...
I think the challenge isn’t that these outcomes are intangible.
It’s that we try to measure them
directly instead of measuring what they
change.
Culture and collaboration don’t show up as ROI on their own.
They show up in how the system behaves differently.
Faster decisions.
Fewer escalations.
Less rework.
Clearer prioritization.
More predictable delivery.
So instead of asking, “How do we measure culture or collaboration?” I’ve found it more useful to ask:
“What improved
because they improved?”
For example:
If collaboration improved, did cross-team dependencies resolve faster?
If culture improved, did decision latency decrease?
If governance improved, did we reduce variance between planned and actual outcomes?
Those are measurable.
The second piece is narrative.
Because PMOs don’t just generate outcomes—they reduce risk and enable better decisions.
And a prevented failure rarely shows up in a dashboard.
So you have to make it visible.
“This initiative would have slipped by 6 weeks without X dependency intervention.”
“This decision was made in 2 days instead of 2 weeks because the governance path was clear.”
ROI in this space isn’t about forcing intangible things into financial metrics.
It’s about translating them into
observable system improvements and then connecting those improvements to business impact over time.
If you do that well, the value stops being intangible.
It just becomes
visible.