Project Management Central
Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
|
|||
|
|||
Robin -
This is true of any project where there is a high degree of uncertainty and/or complexity and an adaptive approach is one way to tackle these. Time or cost-boxing R&D initiatives and allowing scope to be flexible does work if there is time spent up front in defining the hypothesis (or hypotheses) which need to be tested. Kiron
Sergio Luis Conte
Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Never, in the history of project management, things like scope are stable. The key things, no matter the approach of life cycle you are using, is to be aware of possible changes and create the actions to be ready. In the case of R&D project this is more "easy" to manage because you are funding hypothesis to be proved (as @Kiron mentioned above). The important is to send the right message to everybody.
Robin, not a new question, but a good one.
Here is the beginning of a research paper abstract from 1996:
A successful R&D manager is, in many ways, an agent of change. R&D managers must respond effectively to changes in domestic and global competition, product and process technologies, customer requirements, regulatory matters, and senior management's perception of the role R&D plays in a firm. The responses to these changes flow downstream from R&D to other parts of the organization, in the form of new materials, methods, processes, and products. To help us understand the changes facing R&D management, Ashok K. Gupta and David Wilemon present the results of a study that examines the ideas and experiences of 120 R&D directors from technology-based companies. ..... |
Please login or join to reply
"Impartial observers from other planets would consider ours an utterly bizarre enclave if it were populated by birds, defined as flying animals, that nevertheless rarely or never actually flew. They would also be perplexed if they encountered in our seas, lakes, rivers and ponds, creatures defined as swimmers that never did any swimming. But they would be even more surprised to encounter a species defined as a thinking animal if, in fact, the creature very rarely indulged in actual thinking." - Steve Allen |