Project Management Central
|
Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
|
||||
|
||||
This traditional Agile methodology has always been a great innovation.
I'm not sure what is your question. Agile methodologies, including scrum, has its own characteristic - pros and cons. Some projects may go better with agile, and some - with a traditional approach. As usual - it depends - on the complexity, level of uncertainty, innovation, clarity of requirements, experience of the team, practices in an organization, influence of key stakeholders or even the experience of the project manager.
I like this kind of graphic to have some more illustration of agile vs. waterfall: https://www.agile-minds.com/wp-content/upl.../03/image-1.png So - I would disagree that agile and Scrum is ALWAYS good choice. It depends.
Koti -
Scrum and adaptive approaches can work well but only when they fit the context of the work being done and the culture they are introduced into. Scrum is not a project management framework and hence to make it fit a project lifecycle, it needs to be extended - it does not address transition/delivery concerns, nor does it consider factors such as getting funding, forming a team, defining the product vision and so on. Kiron
Koti, what is the question behind your post?
Seems good. however, what is your question?
|
||||
Please login or join to reply
ADVERTISEMENTS
|
"Managing senior programmers is like herding cats." - D. Platt |
