Imagine you're managing a project with diverse stakeholders, each pushing for additional features beyond the agreed scope. How would you handle scope creep while maintaining stakeholder satisfaction and keeping the project on track? Saving Changes...
Mark WarnerProject Manager| AURATucson, Az, United States
Scope creep prevention with multiple stakeholders should be addressed the same was you do for projects with just one stakeholder: a strictly enforced change management process.
...
1 reply by Pavan Maddi
Mar 03, 2025 7:46 PM
Pavan Maddi
...
Mark Warner Absolutely! Whether dealing with one or multiple stakeholders, preventing scope creep requires a well-defined and strictly enforced change management process. Clear documentation, approvals, and communication ensure alignment and keep the project under control.
To handle scope creep, you should take the contract/initial plan as a base. Everything that doesn't exist in the contract/initial plan should be taken as additional work that includes extra cost and extra time or extra resources. The additional things required should be evaluated and approved through a change control process.
...
1 reply by Pavan Maddi
Mar 03, 2025 7:45 PM
Pavan Maddi
...
Verónica Elizabeth Pozo Ruiz Great point! Managing scope creep starts with sticking to the initial plan. Any additional work should go through a proper change control process, ensuring extra cost, time, or resources are accounted for. Clear approvals help keep projects on track.
To handle scope creep, you should take the contract/initial plan as a base. Everything that doesn't exist in the contract/initial plan should be taken as additional work that includes extra cost and extra time or extra resources. The additional things required should be evaluated and approved through a change control process.
Verónica Elizabeth Pozo Ruiz Great point! Managing scope creep starts with sticking to the initial plan. Any additional work should go through a proper change control process, ensuring extra cost, time, or resources are accounted for. Clear approvals help keep projects on track. Saving Changes...
Scope creep prevention with multiple stakeholders should be addressed the same was you do for projects with just one stakeholder: a strictly enforced change management process.
Mark Warner Absolutely! Whether dealing with one or multiple stakeholders, preventing scope creep requires a well-defined and strictly enforced change management process. Clear documentation, approvals, and communication ensure alignment and keep the project under control. Saving Changes...
Having good relationships with stakeholders is a benefit but to protect all parties including yourself you should have a strong and effective change management process that is agreed by all key stakeholders when project kick-off. All changes to requirement baseline should be assessed openly, tranparently and fairly. Remember that we can never satisfy all stakeholders but they have to accept willingly to exchange something for their additional features
Khai Ng. Thanks for your insights! I completely agree—building good relationships with stakeholders is important, but a strong change management process is key. Clear agreements from the start and open discussions on changes help keep things fair and manageable for everyone. Saving Changes...
From a practical perspective it's better if you identify since the beginning of your project/product what does VALUE mean. And from there define a vision that is aligned to the organizational strategy and your customers' key objectives. From there you can groom or categorize the requests that you are getting from different stakeholders.
Additionally, I would strongly recommend to include the technical team in the prioritization, let them understand the requirements and make comments to know if it's feasible and to measure the efforts and resources needed to get all of the requests implemented.
Carlo Magno Rivera Picado Thanks for sharing! Defining value early on and aligning it with strategy helps in managing stakeholder requests effectively. Involving the technical team in prioritization ensures feasibility and proper resource planning, leading to better decision-making and smoother execution. Saving Changes...
First of all, it is necessary to have a clear project governance in place, where each participant understands the boundaries of their role. There should be a centralized communication channel and authority to address and validatie any backlog-related items (in-scope) and change requests/out-of-scope items.
Secondly, during project initiation clear scope, time and budgetary boundaries should be established. During planning and execution, scope items are getting refined, validated and prioritised (Must, Could, Should, Wouldn't) with the responsible stakeholder (e.g., product owner) based on the balance of time and budget.
Eleonora Mohilovska Good governance and clear role definitions are key. A central communication channel helps manage scope and change requests efficiently. Setting clear boundaries early and refining priorities with stakeholders ensures better control over time and budget throughout the project. Saving Changes...
Simple: taking a project change management process defined and putting it clear for all people involved from the very begining.
Sergio Luis Conte Thanks for your input! I completely agree—having a clear change management process from the start helps everyone stay aligned and avoids confusion. Setting expectations early makes it easier to handle changes smoothly during the project. Saving Changes...
from my point of view, a change log in combination with an approved project charter is key to maintaining a scope and avoid scope creep.
Svenja Merle Thanks for sharing! I agree—a well-maintained change log and a strong project charter help keep the scope in check. Clear documentation ensures everyone is on the same page and prevents unnecessary changes from creeping in. Saving Changes...
e.g., Specify that, based on the total value of the contract, the clients request for addl. services will be accepted as a verbal order and confirmed in writing when value less than 15% of total price of contract.
Any request over that amount requires a sit-down contract negotiation.
Cheers,
Bill
William M Hayden Jr Thanks for sharing, Bill! Having a clear contract structure with defined limits for verbal and written approvals is a great way to manage scope creep. It helps set expectations upfront and ensures larger changes get the proper discussion and agreement. Saving Changes...