Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Catching Overlaps Before They Become Delivery Issues

linkedin twitter facebook   Leadership   Lessons Learned   PMO  
avatar
Bruce Buryo
Community Champion

I’ve noticed that overlaps in work often only become visible once teams are already deep into execution. In some cases, multiple contributors are progressing in parallel on related capabilities, each making reasonable decisions, but without an early agreement on direction or ownership. When this surfaces later, it becomes a coordination issue rather than a design discussion.

As a PM, how do you recognize early signals that something needs clearer alignment and ownership upfront, rather than being addressed once delivery is already in motion?
Sort By:
avatar
Imran Afzal Cary, NC, United States
Bruce — this resonates a lot. In my experience, overlaps don’t usually show up as conflict at first; they show up as reasonable progress in parallel.

A few early signals I’ve learned to watch for:

• Multiple teams describing the same capability using different language
• “Temporary” assumptions about ownership that never get formally closed
• Decisions being framed as implementation details when they’re actually directional
• Roadmaps that align on milestones but not on what success looks like at the capability level

When those patterns are present, overlap isn’t a coordination problem waiting to happen — it’s a decision that hasn’t been made yet, quietly deferred into execution.

What’s helped most isn’t more upfront documentation, but forcing a very specific kind of early conversation:

“If both paths succeed, which one do we intend to keep?”

That question tends to surface ownership, intent, and tradeoffs very quickly.

Once delivery is underway, the cost of asking it rises — not because it’s harder to answer, but because work has already begun to legitimize multiple interpretations.

For me, the PM’s role in these moments isn’t to resolve design, but to make ambiguity visible early enough that someone with authority is forced to choose — before overlap hardens into rework or coordination debt.

Curious whether you’ve seen particular forums or checkpoints where this conversation reliably happens early — or where it tends to slip through unnoticed.
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
This has to be made after you create the project schedule and worked on schedule optimization. But I could agree it depends on the method you use to create solutions. Some methods does not have schedules defined as a deliverable, no matter you can create it. For example a feature oriented schedule than a deliverable oriented schedule. In this cases the overlap is detected during planning no matter you have or dont have a schedule created.
avatar
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
Community Champion
Program Manager| HARPER SRL Santo Domingo / Distrito Nacional, Dominican Republic
I catch it when progress sounds good but ownership is fuzzy.
Different language for the same capability or “temporary” assumptions are my cue to pause and force a clear choice early.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read."

- Groucho Marx

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors







Vendor Events

See all Vendor Events

Newsletters

Jun 3: The Career Problem Facing New PMs
May 20: Your PM Career as a Project Life Cycle
May 13: The Big Lie After Layoffs

See all newsletters