Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Strategies to prevent the "telephone game syndrome"

linkedin twitter facebook   Communications Management   Leadership   Using PMI Standards  
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
How do you prevent the "telephone game syndrome" from distorting information when it is passed from one person to another? This is a common problem in organizations, where information can be lost or misconstrued as it is relayed from a PM to a team leader, then to team members, and finally to the PMO and management. What strategies can be used to ensure that information reaches its destination with high fidelity?
Sort By:
avatar
William Dawe II Assistant Project Manager| Central Maine Power Canaan, ME, United States
In fairness- document document document, I always follow up with and email reviewing the details and reviewing / recapping the important points in the conversation. This supports understanding and also shows your awareness to the challenges/tasks at hand. Also builds a stronger accountability to the everyday hussle and bussle of the fast moving world. good luck!
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
May 23, 2024 1:22 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
Thanks William! feedback and monitoring! the old school is always a good option!
avatar
George Freeman Thought Leader | Author | Architect| Florida, United States
Francisco,

Agile purest have long held that the “telephone game” demonstrates the original sin of linear models; unfortunately, every time they attempt to illustrate the effect, their message gets lost in the translation—sorry, I couldn’t resist the opportunity. :-)

On the serious side, even the most precise and contextually correct words stated verbally or in document form are fodder for mistranslation.

Hence, I use a two-step approach to gain “high fidelity” knowledge:

[1] Supplement or replace the raw knowledge with an interpretive “basis perspective” that removes content noise (i.e., superfluous information) and elevates the read to a conceptual level, providing the consumer with clarity of point.

[2] Visualize the key elements and place them into their lifecycle constructs if applicable.

Conceptualized and visualized knowledge withstands the rigors of change we experience in projects. Stated differently, the fidelity of the knowledge maintains its shape regardless of where it is contextually applied in the realization process.

Meanwhile, non-visualized and non-conceptualized knowledge creates high levels of rework for project teams, as resources find it challenging to apply the knowledge to their work product due to contextual nuances that create misinterpretations of intent.

George
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
May 23, 2024 1:23 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
Thanks George! I liked the concept “high fidelity” knowledges, Regards!
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
May 15, 2024 3:13 PM
Replying to William Dawe II
...
In fairness- document document document, I always follow up with and email reviewing the details and reviewing / recapping the important points in the conversation. This supports understanding and also shows your awareness to the challenges/tasks at hand. Also builds a stronger accountability to the everyday hussle and bussle of the fast moving world. good luck!
Thanks William! feedback and monitoring! the old school is always a good option!
avatar
Francisco Herrera
Community Champion
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
May 16, 2024 5:04 PM
Replying to George Freeman
...
Francisco,

Agile purest have long held that the “telephone game” demonstrates the original sin of linear models; unfortunately, every time they attempt to illustrate the effect, their message gets lost in the translation—sorry, I couldn’t resist the opportunity. :-)

On the serious side, even the most precise and contextually correct words stated verbally or in document form are fodder for mistranslation.

Hence, I use a two-step approach to gain “high fidelity” knowledge:

[1] Supplement or replace the raw knowledge with an interpretive “basis perspective” that removes content noise (i.e., superfluous information) and elevates the read to a conceptual level, providing the consumer with clarity of point.

[2] Visualize the key elements and place them into their lifecycle constructs if applicable.

Conceptualized and visualized knowledge withstands the rigors of change we experience in projects. Stated differently, the fidelity of the knowledge maintains its shape regardless of where it is contextually applied in the realization process.

Meanwhile, non-visualized and non-conceptualized knowledge creates high levels of rework for project teams, as resources find it challenging to apply the knowledge to their work product due to contextual nuances that create misinterpretations of intent.

George
Thanks George! I liked the concept “high fidelity” knowledges, Regards!
avatar
Michael Browning Director, Cybersecurity| Vanderbilt University Nashville, United States
Thank you, this was a very interesting read!

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

If man could be crossed with the cat, it would improve man but deteriorate the cat.

- Mark Twain

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors