Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Stakeholder choice

linkedin twitter facebook   Stakeholder Management  
avatar
FLAVIEN GAGOUM NTEUMAGNE Managing Director| SACAM IT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION Johannesburg, Gt, South Africa

Sometimes you indentify a stakeholder to the project but the person refuse to be a stakeholder claiming he/she does not have anything to do with the project.

Sort By:
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
A stakeholder is not defined by whether someone accepts the label or wants to participate in the project.

A stakeholder is identified by impact, influence, dependency, authority, exposure to risk or the potential to affect, or be affected by, the project outcomes.

What is often confused is:
– Stakeholder identification
and
– Stakeholder engagement assessment.

In PMI terms, the Stakeholder Engagement Assessment Matrix (SEAM) evaluates the current and desired level of engagement:

– Unaware
– Resistant
– Neutral
– Supportive
– Leading

A person may refuse involvement and still remain a stakeholder.

In practice, that refusal may simply indicate:

– Resistance,
– Disengagement,
– Political caution,
– Accountability avoidance,
– Or lack of perceived relevance.

But stakeholder status is not voluntary membership.
It is a structural relationship to the project.

This distinction matters because projects are frequently impacted not only by supportive stakeholders, but also by stakeholders who disengage, resist, minimize relevance or remain outside formal discussions while still influencing outcomes.

When relevant stakeholders disconnect from the initiative:

– Risks become less visible
– Dependencies remain hidden
– Alignment deteriorates
– Resistance surfaces later
– And decisions lose important context

The stakeholder matrix does not determine whether someone is a stakeholder.

It helps assess:

– Influence
– Interest
– Impact
– Engagement level
– And communication approach

So the real question is usually not:
“Do they want to be stakeholders?”

But rather:
“Can the project affect them, or can they affect the project?”

If the answer is yes, they remain stakeholders regardless of their level of engagement.
...
1 reply by FLAVIEN GAGOUM NTEUMAGNE
May 14, 2026 7:25 AM
FLAVIEN GAGOUM NTEUMAGNE
...
Thank you very much Luis for your input.
avatar
FLAVIEN GAGOUM NTEUMAGNE Managing Director| SACAM IT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION Johannesburg, Gt, South Africa
May 14, 2026 6:49 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
A stakeholder is not defined by whether someone accepts the label or wants to participate in the project.

A stakeholder is identified by impact, influence, dependency, authority, exposure to risk or the potential to affect, or be affected by, the project outcomes.

What is often confused is:
– Stakeholder identification
and
– Stakeholder engagement assessment.

In PMI terms, the Stakeholder Engagement Assessment Matrix (SEAM) evaluates the current and desired level of engagement:

– Unaware
– Resistant
– Neutral
– Supportive
– Leading

A person may refuse involvement and still remain a stakeholder.

In practice, that refusal may simply indicate:

– Resistance,
– Disengagement,
– Political caution,
– Accountability avoidance,
– Or lack of perceived relevance.

But stakeholder status is not voluntary membership.
It is a structural relationship to the project.

This distinction matters because projects are frequently impacted not only by supportive stakeholders, but also by stakeholders who disengage, resist, minimize relevance or remain outside formal discussions while still influencing outcomes.

When relevant stakeholders disconnect from the initiative:

– Risks become less visible
– Dependencies remain hidden
– Alignment deteriorates
– Resistance surfaces later
– And decisions lose important context

The stakeholder matrix does not determine whether someone is a stakeholder.

It helps assess:

– Influence
– Interest
– Impact
– Engagement level
– And communication approach

So the real question is usually not:
“Do they want to be stakeholders?”

But rather:
“Can the project affect them, or can they affect the project?”

If the answer is yes, they remain stakeholders regardless of their level of engagement.
Thank you very much Luis for your input.
avatar
Abolfazl Yousefi Darestani Manager, Quality and Continuous Improvement| Hörmann-TNR Industrial Doors Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
I agree with Luis.
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
My recommendation is taking a look to methods like Solution Selling (sometimes called SPIN Selling) to deal with this situations. You can find it for free in the internet.
avatar
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
Community Champion
Program Manager| HARPER SRL Santo Domingo / Distrito Nacional, Dominican Republic
I agree with Luis on this. I’ve also seen cases where people reject the label because they associate it with extra accountability, additional work, or political exposure around the project.
Even then, if the project can affect them or they can influence the outcome, they are still stakeholders whether they actively want to participate or not.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Life begins at 40, but often so does arthritis and the habit of telling the same story three times to the same person."

- Sam Levenson

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors