Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Evaluation-only projects with separate implementation projects

linkedin twitter facebook   Organizational Project Management   PMO   Using PMI Standards  
avatar
Christine Smith IT Project Manager| Select Medical East Berlin, Pa, United States
My executive leadership team wants to make an evaluation of a solution one project, and the execution of the solution a separate project. To me this should all be under one project. I've struggled to find any documented guidance. Does anyone have direction or thoughts on this? I want to be flexible but also want to stay true to proper project oversight.
Sort By:
avatar
Keith Novak Tukwila, Wa, United States
What you describe can help organizing projects at the PMO level.

Before funding a full project, you may require funding for in-depth investigation to determine if a project is merited. On something that is a lengthy process, a process performed in multiple locations or by multiple people, where RFIs are required, etc. it can be a large enough effort to require formal authorization and status accounting.

I am currently in a similar situation where we are working high value process and product improvements. Step 1 is containment where we often put a short term solution in place until a longer term fix is available. Breaking it into 2 projects helps to avoid confusion in our tracking and reporting systems when the containment step is at the implementation phase for example, while the preferred solution may be at the idea generation phase.
...
1 reply by Christine Smith
Feb 10, 2023 5:22 PM
Christine Smith
...
Thank you, Keith. I appreciate your input.
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Christine -

Whether it is done as two projects or two phases within the same project, this is something I've run into frequently, especially when there is a desire for firm cost and time estimates on the implementation work. The first project usually involves gathering sufficient requirements to go through an RFI/RFP/vendor selection/contracting exercise and the second is able to be planned with a high degree of confidence given the legwork done in the first one.

I prefer the phased approach as it is hard to justify the costs of the first project based on just having a solid plan and signed contract as key deliverables.

And with the phased approach, a gate would exist between the two phases providing management the opportunity to cut their losses if no solution appears promising.

Kiron
...
1 reply by Christine Smith
Feb 10, 2023 5:23 PM
Christine Smith
...
I agree completely. Thank you, Kiron.
avatar
Christine Smith IT Project Manager| Select Medical East Berlin, Pa, United States
Feb 10, 2023 1:15 PM
Replying to Keith Novak
...
What you describe can help organizing projects at the PMO level.

Before funding a full project, you may require funding for in-depth investigation to determine if a project is merited. On something that is a lengthy process, a process performed in multiple locations or by multiple people, where RFIs are required, etc. it can be a large enough effort to require formal authorization and status accounting.

I am currently in a similar situation where we are working high value process and product improvements. Step 1 is containment where we often put a short term solution in place until a longer term fix is available. Breaking it into 2 projects helps to avoid confusion in our tracking and reporting systems when the containment step is at the implementation phase for example, while the preferred solution may be at the idea generation phase.
Thank you, Keith. I appreciate your input.
avatar
Christine Smith IT Project Manager| Select Medical East Berlin, Pa, United States
Feb 10, 2023 4:47 PM
Replying to Kiron Bondale
...
Christine -

Whether it is done as two projects or two phases within the same project, this is something I've run into frequently, especially when there is a desire for firm cost and time estimates on the implementation work. The first project usually involves gathering sufficient requirements to go through an RFI/RFP/vendor selection/contracting exercise and the second is able to be planned with a high degree of confidence given the legwork done in the first one.

I prefer the phased approach as it is hard to justify the costs of the first project based on just having a solid plan and signed contract as key deliverables.

And with the phased approach, a gate would exist between the two phases providing management the opportunity to cut their losses if no solution appears promising.

Kiron
I agree completely. Thank you, Kiron.
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
I've had a few of these types of multi-projects. It is usually a gating process: let's invest a little to find out if we want to go further.

Think of it as a series of incremental projects. You get the benefit of learning more in each project which allows you to make better decisions on the next.
...
1 reply by Christine Smith
Feb 11, 2023 9:49 AM
Christine Smith
...
Great perspective. Thank you.
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
Usually, along the years, I was involved to do that in separate projects. To put this in terms of the PMI business analyst (BA) is accountable for all related to evaluation and project manager (PM) for all related to project if it is approved. Obviously, BA will work along the project too. You can find all related to both activities inside the PMI standards. The only thing, in my experience, is some organizations do not consider the evaluation as a project itself. I always try to push it.
...
1 reply by Christine Smith
Feb 11, 2023 9:51 AM
Christine Smith
...
Thank you for your input.
avatar
Christine Smith IT Project Manager| Select Medical East Berlin, Pa, United States
Feb 10, 2023 7:33 PM
Replying to Stéphane Parent
...
I've had a few of these types of multi-projects. It is usually a gating process: let's invest a little to find out if we want to go further.

Think of it as a series of incremental projects. You get the benefit of learning more in each project which allows you to make better decisions on the next.
Great perspective. Thank you.
avatar
Christine Smith IT Project Manager| Select Medical East Berlin, Pa, United States
Feb 11, 2023 5:36 AM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
Usually, along the years, I was involved to do that in separate projects. To put this in terms of the PMI business analyst (BA) is accountable for all related to evaluation and project manager (PM) for all related to project if it is approved. Obviously, BA will work along the project too. You can find all related to both activities inside the PMI standards. The only thing, in my experience, is some organizations do not consider the evaluation as a project itself. I always try to push it.
Thank you for your input.
avatar
Thomas Walenta Global Project Economy Expert Hackenheim, Germany
Christine,

in my life I worked mostly on split projects, as we developed proposals for customers and then, after signing, implemented them.

- Having smaller projects increases the probability of success.
- Putting experienced PMs on each of the different project types is also a good idea, different skill sets are needed (so we had proposal PMs and delivery PMs).
- often success for these types of PMs is defined differently (signings vs. profits) and hence behaviours (e.g. risk attitudes, relationship mgmt) are more to the point
- estimates and promises for the implementation project will be much better after you did the analysis project, just because you know more about the solution and already made some decisions - increasing trust and enabling fix price contracts
- A problem might be the handover between proposal and delivery, but if it is done well on customer and delivery side it is even beneficial since any hickups from the proposal project are irrelevant.
- It also allows for a 3rd type of project: the change management, which again requires different skills and setup
- if complexity is high and you need integration on a higher level, a joint steering committee can provide governance, an architecture body can ensure strategic alignments and integration, a PMO can help with e.g. standards, tools, resourcing - and if that all applies you might setup the whole initiative as a program
- overall risk is lower
avatar
Latha Thamma reddi Sr Product and Portfolio Management (Automation Innovation)| DXC Technology Mckinney, Tx, United States
Thanks for sharing.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Opera is where a guy gets stabbed in the back, and instead of dying, he sings."

- Robert Benchley

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors