Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

What ethical strategies have you found effective in surfacing and addressing unresolved risks?

linkedin twitter facebook   Agile   Ethics   Risk Management  
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia

For an Agile team, visual tools such as burn-down graphs, risk charts, and dashboards are essential for tracking progress and aligning teams. However, these tools, when misused, can inadvertently become shields that obscure unresolved risks and enable teams to sidestep true accountability. This phenomenon, accountability avoidance, raises significant ethical concerns, especially when metrics are celebrated while real outcomes remain unaddressed. Using the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct and standards such as ISO 31000, this post explores the pitfalls of accountability avoidance and offers practical recommendations for Agile practitioners.

Shifting Focus from Unresolved Risks

Agile teams often rely on visual management charts to surface and manage risks. Yet, these charts can be weaponized to shift focus away from critical but unresolved risks. Teams may “close the loop” on a risk by updating its status on a chart, rather than by resolving the underlying issue. As a result, risks remain dormant, only to resurface later as project blockers or failures.

Claiming Success Through Vanity Metrics

Ron Jeffries, one of the authors of Extreme Programming, warns against the temptation to conflate the achievement of metrics with true project success. Metrics such as velocity, story points completed, or risk items “addressed” may create a comforting illusion of progress. However, these numbers often fail to capture the nuanced, outcome-based realities of project delivery. When teams focus on what’s easy to measure instead of what truly matters, the result is performance theatre—a misleading display that undermines genuine accountability.

The Ethical Dimension: Accountability and Responsibility

The PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct emphasizes responsibility, honesty, and respect for all stakeholders. When teams prioritize looking good over doing good, they violate this ethical foundation. ISO 31000, the international standard for risk management, similarly underscores the need for transparent, outcome-focused risk practices. Accountability avoidance not only jeopardizes project outcomes but erodes trust and professional integrity within the organization.

Blog post: Accountability Avoidance in Agile Projects: When Metrics Mask the Real Risks – an Ethics perspective

ProjectManagement.com - The Agile Enterprise

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"You must be the change you want to see in the world."

- Mahatma Gandhi

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors