Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Is it correct to classify projects as agile, predictive or hybrid?

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile   PMO   Using PMI Standards  
avatar
Jorge Paz PMO| Sistran Guatemala, Guatemala, Guatemala
Is it correct to classify projects as agile, predictive or hybrid?

Some argue that project management should be agnostic to the different approaches out there. Rather than strictly adhering to one methodology, the project environment should be assessed and a combination of methodologies, methods, frameworks, tools, and techniques should be used to maximize value delivery to stakeholders and the organization.

What do you think about project management agnostic?
Sort By:
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Jorge, in today's complex and rapidly evolving world, project management agnostic is a practical approach. We should be adaptable and flexible, rather than strictly adhering to a single methodology or approach.
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Jorge -

Project management has always been about picking the right lifecycle, approach, tools and techniques to fit the project's context. Any one size fits all approach will by definition not work as each project is a unique endeavor.

And projects themselves are not agile, predictive or hybrid - it is the approach or lifecycle choices we make which could fall into one of these categories.

Kiron
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
It is totally wrong. Unfortunatelly this type of things jeopardizes the work of lot of people. It is not because I am saying that. It is just to go to the genesis. Most of the people do not understand "the taxonomy" to define the way of working. You have approach, on the approach you have life cycle, on the life cycle you have method, on the method you have tools. Agile is an approach. No more than that. All people do to create solutions (where solution is equal to the thing to create plus the way to create it) is predictive. And about hybrid, because I wrote before about taxonomy, it does not exists.
avatar
Robert London Project & Risk Consultant, and Career Coach (PMP, RMP, CSM, CSP,CCC, MSIE| CoffeeCat Solutions, LLC DC/VA/MD Area, United States
It is helpful to classify a project and its framework, along with the type of project (e.g. BI, ERP, data warehousing, AI, infrastructure) since it helps the pm to define phases, tasks, deliverables, good practices, and risk management. Agnostic project management leaves too much in the air that is ill defined and left to PMs and project teams, which if unskilled or untrained, lead to project failures. The concept of agnostic project management can add to more uncertainty and implementation ambiguity.
avatar
PANNEERSELVAM KANNIAPPAN Sr Project Manager| Amazon Web Services San Francisco, CA, United States
Yes, projects can be classified as predictive, agile, or hybrid, but in practice project management is best viewed as methodology agnostic, tailoring the approach to fit the project context rather than forcing a single method.
avatar
Anton Oosthuizen Senior Business Analyst / Project Manager| Self Employed Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
I'd say not, but not because it is wrong, but because it puts you in a box. For me, it is about delivering value, so whatever you want to call it is irrelevant, really. If you work on an Agile scrum project, does this now mean that you MUST do whatever the framework/methodology requires you to do? NO! You must do what works and adds value.
avatar
David Portas London, United Kingdom
Categorising work in that way is extremely unhelpful in my opinion (and yes, some of the material published by PMI is not entirely blameless in this respect)

Agility is not a methodology and is more a characteristic of organizations and teams than of projects.
avatar
Aaron Porter
Community Champion
IT Director| Blade HQ Payson, UT, United States

Classifying projects can help improve the likelihood of project success, assuming you're doing more than just classifying projects. Look at your projects - are chances of success lesser or greater based on choosing a specific framework or methodology? How do you know which will be the most effective approach? In some scenarios, it can be pretty obvious. For example, Scrum is not the first thing that comes to mind for major construction projects. But it's not always that simple. Understanding the following can be helpful if you're in a position that you need to consider the best approach for the work to be done:

-...the nature of the work to be done

-...the company risk profile

-...time and urgency constraints, and other non-negotiables

-...team capabilities and ways of working

-...organizational context

-...the stakeholder landscape

-...the delivery & release environment

-...the value realization model

-...organizational cultural alignment

These are all variables that can shape the effectiveness of a chosen framework or methodology, to varying degrees, most of which cannot be easily changed by a project manager. If you can understand these variables and whether/how they impact your projects, and are in a position to choose the particular flavor of agile, predictive, or hybrid your team will use for the project, you can increase the likelihood of success. I'll elaborate on these, and why they matter, in a separate post.

One thing you can control, as a project manager, is your understanding of the various ways of working so that, when you need to run a project in a way that is new to your employer, you can. You don't need to go get certified in every framework and methodology, but understanding when and how to apply them will help you be a more effective project manager.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"The amount of money one needs is terrifying..."

- Ludwig Van Beethoven

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors