Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
This traditional Agile methodology has always been a great innovation.
I'm not sure what is your question. Agile methodologies, including scrum, has its own characteristic - pros and cons. Some projects may go better with agile, and some - with a traditional approach. As usual - it depends - on the complexity, level of uncertainty, innovation, clarity of requirements, experience of the team, practices in an organization, influence of key stakeholders or even the experience of the project manager.
I like this kind of graphic to have some more illustration of agile vs. waterfall: https://www.agile-minds.com/wp-content/upl.../03/image-1.png
So - I would disagree that agile and Scrum is ALWAYS good choice. It depends.
Scrum and adaptive approaches can work well but only when they fit the context of the work being done and the culture they are introduced into.
Scrum is not a project management framework and hence to make it fit a project lifecycle, it needs to be extended - it does not address transition/delivery concerns, nor does it consider factors such as getting funding, forming a team, defining the product vision and so on.
Koti, what is the question behind your post?
Seems good. however, what is your question?
Please login or join to reply