Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Where can an organization begin to implement Agile? And how can a methodology be judged to be Scrum?

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile   Scrum  
avatar
Adnan Alghanmi Saudi Arabia

Sort By:
avatar
Imran Afzal Cary, NC, United States
This is a big question, but it really comes down to two things:

where to start

and

how to know if you’re actually doing Scrum vs. just calling it Scrum.

1. Where to begin implementing Agile

Don’t start with a company-wide rollout. That’s where most efforts fail.

Start with:

  • A single team working on a real product/problem
  • A supportive leader willing to protect the experiment
  • A clear outcome (not just “be Agile,” but improve delivery predictability, cycle time, etc.)
Focus on introducing:

  • A visible backlog (prioritized work)
  • Short planning horizons (e.g., 2-week cycles)
  • Regular feedback loops (reviews + retrospectives)
Agile adoption works best when it’s treated as an operating model experiment, not a transformation program.

2. How to judge if something is actually Scrum

A lot of teams say “we do Scrum” because they have standups and sprints. That’s not enough.

At a minimum, Scrum means you have:

Defined roles
  • Product Owner (owns prioritization)
  • Scrum Master (owns the system/process)
  • Team (owns delivery)
Clear events
  • Sprint Planning
  • Daily Scrum
  • Sprint Review
  • Retrospective
Working increments at the end of each sprint

  • Not partial work
  • Not status updates
  • Actual usable output
But more importantly:

If you’re not seeing:

  • Faster feedback
  • Better prioritization decisions
  • Increasing delivery predictability
Then it may be Scrum in structure—but not in outcome.

In practice, most organizations don’t struggle with doing Scrum.

They struggle with:

  • unclear prioritization
  • too much work in progress
  • and decisions happening outside the team
Scrum exposes those issues—it doesn’t solve them by itself.

Curious—are you asking from a transformation perspective, or trying to assess whether your current team is “really Scrum”?
avatar
Batuhan Bahar Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
I think Imran Afzal’s previous answer already covered the original question really well, but one angle I would add is patience.

In my experience, one of the first things Scrum does is expose problems that were already there, but had somehow been accepted, tolerated, or pushed under the rug until an agile transition begins. Too many dependencies, unclear priorities, overloaded teams, outside interruptions.

That can make it look like Scrum is not working, when in reality it is simply making those issues more visible.

So for me, one sign that it is becoming real Scrum is not just the ceremonies or roles, but whether the team is becoming more honest, more predictable over time, and more consistent in delivering valuable increments.
avatar
Aaron Porter
Community Champion
IT Director| Blade HQ Payson, UT, United States
According to the Scrum Guide, the Scrum framework, as outlined in the guide, is immutable. This means that if you're following the Scrum Guide you're using scrum, and if you modify your approach beyond the Scrum Guide you're no longer using Scrum.

But, does it really matter?

If you want your development team to be agile, you can implement Scrum or one of several other agile or hybrid methodologies/frameworks/approaches/whatever. If you want your business to be agile you're going to need more than agile development. You should not expect to implement Scrum and have organizational agility emerge automatically or organically.

Scaled agile models can help, but organizational agility comes from three systemic capabilities - decision agility, funding agility, and structural agility - not from a framework. An organization becomes agile when decision-making, funding, and structure are aligned around fast, informed tradeoffs, not just because it implements an agile framework.
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina

First of all: people need to understand what agile is. Agile was born in 1990 trying to find an alternative to Lean. Agile was born in manufacturing and time after software people took it. I can talk about that because I was part of both movements but no matter that you can check the foundations because documents are there. Then Agile is an approach so it does mean it is independent of the method and the life cycle to use. You can apply agile with waterfall life cycle. Putting this in terms of the PMI you can check in business analysis information belonging to PMI because you will see an activity where the business analyst is accountable to help to define the approach to use to create the solution. Rememenber: we are hired to particpate in the creation of a solution where solution is "the thing" to be created (product/service/result) plus "the way" to create it (the project/program). Scrum is just one of the ways to create the solution. Other thing to remember: Scrum is a framework that must be completed with techniques and tools. Example: you will not find a line in the Scrum description saying that requirements must be writting in User Story format. So, with all my due respect, I do not agree with some of the previous answers (and sorry if I missunderstood some of them).

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Bad artists always admire each other's work."

- Oscar Wilde

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors