With organizations increasingly focusing on cost reduction and improved efficiency through AI adoption across projects, Project Managers are also evolving the way they drive, manage, and deliver projects.
Depending on the nature of the project, AI can significantly improve efficiency, especially when PMs adopt and integrate AI tools effectively into their day-to-day activities.
In my role, where I work on SaaS implementations for customers, I leverage Enterprise ChatGPT extensively by creating dedicated Projects and GPTs for reusable PM activities. Some of the areas where AI has helped include:
JIRA analysis for aging items, dashboards, and insights
Automated email responses in Outlook
Automated Slack responses
Using SharePoint documents as a RAG knowledge base
PPT creation, including kick-off decks and solution presentations
Status summaries and executive updates
Risk management
Other recurring PM activities
For many of these activities, I have observed up to a 40% reduction in effort.
Of course, the actual efficiency gain may vary based on the type of project, organization, AI tools used, and how deeply AI is embedded into PM workflows.
We would love to hear your thoughts and experiences:
How much time are PMs saving by using AI?
Please share your inputs in the following format so the insights can be useful across different types of projects:
Nature of Project:
Example: Product Development, Embedded, ERP Implementation, Gaming, SaaS Implementation, etc.
Please share specific PM activities where AI has helped, such as reporting, risk management, stakeholder communication, documentation, planning, or governance.
Looking forward to learning from the community’s experiences.
Luis BrancoCEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, LdªCarcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Nature of Project: Complex transformation programs, SaaS/ERP implementations, PMO environments and AI-enabled operating models.
Percentage of Effort Saved as a PM Using AI:
In my experience, AI can reduce effort by 20% to 50% in highly repetitive and information-intensive activities such as: • Reporting, • Meeting summaries, • Stakeholder communications, • Dashboard preparation, • Risk consolidation, • PMO coordination, • Knowledge retrieval, • Recurring governance activities.
But I think the bigger shift is not only time savings.
AI is evolving from an occasional productivity tool into a persistent operational layer embedded into project workflows, collaboration platforms and organizational knowledge systems.
That is why I see AI increasingly operating as part of the team’s cognitive support system, while humans must remain firmly inside the decision, accountability and strategic alignment loop.
Otherwise, organizations may accelerate execution faster than they improve governance, integration and decision coherence.
...
1 reply by Arun Vedula
May 26, 2026 4:28 AM
Arun Vedula
...
Totally Agree Luis, that's why Human-in-loop is important !!
Nature of Project: Complex transformation programs, SaaS/ERP implementations, PMO environments and AI-enabled operating models.
Percentage of Effort Saved as a PM Using AI:
In my experience, AI can reduce effort by 20% to 50% in highly repetitive and information-intensive activities such as: • Reporting, • Meeting summaries, • Stakeholder communications, • Dashboard preparation, • Risk consolidation, • PMO coordination, • Knowledge retrieval, • Recurring governance activities.
But I think the bigger shift is not only time savings.
AI is evolving from an occasional productivity tool into a persistent operational layer embedded into project workflows, collaboration platforms and organizational knowledge systems.
That is why I see AI increasingly operating as part of the team’s cognitive support system, while humans must remain firmly inside the decision, accountability and strategic alignment loop.
Otherwise, organizations may accelerate execution faster than they improve governance, integration and decision coherence.
Totally Agree Luis, that's why Human-in-loop is important !! Saving Changes...
Program Manager| HARPER SRLSanto Domingo / Distrito Nacional, Dominican Republic
Nature of Project: Software Development, Cybersecurity, Infrastructure, and Strategic Initiatives Percentage of Effort Saved: Around 20–30%, depending on the activity. Tools: ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Examples: Meeting summaries, status reports, documentation drafts, risk reviews, presentation content, stakeholder communications, and organizing information from multiple sources. The biggest benefit for me has not been the time savings itself, but being able to spend more time on decisions, stakeholder management, and strategic discussions.
...
1 reply by Arun Vedula
Jun 25, 2026 3:41 AM
Arun Vedula
...
Thank you Lissette - 20-30% is still a great deal. Agree with your point on the time savings during key decisions and strategic discussions.
Nature of Project: Software Development, Cybersecurity, Infrastructure, and Strategic Initiatives Percentage of Effort Saved: Around 20–30%, depending on the activity. Tools: ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Examples: Meeting summaries, status reports, documentation drafts, risk reviews, presentation content, stakeholder communications, and organizing information from multiple sources. The biggest benefit for me has not been the time savings itself, but being able to spend more time on decisions, stakeholder management, and strategic discussions.
Thank you Lissette - 20-30% is still a great deal. Agree with your point on the time savings during key decisions and strategic discussions. Saving Changes...
Project Managers save 20% to 40% of their time by using AI to handle repetitive administrative work. Example: Instead of spending hours digging through emails and spreadsheets, a PM uses Jira AI or Microsoft Copilot to instantly summarize project risks and write weekly status reports in minutes.
...
1 reply by Arun Vedula
Jun 26, 2026 8:41 AM
Arun Vedula
...
Absolutely true Syed, I have seen AI doing wonders by skimming through the outlook emails and alerting, summarising and even creating draft responses.
I'm not sure AI has saved me much time on projects. GenAI usage has had some impact on how I spend my time - validating content more than creating content - but my personal use of AI hasn't resulted in projects getting done faster.
To be fair, part of this is due to the culture of the company where I work and the nature of my role - my time is not dedicated to project management. The company doesn't want a project administrator.
I've worked at companies where meeting notes were more important and you were expected to send them out fairly soon after the meeting. I can see GenAI having greater impact at companies like that, but there might be additional steps that could be taken that don't involve AI that could be more beneficial. At one company, I pushed back because it became obvious fairly quickly that most people weren't reading them and there were more important things for me to do. I didn't stop publishing them, but I also didn't put them before activities that were more critical for project success. GenAI usage would still have had value, in this case, but it would have been secondary.
The use of GenAI by project team members has had greater impact on the project schedule than my use of it, but it's not always about less work - sometimes it's due to greater confidence in the information (even if that may be just an illusion). I'll be looking into Optimization AI tools to see if it helps even more. Claude code and Github Copilot are helping with development and code review, but I'm not sure about speed improvements, yet. AI-driven Anomaly Detection is something I need to look into to help with testing. Predictive AI tools, tied to our data, help leadership make faster decisions.
...
1 reply by Arun Vedula
Jun 26, 2026 8:35 AM
Arun Vedula
...
Aaron, thank you for your inputs. AI can significantly enhance many Project Management activities, provided the Project Manager knows how to use it effectively. It's also important to ensure that any AI usage complies with the organization's AI policies and data security guidelines. Here are a few practical examples that Project Managers can try using any standard AI platform: 1. Project Charter and Project Plan Generation By providing contract documents, statements of work, or requirements, AI can generate an initial draft of the Project Charter and Project Plan in seconds. Traditionally, preparing the first draft for a moderately sized software project can take 2–4 days. With AI, after a few prompt refinements and reviews, a high-quality version can often be ready in less than an hour. 2. Kick-off Presentation Creation Creating a comprehensive project kick-off deck typically takes a couple of days. AI can dramatically reduce this effort by generating a professional presentation based on project documents, contracts, and requirements. The Project Manager can then review, tailor, and refine the content to meet the project's specific needs. 3. Analysis of Project Data from JIRA or Other Tracking Tools AI can quickly analyze data exported from JIRA or similar tracking systems to produce valuable insights, including:
Defect trend analysis
Aging analysis
Pending and overdue action tracking
Sprint and delivery metrics
Risk identification based on correlations across multiple trackers and project documents
These examples only scratch the surface of what's possible. The key isn't just having access to AI; it is knowing when, where, and how to use it effectively. Equally important is recognizing that AI is an assistant, not a replacement for sound project management judgment. Many critical PM responsibilities, such as stakeholder management, negotiation, decision-making, leadership, and handling complex project dynamics, still rely heavily on human experience and expertise.
You mentioned about organisations relying on the notes taken, AI can even read that and yet save lot of time of the PM in coming up with action items, next steps, meeting minutes and status reports. Agree ?
Saving Changes...
Sergio Luis ConteHelping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based OrganizationsBuenos Aires, Argentina
95% of project, program and portfolio management activities (and not only activities) can be sustitute by agentic ai systems. I am not saying that "by the book". Just my personal actual experience. Just to comment, is not about AI. It is about generative AI.
...
1 reply by Arun Vedula
Jun 26, 2026 8:39 AM
Arun Vedula
...
Thanks Sergio, 95% is a BIG deal !! Since it is based on your experience, I would be interested to know more on the nature of project and the key use cases, appreciate any insights !
I'm not sure AI has saved me much time on projects. GenAI usage has had some impact on how I spend my time - validating content more than creating content - but my personal use of AI hasn't resulted in projects getting done faster.
To be fair, part of this is due to the culture of the company where I work and the nature of my role - my time is not dedicated to project management. The company doesn't want a project administrator.
I've worked at companies where meeting notes were more important and you were expected to send them out fairly soon after the meeting. I can see GenAI having greater impact at companies like that, but there might be additional steps that could be taken that don't involve AI that could be more beneficial. At one company, I pushed back because it became obvious fairly quickly that most people weren't reading them and there were more important things for me to do. I didn't stop publishing them, but I also didn't put them before activities that were more critical for project success. GenAI usage would still have had value, in this case, but it would have been secondary.
The use of GenAI by project team members has had greater impact on the project schedule than my use of it, but it's not always about less work - sometimes it's due to greater confidence in the information (even if that may be just an illusion). I'll be looking into Optimization AI tools to see if it helps even more. Claude code and Github Copilot are helping with development and code review, but I'm not sure about speed improvements, yet. AI-driven Anomaly Detection is something I need to look into to help with testing. Predictive AI tools, tied to our data, help leadership make faster decisions.
Aaron, thank you for your inputs. AI can significantly enhance many Project Management activities, provided the Project Manager knows how to use it effectively. It's also important to ensure that any AI usage complies with the organization's AI policies and data security guidelines. Here are a few practical examples that Project Managers can try using any standard AI platform: 1. Project Charter and Project Plan Generation By providing contract documents, statements of work, or requirements, AI can generate an initial draft of the Project Charter and Project Plan in seconds. Traditionally, preparing the first draft for a moderately sized software project can take 2–4 days. With AI, after a few prompt refinements and reviews, a high-quality version can often be ready in less than an hour. 2. Kick-off Presentation Creation Creating a comprehensive project kick-off deck typically takes a couple of days. AI can dramatically reduce this effort by generating a professional presentation based on project documents, contracts, and requirements. The Project Manager can then review, tailor, and refine the content to meet the project's specific needs. 3. Analysis of Project Data from JIRA or Other Tracking Tools AI can quickly analyze data exported from JIRA or similar tracking systems to produce valuable insights, including:
Defect trend analysis
Aging analysis
Pending and overdue action tracking
Sprint and delivery metrics
Risk identification based on correlations across multiple trackers and project documents
These examples only scratch the surface of what's possible. The key isn't just having access to AI; it is knowing when, where, and how to use it effectively. Equally important is recognizing that AI is an assistant, not a replacement for sound project management judgment. Many critical PM responsibilities, such as stakeholder management, negotiation, decision-making, leadership, and handling complex project dynamics, still rely heavily on human experience and expertise.
You mentioned about organisations relying on the notes taken, AI can even read that and yet save lot of time of the PM in coming up with action items, next steps, meeting minutes and status reports. Agree ?
...
1 reply by Aaron Porter
Jun 26, 2026 10:46 AM
Aaron Porter
...
I partially agree. Give me a template and all the data I need and I can pump out a project charter or kick-off presentation in significantly less time than 2-4 days, too. I'm not saying I can synthesize all the information faster than AI, but the main bottleneck isn't typing.
I don't want to spend too much time talking about (or capturing) meeting notes. If I had to capture a transcript, I'd likely use AI. At a minimum I'd record it and have Word transcribe the recording - I could do this before I had AI tools. Fortunately, it's been over 20 years since I've had to capture a full transcript of a meeting. I capture key points, decisions, and action items during the meeting. That's it. Yes, AI can do this, too, but I've found I learn more about the project when I'm synthesizing the information, asking questions as needed, and writing it down as it's being discussed. It also keeps my mind from wandering (some meetings can just drag on). AI can't replace the knowledge and context I've gained through doing this.
I'm glad you brought up analyzing project data and specifically mentioned Jira. It's one of the handful of work/project tracking tools where the AI is more than a GenAI writing assistant. The real power here is not that it speeds up the production of project management artifacts, it's that it has the potential to help speed up effective decision-making.
I think we're mostly on the same page - that you have to have access to the right kind of AI capabilities and know when, where, and how to use them effectively. A project manager that works in a heavy artifact-driven project environment is likely to get more benefit from using GenAI than a project manager with less administrative burden, which is what too many conversations about AI usage focus on. To your point, this only scratches the surface of the various AI capabilities, which extend far beyond GenAI.
95% of project, program and portfolio management activities (and not only activities) can be sustitute by agentic ai systems. I am not saying that "by the book". Just my personal actual experience. Just to comment, is not about AI. It is about generative AI.
Thanks Sergio, 95% is a BIG deal !! Since it is based on your experience, I would be interested to know more on the nature of project and the key use cases, appreciate any insights ! Saving Changes...
Project Managers save 20% to 40% of their time by using AI to handle repetitive administrative work. Example: Instead of spending hours digging through emails and spreadsheets, a PM uses Jira AI or Microsoft Copilot to instantly summarize project risks and write weekly status reports in minutes.
Absolutely true Syed, I have seen AI doing wonders by skimming through the outlook emails and alerting, summarising and even creating draft responses. Saving Changes...