Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Agile helps people and teams deliver value incrementally in a collaborative manner.

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile   Information Technology   Scrum  
avatar
Koti Rupendra Rama Rao Agile IT Senior Technical Program Manager & Agile Scrum Technical Frame Lead| HCL TECH Services Technologies Ltd India
Agile methodologies enable organizations to deliver value to customers faster and in more satisfying ways with fewer complications by systematically managing projects and developing software using an incremental and iterative work process.
Sort By:
avatar
Koti Rupendra Rama Rao Agile IT Senior Technical Program Manager & Agile Scrum Technical Frame Lead| HCL TECH Services Technologies Ltd India
This traditional Agile methodology has always been a great innovation.
avatar
Pawel Remigiusz Wojtal Team Manager - Operations, Transformation and Quality Office| Nokia Wroclaw, Poland
I'm not sure what is your question. Agile methodologies, including scrum, has its own characteristic - pros and cons. Some projects may go better with agile, and some - with a traditional approach. As usual - it depends - on the complexity, level of uncertainty, innovation, clarity of requirements, experience of the team, practices in an organization, influence of key stakeholders or even the experience of the project manager.

I like this kind of graphic to have some more illustration of agile vs. waterfall: https://www.agile-minds.com/wp-content/upl.../03/image-1.png

So - I would disagree that agile and Scrum is ALWAYS good choice. It depends.
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Koti -

Scrum and adaptive approaches can work well but only when they fit the context of the work being done and the culture they are introduced into.

Scrum is not a project management framework and hence to make it fit a project lifecycle, it needs to be extended - it does not address transition/delivery concerns, nor does it consider factors such as getting funding, forming a team, defining the product vision and so on.

Kiron
...
1 reply by Kwiyuh Michael Wepngong
Dec 24, 2023 12:07 PM
Kwiyuh Michael Wepngong
...
Kiron's deep insight expressed in this response is a master's class! Thanks
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Koti, what is the question behind your post?
avatar
Abolfazl Yousefi Darestani Manager, Quality and Continuous Improvement| Hörmann-TNR Industrial Doors Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Seems good. however, what is your question?
avatar
Kwiyuh Michael Wepngong
Community Champion
Financial Management Specialist | US Peace Corps Yaounde, Centre, Cameroon
Aug 22, 2023 7:49 AM
Replying to Kiron Bondale
...
Koti -

Scrum and adaptive approaches can work well but only when they fit the context of the work being done and the culture they are introduced into.

Scrum is not a project management framework and hence to make it fit a project lifecycle, it needs to be extended - it does not address transition/delivery concerns, nor does it consider factors such as getting funding, forming a team, defining the product vision and so on.

Kiron
Kiron's deep insight expressed in this response is a master's class! Thanks
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
With all my due respect, the problem in general and what has generated a common missunderstanding that is jeopardazing the use of Agile approach is calling things Agile <something>. I know, lot of people do that including lot of organizations. Agile is an approach that was born in manufacturing in 1990 to find an alternative to Lean (because of that Lean and Agile are not the same) then taking but software people in 1995 (which is the thing that made well knonw to agile but in the last years). So, as an approach, agile is totally independent of the life cycle model you will use (you can apply agile with waterfall without problems. Here other missunderstanding: prople confuse sequential with waterfall) and the method you will use. With that said, the generation of value is totally independent of the approach, like cycle and method.
avatar
Markus Kopko AI Enabler for Project & Program Mgmt | Founder PMotion.ai / The PM AI Coach| PMotion.ai Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Dear Koti,

Absolutely, you've hit the nail on the head about Agile methodologies. It’s fascinating how Agile has revolutionized the way organizations manage projects and develop software. The emphasis on speed, customer satisfaction, and managing complexities more efficiently is really what sets Agile apart.

Think about the traditional way of doing things – the Waterfall model. Everything was linear, one step after another, which often meant waiting a long time before seeing any tangible results. Now, enter Agile, and it's like a breath of fresh air. It breaks down projects into smaller, manageable chunks, or iterations, allowing teams to deliver value incrementally. This not only speeds up the delivery process but also makes it easier to adapt to changes.

What I find most compelling about Agile is its customer-centric approach. By involving the customer throughout the process, getting their feedback, and iterating based on that feedback, the end product is more aligned with what the customer actually wants and needs. It's a game-changer, especially in today’s fast-paced world where customer needs can change rapidly.

Moreover, Agile’s emphasis on collaboration and communication within the team is a big plus. It encourages a more dynamic, flexible approach to problem-solving. When team members regularly collaborate and review their work, it leads to fewer complications and more innovative solutions.

However, it’s important to remember that Agile isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. It works best in environments where flexibility and speed are essential, and where customer needs are at the forefront. It also requires a shift in mindset – from detailed upfront planning to a more adaptive, iterative approach.

In my experience, implementing Agile can be a bit of a cultural shift for organizations used to the Waterfall model. It requires buy-in from all levels, especially from leadership, and a willingness to embrace change and uncertainty.

So, in essence, Agile methodologies offer a more responsive, customer-focused approach to project management and software development. It’s about delivering value faster, more efficiently, and in a way that’s more satisfying for the customer. What's your experience been like with Agile? Have you found it to be effective in your projects or organization?

BR,


Markus

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

I have made good judgements in the past. I have made good judgements in the future.

- Dan

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors