals of project management would be more effective rather than those who find the need to grab something from the project management toolbox for every course of action. The tools are meant to assist in performance rather than replace it.


Furthermore, I am pretty open to the conversation of the prospect of regression in humanity. I say will are still evolving but what changes there would be regress in some areas. Look at the fact that many are incapable of functioning without their mobile device or the studies that showed the average attention span has decreased over the years. Moreover how many can survive in the wild like our ancestors? So in many cases, we win and lose.

At the same time, project management is expected to continuously evolve and grow without regression. This brings the train of thought, do you think there are any real threats to project management's evolution?
avatar
Thomas Walenta Global Project Economy Expert Hackenheim, Germany
Jul 30, 2022 4:06 PM
Replying to Stephen Robin
...
Very good points. As long as it exists and humanity practices it, it will evolve. Interesting statistic as I wasn't aware of the number of those that are knowledgable was so low in comparison. I can predict that countries and regions that develop project management to a point where they create their own tools, techniques, methodologies, and governing bodies. Example Latin America and the Caribbean.

Would like to know how religion is a factor and how it ties into project management.
Both PM and religions are based on fundamental beliefs, that cannot be or have not be proven. And people outside the belief system are often looking bemused at practitioners (followers) or champions (priests). Try to sell PM to some executives or at down-to-earth workers.

Some beliefs of project managers are that the systems approach of processes, KPIs etc. is improving outcomes. Did not happen in 50 years, but made practitioners happy. Or look at the sect of agilistas, believing in manifesto statements.

An other aspect of religion and PM is that current PM theory is based on rationality, data driven decision making or a linear time concept driven by protestantic thinking. It is very close to economic concepts, which also have many flaws in real life.

Though there are some approaches looking at the human side, irrationality, gut based decision making.
avatar
Stephen Robin Project Analyst Trainee| Ministry of Works and Transport Arima, Ari, Trinidad and Tobago
Aug 02, 2022 4:11 PM
Replying to Peter Rapin
...
Project Management will stop evolving if and when it becomes solely a process or system of processes - where there is a formula and check list for every eventuality.
The need to manage is what separates humans from other life forms which survive by accepting reality without a need to change that reality. Will humanity ever go back to that?
I see project management getting more and more complicated and process oriented until it no longer serves our purpose. Then there will be a demand for "back-to-basics" and we start over again with an attempt to avoid earlier missteps.

Simpler question - "will humanity ever stop evolving?" Looking at current politics I sometimes think we are in the 'going backwards' phase (sorry, couldn't resist).
Thought-provoking points Peter. In the case of developing to the point where there is a formula and checklist for every eventuality sounds feasible on paper until applied to real life. From my perspective, the reality is far too complex to account for every factor and in more circumstances, than you think, there are no solutions, only trade-offs. Although this won't stop people from trying as I see this situation where it is aiming for the stars and fall on the treetops type scenario.

I share the sentiment of the back-to-basics. I believe the tools, techniques, and methodologies have become more complicated but the fundamentals haven't changed. I firmly believe those who excel at the fundamentals of project management would be more effective rather than those who find the need to grab something from the project management toolbox for every course of action. The tools are meant to assist in performance rather than replace it.


Furthermore, I am pretty open to the conversation of the prospect of regression in humanity. I say will are still evolving but what changes there would be regress in some areas. Look at the fact that many are incapable of functioning without their mobile device or the studies that showed the average attention span has decreased over the years. Moreover how many can survive in the wild like our ancestors? So in many cases, we win and lose.

At the same time, project management is expected to continuously evolve and grow without regression. This brings the train of thought, do you think there are any real threats to project management's evolution?
...
1 reply by Peter Rapin
Aug 09, 2022 5:42 PM
Peter Rapin
...
Homo Habilis, the first hominid species to make stone tools would be ill equipped to comment on the limitations or threats to the evolution of Homo Sapiens. How can we, Homo Sapiens, expect to have any expertise on the limitations of our future evolved beings let alone what management concepts and tools they may employ?
avatar
Aaron Porter
Community Champion
IT Director| Blade HQ Payson, UT, United States
Is project management evolving?

Similar questions come up, here and in other forums, from time to time. A popular question seems to be "How will project management be different in X years?"

Is it really all that different? Has the core of project management changed so much in the last few decades that it is no longer recognizable as what used to be considered project management? I don't mean the tools used to manage projects, I mean the core of project management - the coordination of a unique effort to produce a product or service.

I would argue that project management hasn't evolved and isn't evolving. We've adapted it to fit different situations. Tools have been improved. One company might approach it differently than another. Additional roles and concepts have been bolted on, but, for example, portfolio management is still separate from project management regardless of how tightly integrated they are. Not every company uses portfolio management processes, and they still manage to run successful projects.

Evolution is a permanent change into something else that cannot be undone. Adaptation is variation in response to external influences and can revert as external influences change, but the thing that is changing still remains what it was. We have adapted project management to fit situations that may not have existed before, but I sometimes wonder if we are afflicted with the law of the instrument, or hammer and nail syndrome - "To a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." ~ Maslow/Kaplan?

AI is not going to turn project management into something else. Some companies will use it and project managers will adapt to it. Some companies won't. I've heard people say that VR will change how we manage projects. But will it? It might change how we meet. It might result in new tools. But will project management evolve into something else as a result of VR?

As our ancestors learned how to make better and better tools, they did not evolve into something else. They may have found that they now had time for other pursuits. Similarly, as new tools and processes come into play for project managers, project management doesn't change, but we may find that we have more time for other disciplines that improve the overall effectiveness of project deliverables and increase value for the companies we serve.

I managed projects for seven years before I was given the title "Project Manager." That didn't change what was expected of me or what I accomplished. I adapted. I (hopefully) improved. In the last 20 years, I've become more than a project manager, but not every company needs project managers that are more than project managers. Most companies need more than project management to be successful, and their project managers might do more than manage projects, but that doesn't change the nature of project management.

As project managers, we may adapt to our changing circumstances and popular tools and processes in project management may vary over time and between companies, but unless projects evolve into something else and what projects are today no longer exist, project management will only adapt, not evolve.
...
1 reply by Stephen Robin
Aug 09, 2022 7:49 AM
Stephen Robin
...
An excellent take on the subject matter Aaron. There has been an explosion in new tools, techniques, and methodologies, which will continue to happen as the world changes. When people speak of evolution we assume a dramatic shift that is completely unrecognizable. The thing is, does evolution have to be completely unrecognizable from what was in the past? There will be permanent changes but some aspects will never change with time (Eg Triple constraint). Some distinct traits will always be there and change for the sake of change can lead to complications.

Similarly, the evolution of apes to modern-day humans supposedly took millions of years. It could take a couple more decades before we see a remolding of the core of project management and its expansion.

I do agree with the point on the focus on adaptation as in any project, change is inevitable so project managers will adjust to suit. This is reflected in many tools and techniques in the practice that is made to accommodate internal and external changes.

Although I believe there is duality in the mix as I see two forms. The first being adaptive and the second being evolutionary.

Adaptive- the primary driver of project management and is constant
Evolutionary- extremely slow and incremental in nature

Therefore the time it takes project management to adapt versus the time it would take to evolve differs greatly. It is unlikely it will adapt and evolve at the same rate and frequency due to its nature. So want can be presented as evolution is actually adaptation and vice versa.

What do you think?
avatar
Peter Rapin Subject Matter Expect; Project Delivery| Independent Consultant Ontario, Canada
Project management evolved from risk management and will probably evolve back to risk management - but, hopefully, an improved version.
...
1 reply by Stephen Robin
Aug 09, 2022 6:34 AM
Stephen Robin
...
I was under the school of thought that project management is an original practice rather than derived from something else. Especially with risk management being a knowledge area. So how did project management evolve from risk management and how will it evolve back? As this sounds like retrogression.
avatar
Stephen Robin Project Analyst Trainee| Ministry of Works and Transport Arima, Ari, Trinidad and Tobago
Aug 05, 2022 5:26 PM
Replying to Peter Rapin
...
Project management evolved from risk management and will probably evolve back to risk management - but, hopefully, an improved version.
I was under the school of thought that project management is an original practice rather than derived from something else. Especially with risk management being a knowledge area. So how did project management evolve from risk management and how will it evolve back? As this sounds like retrogression.
...
1 reply by Peter Rapin
Aug 09, 2022 5:25 PM
Peter Rapin
...
Project Management is a sub-set of Management. A recognized definition of Management is an effort to seek an organizational goal. We seek to organize in order to get things done effectively: that is - enhance the benefits and reduce risks associated with applying effort. Thus management is a risk mitigating measure.

Eating, sleeping and staying alive are original practices - not management.

Management has evolved to more effectively achieve these original practices from organizing hunting parties, sowing and reaping crops, providing shelter and warding off threats. As the human population grew and society became more complex man invented the concept of projects and applied management skills to those projects. Thus we now have project management.

Many thought that operating equipment including driving cars was going to be 'forever'. However we now see that IT can do a pretty good job piloting equipment - in some cases better than humans. Once project management is a collection of processes and checklists than I can see the day that IT (AI) can provide 97% of project management functions, maybe even 100%.

Last thought "project management is a knowledge area within risk management"
avatar
Stephen Robin Project Analyst Trainee| Ministry of Works and Transport Arima, Ari, Trinidad and Tobago
Aug 04, 2022 11:04 AM
Replying to Aaron Porter
...
Is project management evolving?

Similar questions come up, here and in other forums, from time to time. A popular question seems to be "How will project management be different in X years?"

Is it really all that different? Has the core of project management changed so much in the last few decades that it is no longer recognizable as what used to be considered project management? I don't mean the tools used to manage projects, I mean the core of project management - the coordination of a unique effort to produce a product or service.

I would argue that project management hasn't evolved and isn't evolving. We've adapted it to fit different situations. Tools have been improved. One company might approach it differently than another. Additional roles and concepts have been bolted on, but, for example, portfolio management is still separate from project management regardless of how tightly integrated they are. Not every company uses portfolio management processes, and they still manage to run successful projects.

Evolution is a permanent change into something else that cannot be undone. Adaptation is variation in response to external influences and can revert as external influences change, but the thing that is changing still remains what it was. We have adapted project management to fit situations that may not have existed before, but I sometimes wonder if we are afflicted with the law of the instrument, or hammer and nail syndrome - "To a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." ~ Maslow/Kaplan?

AI is not going to turn project management into something else. Some companies will use it and project managers will adapt to it. Some companies won't. I've heard people say that VR will change how we manage projects. But will it? It might change how we meet. It might result in new tools. But will project management evolve into something else as a result of VR?

As our ancestors learned how to make better and better tools, they did not evolve into something else. They may have found that they now had time for other pursuits. Similarly, as new tools and processes come into play for project managers, project management doesn't change, but we may find that we have more time for other disciplines that improve the overall effectiveness of project deliverables and increase value for the companies we serve.

I managed projects for seven years before I was given the title "Project Manager." That didn't change what was expected of me or what I accomplished. I adapted. I (hopefully) improved. In the last 20 years, I've become more than a project manager, but not every company needs project managers that are more than project managers. Most companies need more than project management to be successful, and their project managers might do more than manage projects, but that doesn't change the nature of project management.

As project managers, we may adapt to our changing circumstances and popular tools and processes in project management may vary over time and between companies, but unless projects evolve into something else and what projects are today no longer exist, project management will only adapt, not evolve.
An excellent take on the subject matter Aaron. There has been an explosion in new tools, techniques, and methodologies, which will continue to happen as the world changes. When people speak of evolution we assume a dramatic shift that is completely unrecognizable. The thing is, does evolution have to be completely unrecognizable from what was in the past? There will be permanent changes but some aspects will never change with time (Eg Triple constraint). Some distinct traits will always be there and change for the sake of change can lead to complications.

Similarly, the evolution of apes to modern-day humans supposedly took millions of years. It could take a couple more decades before we see a remolding of the core of project management and its expansion.

I do agree with the point on the focus on adaptation as in any project, change is inevitable so project managers will adjust to suit. This is reflected in many tools and techniques in the practice that is made to accommodate internal and external changes.

Although I believe there is duality in the mix as I see two forms. The first being adaptive and the second being evolutionary.

Adaptive- the primary driver of project management and is constant
Evolutionary- extremely slow and incremental in nature

Therefore the time it takes project management to adapt versus the time it would take to evolve differs greatly. It is unlikely it will adapt and evolve at the same rate and frequency due to its nature. So want can be presented as evolution is actually adaptation and vice versa.

What do you think?
...
1 reply by Aaron Porter
Aug 10, 2022 11:20 AM
Aaron Porter
...
Stephen wrote: "does evolution have to be completely unrecognizable from what was in the past?"

Isn't that the definition of evolution? If project management is evolving, it's becoming something else, not just a refactored approach to produce a unique product or service.

Are there any project management approaches, currently in use, that aren't refactorings of earlier approaches combined with more modern tools? Disciplined Agile, SAFe, Scrum, etc... - variations on a theme that have been adapted to address certain perceived deficiencies of earlier approaches (often because somebody was selling something).

Maybe I'm just arguing semantics. If you were to say that the role of the project manager is evolving, I might be more inclined to agree, but given how different the expectations of project managers are between companies, I'd probably lean more toward localized adaptation. Some project managers might be doing more than just project management, but the project management function hasn't changed significantly.

A thought just came to mind. Perhaps it's the generally accepted definition of project management, or the generally accepted definition of the role of the project manager (if either could be said to exist - maybe locally accepted?), that is evolving. When it comes to what I do as a project manager, it hasn't changed much in 20 years, but what I was doing 20 years ago was often more than the PMBOK definition of a project manager.

In the end, I think it's just words. Think about some of Al Shalloway's posts about Scrum on LinkedIn over the last few months. He's come across as anti-scrum. Why? One reason is that Scrum doesn't solve some of the problems he's trying to solve. Another is that he's selling a "new" approach, that's not really new but it might offer some new perspectives. Is he right? Does Scrum not work? It has worked well for some companies, and others have struggled with it and moved on. In spite of his approach, what he's doing is something we should all be doing, regardless of the approach we're using - inspect and adapt.
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

Whenever you are asked if you can do a job, tell 'em, "Certainly, I can!" Then get busy and find out how to do it.

- Theodore Roosevelt

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors