When Does “Good Enough” Become the Right Delivery Decision?

Quality Risk Management

Ashwin Kumar H M

Community Champion

Consultant| Canarys Automation Ltd Bangalore, Karnataka, India

As project managers, we are trained to optimize—scope, quality, timelines, and outcomes. But in real-world projects, especially under constraints, pursuing perfection can sometimes delay value or increase risk.

In my experience, knowing when “good enough” is actually the right decision is a critical but under-discussed skill.

Discussion points:

How do you decide when to stop refining and start delivering?

What signals help you distinguish between acceptable quality and risky compromise?

How do you align stakeholders when expectations differ on “good enough”?

Looking forward to hearing how others navigate this judgment call in practice.

Posted: Jan 24, 2026 10:28 PM

Sort By:

< 1 2 >

Stephen Emenike Senior Project Controls Specialist| BP Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

The line between “acceptable quality” and “risky compromise” is thin, and the signals are rarely loud. But from experience, there are patterns experienced PMs learn to spot.
Acceptable quality can be when deviations are intentional, documented, low‑risk, and still meet core requirements. The team understands the impact, testing stays within tolerance, and SMEs can explain decisions confidently.
Risky compromise is when changes are driven by pressure, undocumented, poorly understood, or affecting foundational requirements. You will often witness see rising defects, unclear impacts, nervous engineers, or shortcuts that undermine safety, compliance, or core functionality.

Posted: Feb 8, 2026 7:09 PM

< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

When Does “Good Enough” Become the Right Delivery Decision?

Sponsors

Newsletters